2 2025
Unique Number:
Due date: August 2025
QUESTION 1
The most suitable data collection strategy for this study is qualitative data collection,
particularly participatory qualitative methods such as focus group discussions (FGDs), in-
depth interviews, and participant observation.
Reasons for Choosing a Qualitative Strategy
1. Co-production of Knowledge
The study focuses on co-producing knowledge with local actors, which means the
participants are not just respondents but active contributors to the research.
Qualitative methods like FGDs allow for open dialogue and mutual learning between
researchers and community members, making it easier to explore local experiences,
beliefs, and ideas around gender-based violence in depth.
2. Exploring Social Realities
Gender-based violence (GBV) is a sensitive and complex social issue that involves
emotional, cultural, and power dynamics. Qualitative data collection helps to uncover
hidden narratives and deeper social meanings behind the experiences of victims and
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1
The most suitable data collection strategy for this study is qualitative data collection,
particularly participatory qualitative methods such as focus group discussions
(FGDs), in-depth interviews, and participant observation.
Reasons for Choosing a Qualitative Strategy
1. Co-production of Knowledge
The study focuses on co-producing knowledge with local actors, which means
the participants are not just respondents but active contributors to the
research. Qualitative methods like FGDs allow for open dialogue and mutual
learning between researchers and community members, making it easier to
explore local experiences, beliefs, and ideas around gender-based violence in
depth.
2. Exploring Social Realities
Gender-based violence (GBV) is a sensitive and complex social issue that
involves emotional, cultural, and power dynamics. Qualitative data collection
helps to uncover hidden narratives and deeper social meanings behind the
experiences of victims and community members—something that quantitative
surveys might miss.
3. Context-Specific Understanding
The use of qualitative methods allows the study to focus on contextual
knowledge, shaped by local culture, norms, and lived realities of the
Gqeberha community. This is especially useful in building advocacy strategies
that are meaningful and locally grounded.
Description of the Data Collection Strategy
Focus Group Discussions (FGDs)
FGDs will involve small groups (6–10 people) facilitated by a skilled moderator who
will guide participants through discussions on the causes, consequences, and
prevention of GBV. Participants may include community leaders, survivors, health
workers, youth, and activists. The collective nature of FGDs encourages participants