100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

LPC Exam Notes - Dispute Resolution Workshop 8 (University of Law)

Rating
4.7
(3)
Sold
2
Pages
12
Uploaded on
12-11-2020
Written in
2020/2021

Complete notes covering Workshop 8 of the University of Law's Dispute Resolution Module. - Case and Costs Management - The Directions Questionnaire - Directions Order - Drafting a Case Summary - Pre-Trial Checklist - Case Management Conferences

Show more Read less
Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
November 12, 2020
Number of pages
12
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Answers

Subjects

Content preview

Case and Costs Management
Overview of the Procedure
1. When the defence has been filed, the court will provisionally decide which “track” to allocate the claim to.
2. The court will then send the parties’ a Notice of Proposed Allocation (NPA), which, for Multi-Track Claims,
will normally require the parties to:
 Complete a Directions Questionnaire (Form N181) by a specified date.
 Attempt to agree directions and then file proposed directions by a specified date.
 File and exchange cost budgets either:
a. With the DQ if the value of the claim is less than £50,000 (CPR 3.13)
b. In any other case, not later than 21 days before the first Case Management Conference (CPR
3.13).

Allocation

When defence is filed, the court provisionally decides which track the case will follow. It does this by:
 Serving each party, an NPA
 Requiring the Directions Questionnaire by a certain date (CPR 26.3)

Which track?
Small Claims Fast track Multi-track
CPR PT 27 CPR PT 28 CPR PT 29
Straight-forward claims of value not exceeding £10K, Claims worth between £10K and £25K Claims worth more than £25K.
although claims worth more than this may also be that can be tried in one day or less. Claims will go to the County Court if
allocated to this track (PD 26 para 8.1(2)). Only require one expert per party. (CPR straight-forward (debt action etc.)
26.6(4) & 28) and to the High Court if complex.
Will be heard in the County Court unless
they raise a point of public interest.
PD Para 2.6 lists the claims suitable for being tried *** (CPR 26.8) When deciding on which
in the RCJ, e.g. professional negligence. track to allocate the court must have
regard to;
If not in this list, transfer to County Court where - Value of the claim
value is less than £50K, or to the High Court District - Nature of remedy sought
Registry where value is over £50K. - Complexity of law/evidence
- Number of likely parties
For example: ‘This claim is suitable to be managed
and tried in the RCJ because it is a professional - Views expressed by parties
negligence claim worth over £50K and the witnesses - Circumstances of parties
are based in London.’ ***



The defendant can get an automatic transfer to a court more local to them under CPR26.2(1) if:
 The claim is for a specified sum;
 The court the claimant has begun proceedings in is not the defendant’s home court as defined in CPR 2.3;
 The defendant is an individual; or
 Any other defendants in the proceedings have not yet taken steps in the proceedings.

Post DQ; Allocation Hearing
Time Limits: 28 days after Deemed Service of NPA (4:30 business day rule except for post); Failure to comply = order
to comply within 7 days, failure to do so will result in a strike out.

Once all parties have filed their Directions Questionnaires, the court allocates the claim to a track.
 A party may appeal the allocation (if present at a hearing) or apply to court for reallocation (if no hearing was
held) (PD 26 Para 11).
 Parties must be given seven days’ notice of the Allocation Hearing.


1
$4.12
Get access to the full document:
Purchased by 2 students

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 3 reviews
3 year ago

3 year ago

4 year ago

4.7

3 reviews

5
2
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
izalpcnotes University of Law (London)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
353
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
197
Documents
20
Last sold
4 months ago
Legal Practice Course Exam Notes from a Distinction LLM LPC Student

Notes: All Core Modules: Dispute Resolution Business Law & Practice (coming soon) Real Estate (coming soon) Elective Modules: Mergers & Acquisitions Commercial Law & Practice (coming soon) Intellectual Property Law & Practice (coming soon)

4.4

98 reviews

5
55
4
38
3
1
2
1
1
3

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions