Prioritization of Care® v.2 Specialty Series: Advanced Medical Surgical Care
, here are your results:
Overview
Click a section’s title to view your latest attempt’s Detailed Feedback.
Section Score
Department Selection 9/10 (90%)
Patient Prioritization 9/10 (90%)
Intervention Selection 38/40 (95%)
Intervention Prioritization29/40 (72%)
0 10 20 30 40
Completion Score Time Spent Total Time
100% 85% 49m Spent
Complete 85/100 points Last attempt 4h 17m
3 total attempts
Attempt completed at August 13, 2025 at 07:00 (UTC). Report generated on August 13, 2025 at 07:10 (UTC).
All Attempts
Time Department Patient Intervention Intervention
# Start Date Progress Spent Selection Prioritization Selection Prioritization Total Score
#1 2025-08-13 05:59 25% 3h 15m 7/10 0/10 0/40 0/40 7/100 (7%)
#2 2025-08-13 06:11 25% 12m 6/10 5/10 0/40 0/40 11/100 (11%)
#3 2025-08-13 07:00 100% 4h 17m 9/10 9/10 38/40 29/40 85/100 (85%)
Feedback
Please provide product feedback by clicking the “SURVEY” button to
the right of this prompt. Your feedback is important for enhancing user
experience and achievement of outcomes for future learners.
Overview 1
, American Sentinel University
Alignment to Competencies
AACN Essentials
The simulation meets the following domains from the AACN Essentials:
KNOWLEDGE FOR PERSON-CENTERED SCHOLARSHIP FOR THE
POPULATION HEALTH QUALITY AND SAFETY
NURSING PRACTICE CARE NURSING DISCIPLINE
VIEW DOMAIN 1 VIEW DOMAIN 2 VIEW DOMAIN 3 VIEW DOMAIN 4 VIEW DOMAIN 5
Portions of these materials are taken from The Essentials: Core Competencies for Nursing Education. (“The Essentials”), which is
owned by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (“AACN”). Any licensing of The Essentials by AACN does not constitute
or imply any endorsement of any company and/or any of its products, services, or written work product. Click here to read the
full disclaimer.
NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model
Each section maps to the NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model (NCJMM).
On the last page of this report, Evaluate Outcomes using the EMPOWER® Debrief.
Recognize Analyze Prioritize Generate Take Evaluate
Cues Cues Hypotheses Solutions Action Outcomes
90 90 90 95 72 N/
% % % % % A
Maps to Maps to Maps to Maps to Maps to Maps to
Department Department Patient Intervention Intervention EMPOWER®
Selection Selection Prioritization Selection Prioritization Debrief
2
, American Sentinel University
Alignment to Competencies
NCLEX Client Needs Categories
Interventions made in this simulation are mapped to one or more Client Needs Categories.
A. Safe and Effective Care Environment D. Physiological Integrity
100 Management of Care 75 Basic Care and Comfort
% 4 actions map to this subcategory. % 4 actions map to this subcategory.
A
A. Safe and Effective Care Environment D. Physiological Integrity
N/A Safety and Infection Control 95 Pharmacological and Parenteral Therapies
0 actions map to this subcategory. % 20 actions map to this subcategory.
D
B. Health Promotion and Maintenance D. Physiological Integrity
B 100 11 actions map to this subcategory. 92 Reduction of Risk Potential
% % 13 actions map to this subcategory.
C. Psychosocial Integrity D. Physiological Integrity
C 100 1 action maps to this subcategory. 100 Physiologic Adaptation
% % 13 actions map to this subcategory.
3
, American Sentinel University
Section Summary
Department Selection
DepartmentScore
ICU 5/5 (100%)
Medical Clinic 4/5 (80%)
Department Selection Total 9/10 (90%)
0 5 10
Patient Prioritization
DepartmentScore
ICU 5/5 (100%)
Medical Clinic 4/5 (80%)
Patient Prioritization Total 9/10 (90%)
0 5 10
Intervention Selection
DepartmentScore
ICU 19/20 (95%)
Medical Clinic 19/20 (95%)
Intervention Selection 38/40 (95%)
Total
> Intervention Selection Per Patient
100% 4
75% 3
50% 2
25% 1
0% 0
KimberlyJim WoodsHimari Abe Bryce Herman Anna SimpsonSumetJulio PachoTy EvansLisa BevensKevin
HinesPrakashStapleton
ICU Medical Clinic
4