100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

apology plato summary

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
1
Geüpload op
24-05-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

apology plato summary

Instelling
Vak








Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Heel boek samengevat?
Ja
Geüpload op
24 mei 2025
Aantal pagina's
1
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

PiC - Plato’s Apology

Summary of the book:

Plato's "Apology" recounts Socrates' defense before the Athenian jury as he addresses
accusations of corrupting the youth and not believing in the city's gods.

Socrates says many people have spoken ill of him over the years to persuade the people of
Athens to distrust him. He explains that unlike the Sophists, Socrates has never accepted
money for his teachings, for he believes he doesn’t possess the “knowledge” necessary to do
such a thing, but that he has “human wisdom.” A friend of his traveled to Delphi and asked
the oracle if there is anyone wiser than Socrates, and the oracle told him there isn’t. To prove
this, Socrates goes around the city talking to poets, craftsmen and other wiser men than
himself. He comes to the conclusion that the apparent wise men thought of themselves as
very knowledgeable when in reality they were ignorant, and since Socrates is aware of his lack
of knowledge (“I know that I do not know”) he is therefore wiser than these men.

Since then, Socrates had been working to spread the Delphic oracle’s message that human
wisdom is “worthless” by unveiling the ignorance of men who are supposedly wise. In doing
so, he gained an unfavorable reputation as impious and philosophically contrarian who had
busied himself studying things in the sky and below the earth and spreading these
problematic ideas throughout Athens. But in truth, he was only working in service of the
Delphic oracle (and, thus, the god Apollo). He later points out the contradiction of Meletus’
accusations in regards to Socrates not believing in gods but teaching “spiritual things”, since
Meletus eventually admits that spirits are “either gods or the children of gods”. Socrates also
challenges Meletus's accusation of corrupting the youth by questioning how is it possible that
according to him, everyone contributes to the improvement of the children but Socrates alone
corrupts them. He then argues that corruption must be unintentional because if he made one
of his associates wicked he runs the risk of being harmed by him, so if he does corrupt, he
suggests that he should be taught to improve rather than be punished.

Socrates calmly accepts the possibility of a death sentence, asserting that fearing death is a
presumption of wisdom. As a result, he’d rather maintain his values and face the possibility of
death, although stating that if they execute him, they’ll be acting immorally. Even more, he
says that he should be rewarded by his service to his fellow Athenians. If the jury acquits him,
he says, he will continue to behave as he always has and maintain his service to god through
his teachings. The jury concludes that Socrates is guilty and sentenced to death. Socrates is
unfazed and asserts that he was convicted because he refused to tell the jury what they
wanted to hear or to debase himself through “lamentations and tears.” Emphasizing the fact
that he has only tried to help his fellow Athenians remain moral, he asks his listeners to make
sure they hold his sons accountable if they ever become greedy or foolish. “I go to die, you go
to live,” he says. “Which of us goes to the better lot is known to no one, except the god.”

Useful words to include:
Dialectic: Socrates' method of philosophical inquiry and discussion. Used to reach the truth.
Virtue: Areté, encompassing the idea of moral excellence or virtue in one's actions.
Sophos: Wisdom, emphasizing practical knowledge and good judgment.
Eudaimonia: Refers to human flourishing or living a fulfilling and virtuous life.
$5.50
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
alenajimnez

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
alenajimnez Universitat de Barcelona
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
0
Lid sinds
6 maanden
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
10
Laatst verkocht
-

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen