Assignment 2
Due 20 June 2025
, HED4802
Assignment 2
Due 20 June 2025
Question 1: Evaluating Curriculum Design Through Four Paradigms of
Knowledge and Learning
Curriculum design and implementation are profoundly shaped by underlying paradigms
of knowledge and learning, each offering distinct perspectives on the aims, content,
teaching strategies, and assessment approaches in education. Below, I explore how
positivism, interpretivism, critical theory, and post-structuralism influence these
elements, drawing on examples to illustrate their impact in school settings.
Positivism
Positivism views knowledge as objective, universal, and measurable, emphasizing
empirical evidence and scientific methods. In curriculum design, positivism prioritizes
standardized aims, such as preparing students for measurable academic and vocational
outcomes. Knowledge selection focuses on factual, discipline-based content, like
mathematics or science, often organized into rigid syllabi (Young, 2013). Teaching
strategies under positivism rely on direct instruction and rote learning to transmit facts
efficiently, as seen in traditional lecture-based classrooms where teachers deliver
content and students memorize it. Assessment is typically summative, using
standardized tests to quantify student performance, such as South Africa’s National
Senior Certificate exams. While this approach ensures consistency, it may neglect
students’ diverse needs and contextual understanding, potentially alienating those who
don’t thrive in rigid systems.
Interpretivism
Interpretivism emphasizes subjective meaning and individual experiences, viewing