nnpubliclyjnnaccessible
,SOLUTION MANUAL FOR jj jj
Business Its Legal, Ethical, and Global Environment, 12th
j j j j j j j j j j jj j j
jj Edition Chapter 1-20 jj j j
Chapter 1 j j
Table of Contents jj jj
Consider ....................................................................................................................................................... 1
Consider… 1.2 ........................................................................................................................................... 1
jj
Consider… 1.3 ........................................................................................................................................... 2
jj
Case Problems ............................................................................................................................................................... 2
j j
Case 1.1.................................................................................................................................................... 2
jj
For the Manager’s Desk .......................................................................................................................................... 4
j j j j jj
The Cover-up versus the Crime, page 11 ...................................................................................... 4
jj j j j j j j j j jj
Ethical Issues .................................................................................................................................................................... 4
jj
Case 1.1, page 10 ................................................................................................................................ 4
j j j j jj
Business Strategy ........................................................................................................................................................... 5
jj
COVID-19 Lockouts and Business Civil Disobedience ......................................................................... 5
jj jj j j jj jj
Chapter Review ............................................................................................................................................................. 6
j j
Answers to Chapter Questions and Problems .................................................................................. 6
j j jj j j j j jj
Economics, Ethics, & the Law: The Cost of Corporate Wrongdoing.................................... 12
j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j
Consider…
Consider… 1.2 jj
After he enrolled in the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Damon
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
Thompson experienced auditory hallucinations. He believed other students in the
j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
classroom and dormitory were criticizing him. School administrators eventually
j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j
learned of Thompson’s delusions and attempted to provide mental health
j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j
treatment. However, one morning Thompson stabbed fellow student Katherine Rosen
j j j j jj j j jj j j j j j j j j j j
during a chemistry lab. Rosen sued the university and several of its employees
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j
for negligence, arguing they failed to protect her from Thompson’s foreseeable
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j jj j j jj
violent conduct.
j j j j
UCLA is a state educational institution. Based on the decision in the Avila case,
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
what should the court decide? Consider whether UCLA has a duty to
j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
protect students from injury on the campus and, if so, what types of
j j j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
©nn2022jnnCengage.nnAllnnRights jjnnReserved.jjnnMaynnnotnnbejnnscanned,jnncopiedjnnorjnnduplicated,nnorjnnpostedjnntonna 2
j j nnpubliclyjnnaccessible
,j j injuries. Be sure to consider what is different in this factual pattern from the
j j jj j j j j j j j j j j jj j j jj jj jj j j
©nn2022jnnCengage.nnAllnnRights jjnnReserved.jjnnMaynnnotnnbejnnscanned,jnncopiedjnnorjnnduplicated,nnorjnnpostedjnntonna 3
j j nnpubliclyjnnaccessible
, facts in Avila. What will the impact be on students, faculty, and administrators
j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
pending on which way the court decides on the issues of liability and duty? Be
j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
sure to consider the purposes and characteristics of law in evaluating the claim
j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
Ms. Rosen for injuries. [Regents of the University of California v Superior Court,
j j j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
413 P.3d 656 (Cal,2018)]
j j j j jj j j
Solution
The trial court denied UCLA summary judgment. UCLA filed a petition for writ of
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
mandate, requesting an order directing trial court to enter summary judgment in its
j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
favor. The Court of Appeal granted the petition. The Supreme Court granted review,
j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
superseding the opinion of the Court of Appeal.
j j j j j j j j j j jj j j j j
The Supreme Court held that the university had duty of care to protect students
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
from foreseeable violence during the chemistry lab, reversing a long line of
j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
precedent.
j j
This case is different from the Avila case in that UCLA had knowledge of
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
j jthe potential harm that the student could do. In the Avila case, the conduct was
j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
such that it could not be anticipated except perhaps the possibility that players
j j j j j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j
j jhave disobeyed the rules of the game, but there was no direct knowledge
j j j j j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j
about the pitcher’s tendencies to bean batters. In this case, UCLA was aware of
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j
the problems the student had and was working with the student. The case was a
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j jj j j
warning to universities about the importance of curbing the behaviors of students
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
and then, when necessary removing them from the campus as a danger to
j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
themselves and other students. The court noted that the scope of the duty is
j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
j jbased on the extent of the j j j j j j j j j j
relationship the student had with the university. j j j j j j j j j j j j
The immunity of government entities was curbed in Avila and now the courts are
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
simply dealing with the concept of duty. What is the duty of government
j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
entities? How far does it extend? What actions must they take?
j j j j [Regents of j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j
the University of California v Superior Court, 413 P.3d 656 (Cal. 2018)]
j j j j j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j
Consider… 1.3 jj
Every state, county, and city has laws that regulate the maximum speed for
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
their roadways. Yet, surveys indicate that nearly 100% of us admit to driving
j j jj jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
above the speed limit. What philosophy of law do we follow when we
j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
decide which laws to obey, how closely we follow those laws, and when
j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
we will follow them? Is there a risk to society when we make our own
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
decisions about following the law?
j j j j j j j j j j
Solution
Speeding is an example of the norm shifting. That is, there is a law, but
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
j jfew people follow the law and the result is that the law becomes meaningless.
j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
Some philosophers fear that disregard of the law on an individual basis could mean
j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
that we are introducing anarchy—the law has no effect. Others would follow the
j j j j j j j j j j jj j j j j j j j j j j j j j j
normative standard of doing what is acceptable to others.
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j jj
©nn2022jnnCengage.nnAllnnRights jjnnReserved.jjnnMaynnnotnnbejnnscanned,jnncopiedjnnorjnnduplicated,nnorjnnpostedjnntonna 4
j j nnpubliclyjnnaccessible