100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

THE ULTIMATE CHALLENGE ENERGY RECOVERY FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE - A SUPER HARD

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
28
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
25-06-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

THE ULTIMATE CHALLENGE ENERGY RECOVERY FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE - A SUPER HARD

Instelling
Hesi A2
Vak
Hesi A2










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Hesi A2
Vak
Hesi A2

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
25 juni 2025
Aantal pagina's
28
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

THE ULTIMATE CHALLENGE: ENERGY
RECOVERY FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE -
A SUPER HARD QUIZ
Difficulty Level: EXTREMELY HARD. This quiz is designed to test the deepest
understanding of energy recovery from municipal solid waste, encompassing
advanced technologies, intricate processes, and nuanced environmental and
economic considerations. Good luck!

Welcome to a comprehensive and extraordinarily challenging quiz on Energy
Recovery from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). This assessment is structured to
probe your understanding of diverse waste-to-energy technologies, their
underlying principles, operational intricacies, environmental ramifications,
economic drivers, and future prospects. Prepare to delve into the complex
world of thermal, biological, and emerging conversion processes, navigating
through the multifaceted challenges and opportunities associated with
transforming waste into a valuable resource.

This quiz is not merely about recalling facts but about applying critical
thinking to complex scenarios, differentiating between subtly similar
concepts, and understanding the practical implications of theoretical
knowledge. Each question is crafted to push the boundaries of your expertise
in this vital field of sustainable development and waste management.


SECTION 1: FUNDAMENTALS AND COMPOSITIONAL
NUANCES
1. Which of the following MSW compositional characteristics is LEAST directly
influential on the gross calorific value (GCV) but significantly impacts ash
fusion temperature and slagging potential in conventional grate incinerators?

• a) High cellulose content
• b) High moisture content
• c) High inorganic inert content (e.g., glass, ceramics)
• d) High lignin content
• e) High volatile matter content

,2. True or False: The concept of "lower heating value" (LHV) is generally
preferred over "higher heating value" (HHV) in waste-to-energy (WtE) plant
design calculations because it accounts for the latent heat of vaporization of
water produced during combustion, reflecting more accurately the usable
energy output in typical flue gas conditions.

3. Explain the term "biogenic fraction" in MSW and why its accurate
determination is crucial for carbon accounting in WtE facilities, particularly in
the context of renewable energy classifications and emissions trading
schemes.


SECTION 2: ADVANCED THERMAL CONVERSION
TECHNOLOGIES
SUB-SECTION 2.1: INCINERATION (WASTE-TO-ENERGY PLANTS)

4. In a modern moving grate incinerator, what is the primary purpose of
maintaining a specific furnace temperature range (e.g., >850°C for >2
seconds) as mandated by EU Waste Incineration Directive (WID)?

• a) To maximize steam production for electricity generation.
• b) To ensure complete oxidation of inorganic pollutants.
• c) To minimize NOx formation through thermal denaturation.
• d) To ensure complete destruction of persistent organic pollutants (e.g.,
dioxins, furans).
• e) To reduce unburnt carbon in the bottom ash.

5. True or False: Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) is an upstream flue gas
cleaning technology primarily used for the removal of particulate matter and
acid gases before entering the baghouse filter.

6. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of fluidized bed incinerators
compared to conventional grate incinerators for MSW, specifically considering
fuel flexibility, emissions profile, and operational stability. Provide a scenario
where one might be significantly preferred over the other.

, SUB-SECTION 2.2: GASIFICATION

7. Which of the following statements most accurately describes the primary
distinction between co-current (downdraft) and counter-current (updraft)
fixed-bed gasifiers in terms of syngas quality and tar content when
processing MSW-derived fuels?

• a) Downdraft produces higher tar content due to shorter residence time
in the reduction zone, while updraft produces lower tar.
• b) Updraft produces higher tar content due to tars passing through
cooler zones, while downdraft produces lower tar.
• c) Both produce similar tar content, but downdraft has higher char
conversion efficiency.
• d) Neither is suitable for MSW due to excessive tar formation.
• e) Downdraft is primarily for dry biomass, and updraft is only for coal.

8. True or False: The "equivalence ratio" in a gasification process is defined as
the actual air-to-fuel ratio divided by the stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratio for
complete combustion, and a typical value for gasification is significantly
greater than 1.

9. Detail the various applications of syngas produced from MSW gasification
beyond direct combustion for power generation. Discuss the necessary
syngas cleaning and conditioning steps required for these alternative
applications.

SUB-SECTION 2.3: PYROLYSIS

10. What is the key operational difference that dictates the relative yields of
bio-oil, char, and non-condensable gases in fast pyrolysis versus slow pyrolysis
of MSW, assuming similar feedstock?

• a) Reactor pressure and catalyst type.
• b) Heating rate and vapor residence time.
• c) Initial moisture content of the feedstock.
• d) Type of reactor material (e.g., stainless steel vs. ceramic).
• e) Oxygen concentration in the reactor.

11. True or False: Bio-oil derived from MSW pyrolysis typically has a higher
heating value than conventional diesel and requires minimal upgrading
before direct use in standard internal combustion engines.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
fritzhaber Walden University
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
49
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
47
Documenten
1432
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

4.3

3 beoordelingen

5
2
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen