,RCE2601 Assignment 4 (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
2025 - DUE 4 September 2025; 100% TRUSTED
Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
Question 1 – Literature Review Design (20)
(a) Conceptual vs Theoretical Framework (10)
Conceptual framework
A map of the key concepts/variables in your study and how
you think they relate.
Built from prior literature and your context; may mix
multiple theories.
Purpose: guides data collection/analysis by clarifying what
to look for.
Theoretical framework
A single (or bounded set of) established theory(/ies) you
adopt to interpret the study.
Purpose: anchors your study in a formal explanatory lens
(e.g., Social Cognitive Theory, Critical Pedagogy).
How to decide (use one of these sentences and complete the
blanks):
If your study aims to test/examine relationships among
specific variables (e.g., X → Y → Z), a conceptual
framework is more appropriate because your focus is
, mapping constructs like ___, ___, and ___ and proposing
links such as ___.
If your study seeks to interpret phenomena through a
particular lens (e.g., power, meaning-making, behavior
change), a theoretical framework (e.g., ) fits better
because it offers constructs (, ___) and propositions you’ll
use to interpret findings.
(b) Five literature-review steps with databases (10)
1. Define scope & questions
o Write 2–3 focused questions tied to your objectives
(e.g., How does ___ influence ___ in ___ context?).
2. Plan search strategy
o Keywords + synonyms + Boolean: ("primary school*"
OR "foundation phase") AND (literacy OR numeracy)
AND (intervention OR program*).
o Set date range (e.g., 2015–2025), peer-review filter.
3. Search multiple databases
o Google Scholar (broad), Scopus/Web of Science
(quality & citation trails), ERIC (education), PsycINFO
(behavior/learning), JSTOR (theory).
o Snowball: check reference lists & “cited by”.
4. Screen & appraise
2025 - DUE 4 September 2025; 100% TRUSTED
Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
Question 1 – Literature Review Design (20)
(a) Conceptual vs Theoretical Framework (10)
Conceptual framework
A map of the key concepts/variables in your study and how
you think they relate.
Built from prior literature and your context; may mix
multiple theories.
Purpose: guides data collection/analysis by clarifying what
to look for.
Theoretical framework
A single (or bounded set of) established theory(/ies) you
adopt to interpret the study.
Purpose: anchors your study in a formal explanatory lens
(e.g., Social Cognitive Theory, Critical Pedagogy).
How to decide (use one of these sentences and complete the
blanks):
If your study aims to test/examine relationships among
specific variables (e.g., X → Y → Z), a conceptual
framework is more appropriate because your focus is
, mapping constructs like ___, ___, and ___ and proposing
links such as ___.
If your study seeks to interpret phenomena through a
particular lens (e.g., power, meaning-making, behavior
change), a theoretical framework (e.g., ) fits better
because it offers constructs (, ___) and propositions you’ll
use to interpret findings.
(b) Five literature-review steps with databases (10)
1. Define scope & questions
o Write 2–3 focused questions tied to your objectives
(e.g., How does ___ influence ___ in ___ context?).
2. Plan search strategy
o Keywords + synonyms + Boolean: ("primary school*"
OR "foundation phase") AND (literacy OR numeracy)
AND (intervention OR program*).
o Set date range (e.g., 2015–2025), peer-review filter.
3. Search multiple databases
o Google Scholar (broad), Scopus/Web of Science
(quality & citation trails), ERIC (education), PsycINFO
(behavior/learning), JSTOR (theory).
o Snowball: check reference lists & “cited by”.
4. Screen & appraise