POL3702
ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 2 2025
UNIQUE NO.
DUE DATE: 2025
, Crime Prevention Principles for Policing IIIB
Question 1
1.1 Reasons why the media statement by Sgt Ngobese should be based on the
principle of equality and impartiality (10)
1. Protection of Human Rights: All individuals, including suspects and victims,
have constitutional rights, such as the right to dignity, privacy, and a fair trial.
Impartial statements help preserve these rights.
2. Avoidance of Bias: Impartial communication ensures that the police are not
seen as favoring one party over another, especially in high-profile cases involving
politicians.
3. Maintaining Public Trust: Fair and unbiased communication builds community
confidence in the SAPS and its operations.
4. Preventing Prejudice: Publicly naming suspects or victims without following due
legal process may lead to undue social stigma or influence judicial proceedings.
5. Compliance with SAPS Regulations: SAPS guidelines require officers to avoid
disclosing information that could compromise investigations or infringe on
individual rights.
6. Preventing Defamation and Legal Risks: Making unverified or discriminatory
statements could expose SAPS to lawsuits.
7. Upholding Professionalism: Objectivity in communication reflects the
professionalism of the SAPS and prevents speculation or misinformation.
8. Equal Treatment Before the Law: All individuals must be treated equally
regardless of their social, political, or economic status.
9. Sensitive Nature of the Incident: Given that a prominent politician was
involved, impartiality ensures that the case is not politicized.
10. Media Influence: The media plays a powerful role in shaping public opinion. An
impartial statement helps control the narrative responsibly and ethically.
ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 2 2025
UNIQUE NO.
DUE DATE: 2025
, Crime Prevention Principles for Policing IIIB
Question 1
1.1 Reasons why the media statement by Sgt Ngobese should be based on the
principle of equality and impartiality (10)
1. Protection of Human Rights: All individuals, including suspects and victims,
have constitutional rights, such as the right to dignity, privacy, and a fair trial.
Impartial statements help preserve these rights.
2. Avoidance of Bias: Impartial communication ensures that the police are not
seen as favoring one party over another, especially in high-profile cases involving
politicians.
3. Maintaining Public Trust: Fair and unbiased communication builds community
confidence in the SAPS and its operations.
4. Preventing Prejudice: Publicly naming suspects or victims without following due
legal process may lead to undue social stigma or influence judicial proceedings.
5. Compliance with SAPS Regulations: SAPS guidelines require officers to avoid
disclosing information that could compromise investigations or infringe on
individual rights.
6. Preventing Defamation and Legal Risks: Making unverified or discriminatory
statements could expose SAPS to lawsuits.
7. Upholding Professionalism: Objectivity in communication reflects the
professionalism of the SAPS and prevents speculation or misinformation.
8. Equal Treatment Before the Law: All individuals must be treated equally
regardless of their social, political, or economic status.
9. Sensitive Nature of the Incident: Given that a prominent politician was
involved, impartiality ensures that the case is not politicized.
10. Media Influence: The media plays a powerful role in shaping public opinion. An
impartial statement helps control the narrative responsibly and ethically.
