100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Tutorial 6- national and EU protection of Human Rights Constitutions Compared (5th Edition), ISBN: 9781780688831 Comparative Government (PUB1002/2020-200)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
25
Uploaded on
05-12-2020
Written in
2020/2021

Tutorial 6: Human Rights

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Summarized whole book?
Yes
Uploaded on
December 5, 2020
Number of pages
25
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

National and EU protection of Human Rights
Overview............................................................................................................................3
Judicial review....................................................................................................................3
Constitutional review of legislation....................................................................................3
Other types of judicial review.............................................................................................3
Constitutional Review of Legislation...................................................................................3
Arguments to justify the right for judges to review the constitutionality of legislation.......3
Arguments against the right for judges to review the constitutionality of legislation..........3
The Procedural Setting of Constitutional Review.................................................................5
Concrete review..................................................................................................................5
Abstract review..................................................................................................................5
Ex ante review....................................................................................................................5
Ex post review....................................................................................................................5
Decentralized system of review..........................................................................................5
Centralized system of review..............................................................................................5
US......................................................................................................................................5
Germany............................................................................................................................5
France................................................................................................................................5
United Kingdom.................................................................................................................5
The Netherlands.................................................................................................................6
Consequences.....................................................................................................................6
What exactly is the consequence of a judicial decision stating that a statute is
unconstitutional?...............................................................................................................6
Disapplication/ Invalidation/..............................................................................................6
Setting aside.......................................................................................................................6
Annulment/ declaring void.................................................................................................6
(further-reaching consequences)........................................................................................6
Germany............................................................................................................................6
US......................................................................................................................................6
Proceedings before the Court of Justice of the EU...............................................................6
Conclusion:.........................................................................................................................7
Review of Treaty Law Compliance......................................................................................7
Judges would test legislation for their compatibility with a higher norm............................7

,(Is the treaty law really a higher norm?).............................................................................7
Monism..............................................................................................................................7
Dualism..............................................................................................................................7
European Union Law..........................................................................................................9
Preliminary question........................................................................................................10
National courts.................................................................................................................10
The Court System..............................................................................................................11
UK....................................................................................................................................11
Constitutional review........................................................................................................11
International Treaties and the ECHR.................................................................................12
France..............................................................................................................................14
Constitutional review........................................................................................................14
International treaties and the ECHR..................................................................................15
Netherlands......................................................................................................................16
Constitutional review........................................................................................................16
International treaties and the ECHR..................................................................................17
Germany..........................................................................................................................18
Constitutional review........................................................................................................18
International treaties and ECHR........................................................................................20
USA..................................................................................................................................21
Constitutional review........................................................................................................22
International treaties and ECHR........................................................................................22
European Union................................................................................................................23
EU Courts..........................................................................................................................23
The ECJ (and the Court).....................................................................................................23
National Court and EU......................................................................................................23
The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.............................................................................24
(EU has developed its own Bill of Rights)..........................................................................24

, Overview
Judicial review  A judge can examine a legal decision or norm, or another
object of scrutiny, and check its compatibility with a higher
norm
 A judge may, depending on the system, test whether a
regional law is in harmony or in conflict with a higher,
national law
If the lower law provides rules that go against the provisions of the
higher law
 the judge, if he has review power, may establish a conflict
Constitutional  Judge may check whether an administrative decision by a
review of legislation public authority complies with the authorizing general
legislation
 depending on the system, examine the validity of a
national statute by setting it against the national
constitution
Example
 hypothetical review of the constitutionality of a criminal
provision that prescribes the death penalty whereas the
constitution bans the death penalty
Other types of  the judge may review the constitutionality of political
judicial review parties
 may review the compatibility of national law with general
principles of law, such as proportionality, or with an
international treaty, such as the European Convention on
Human Rights
 where applicable, check the compliance of treaties or acts
of international organizations with the national
constitution
Judicial review is thus a court’s power to detect conflicts in law,
and possibly to attach consequences to resolve the conflict
Constitutional Review of Legislation
Arguments to justify the right for judges to Arguments against the right for judges
review the constitutionality of legislation to review the constitutionality of
legislation
1. Judicial review guarantees the The constitution can very well be
supremacy of Constitution supreme, without frustrating the will of
 the constitution is the highest norm in a the lawmaker
legal system  The lawmaker should simply
 all other law derives from its authority take account of the
 legislation should not be allowed to constitution when passing
violate the constitution statutes in the first place, and
 judges should refuse to apply normal make the right choices itself,
statutes if they violate the constitution subject as it is to democratic
Having a constitution but no constitutional oversight from the voters
review powers for the courts would be pointless (democratically elected office-
 since the lawmaker could violate the holders vs unelected judges)
$6.58
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
Mariajohnson2
5.0
(1)

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Mariajohnson2 Maastricht University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
7
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
7
Documents
36
Last sold
2 year ago

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions