Assignment 1 QUIZ Semester 2 2025
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
Unique number:
Due Date: 2025
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
,8/7/25, 11:29 PM Assessment 1: Attempt review
RRLLB81-25-S2 > Welcome Message > Assessment 1
QUIZ
Startedon Thursday, 7 August 2025, 10:43 PM
State Finished
Completedon Thursday, 7 August 2025, 11:28 PM
Time taken 44 mins 54 secs
Feedback This is a multiple-choice assessment. It consists of 20 questions worth 5
marks each. Most of the questions in this assessment deal with the
contents of Tutorial Letter 102.
Question 1
Incorrect
Marked out of 5.00
Which one of these options (lists of cases) complies with the requirements for the
bibliographical listing of case law?
a. Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA) para 12
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC) 84
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ) 91
S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC) para 120
b. Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Comair Ltd v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
Sv Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
e. Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA)
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (1) SACR 79 (CC)
Comair Lid v South African Airways (Pty) Ltd 2017 (2) All SA 78 (GJ)
Sv Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/quiz/review. php? attempt=28582582&cmid=1257775 1/10
,8/7/25, 11:29 PM Assessment 1: Attempt review
Question 2
Correct
Marked out of 5.00
You want to cite p 205 of the following book in a footnote in your research paper:
Bibliographic information
Title Neethling on Personality Rights
Authors J. Neethling, J. M. Potgieter, Anneliese Roos
* Publisher LexisNexis Butterworths, 2019
ISBN 0409121924, 9780409121926
Length 490 pages
Directly below is a picture of the title page of the book.
Neethling
on
Personality Rights
J NEETHLING
BA LLB (UOVS) LLM (McGill) LLD (Unisa)
Emeritus Professor of Private Law, University of South Africa
Research Fellow of Private Law. University of the Free State
Advocate of the Supreme Court of South Africa
JM POTGIETER
Blur LLM (RAU) LLM (Harvard) LLD (Unisa)
Professor Extraordinanius of Private Law, University of Sowth Africa
Attorney, Notary and Conveyancer
A ROOS
BA LLB (UP) LLD (Unisa)
Professorof Private Law, Unwersity of South Africa
Advocate of the Supreme Court of South Africa
a. Neethling J, Potgieter JM and Roos Anneliese, Neethling on Personality
Rights (LexisNexis 2019) p 205.
b. J Neethling, JM Potgieter and A Roos, Neethling on Personality Rights (LexisNexis,
2019) 205.
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/quiz/review.
php? attempt=28582582&cmid=1257775 2/10
, 8/7/25, 11:29 PM Assessment 1: Attempt review
c. J. Neethling, J.M. Potgieter and A. Roos, Neethling on Personality Rights (LexisNexis
2019) 205.
d. JNeethling, JM Potgieter & A Roos, Neethling on Personality Rights (LexisNexis
2019) 205
e. JNeethling, JM Potgieter and A Roos, Neethling on Personality Vv
Rights (LexisNexis 2019) 205.
Question 3
Correct
Marked out of 5.00
Where should a footnote not be inserted in the main text? Choose one or more from the
answers below
a. Atthe very beginning of the quoted sentence, that is, before the quoted text. v
b. After a full stop, where the quotes ends.
c. Anywhere the author deems appropriate, it is matter of choice. ¥
d. After the name of the quoted author at the beginning of a sentence. v
e. After a coma, where the quotes ends.
Question 4
Correct
Marked out of 5.00
The main text of your research should be formatted in the following manner:
a. Must be typed in Arial font, size 12; must be centred.
b. Must be typed in Arial font, size 12; must be justified. v
c. Must be typed in Arial font, size 10; must be justified.
d. Must be typed in Arial font, size 11; must be justified.
e. Must be typed in New Roman Times font, size 12; must be justified.
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/quiz/review. php? attempt=28582582&cmid=1257775 3/10