Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 35 pages
Exam (elaborations)

D395 ITEC 2034 Software Security & Testing- Objective Assessment - WGU 2025.

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 35 pages

D395 ITEC 2034 Software Security & Testing- Objective Assessment - WGU 2025.D395 ITEC 2034 Software Security & Testing- Objective Assessment - WGU 2025.D395 ITEC 2034 Software Security & Testing- Objective Assessment - WGU 2025.

Content preview

D385 ITEC 2034 Software Security &
Testing

Objective Assessment Review

(Questions & Solutions)

2025




©2025

, Question 1
A development team is tasked with simulating a real-world cyber attack
against a web application to evaluate its defense mechanisms. Which
approach best describes a “Red Team” exercise?
- A. Running automated vulnerability scans daily
- B. Conducting white‑box testing using source code analysis
- C. Orchestrating a covert, multi‑vector attack that includes social
engineering, exploit attempts, and lateral movements
- D. Executing a standard penetration test using off‑the‑shelf tools

ANS: C
Rationale: A Red Team exercise is an adversary simulation where
trained testers use multiple techniques (including social engineering and
covert exploits) to mimic a real attacker’s behavior, thereby providing a
realistic measure of the organization’s security posture.

---

Question 2
Which technique involves sending random, malformed, or unexpected
inputs to a software application to detect crashes, memory leaks, or
unhandled exceptions?
- A. Fuzz testing
- B. Unit testing
- C. Regression testing
- D. Stress testing

ANS: A
Rationale: Fuzz testing (or fuzzing) injects random or invalid input into
an application to trigger failures, uncovering security vulnerabilities such
as buffer overflows or input validation issues.

---
©2025

, Question 3
Static analysis in the context of software security primarily aims to:
- A. Execute the application to monitor its behavior under load
- B. Review the code without running it to identify potential
vulnerabilities
- C. Analyze network traffic generated by the application
- D. Simulate user interactions to test business logic

ANS: B
Rationale: Static analysis examines source code (or compiled code)
without executing it to detect defects, insecure coding practices, and
potential vulnerabilities early in the development life cycle.

---

Question 4
To mitigate SQL injection vulnerabilities in a Java-based web application,
which secure coding practice should be most rigorously applied?
- A. Using dynamic query concatenation based on user input
- B. Implementing input validation only on the client side
- C. Utilizing prepared statements with parameterized queries
- D. Relying on exception handling to catch injection attempts

ANS: C
Rationale: Prepared statements with parameterized queries bind
variables and separate SQL logic from the data, thereby effectively
preventing SQL injection attacks.

---

Question 5
During a security test of a web application, the QA team uses an
interception proxy to manipulate HTTP/HTTPS traffic. Which tool is most
commonly associated with this practice?
©2025

, - A. Selenium
- B. Burp Suite
- C. JMeter
- D. AppScan

ANS: B
Rationale: Burp Suite is widely used by security professionals to
intercept, modify, and analyze web traffic, making it a standard tool for
dynamic security testing and penetration testing.

---

Question 6
Which testing approach involves manually reviewing source code with
the goal of uncovering security flaws such as insecure APIs, improper
error handling, or lack of input sanitization?
- A. Automated regression testing
- B. Peer code review
- C. Dynamic analysis
- D. Load testing

ANS: B
Rationale: Peer code review is a manual process in which
knowledgeable developers scrutinize the source code to detect potential
security vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with secure coding
standards.

---

Question 7
A company adopts a methodology that incorporates security tests into
every phase of the development cycle—from code commit to production
deployment. This integrated approach is best described as:
- A. Ad hoc security testing
- B. DevSecOps
©2025

Document information

Uploaded on
May 28, 2025
Number of pages
35
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Unknown
$16.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EmilioOchieng
4.1
(24)
Sold
148
Followers
17
Items
4032
Last sold
3 months ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions