100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary LECTURES 1 - 8 RESEARCH METHODS FOR HEALTH SCIENCES

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
38
Uploaded on
01-09-2020
Written in
2019/2020

Complete lectures Research methods for health sciences

Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
September 1, 2020
Number of pages
38
Written in
2019/2020
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Research Methods in Health Sciences HC 1
introduction
Research Methods in Health Sciences HC 2
Research Perspectives


To do: Read chapter 1 and 2 of Gray
Aims:
 Understand differences between positivism (objectivist) and
interpretivism (constructivist) research perspectives
 get acquainted with different research methodologies
 Get acquainted with transdisciplinary research
 Understand the three guiding principles for a researcher
 Understand the concept of objectives
 Examples of research agenda’s



What is (the purpose of) research?
Biomedical: the purpose of health science is finding an objective,
generalizable, truth
Epistemology: what does it mean to know?



What are the perspectives of research?
First important question: Am I searching for an objective truth, laws about
the world or do you think the real world cannot be measured in this way,
and you believe that the understanding of underlying mechanism (in your
study context) is more important than generalizing.
 Positivism (objectivism)
 Presenting facts as truth
 Knowledge can be formulated into laws
 Reality as something ‘out there that is waiting to be found
 There is one single reality
 Natural sciences
 Interpretivism (constructivism)
 Truth and meaning are constructed by the researchers
interactions with the world
 As human beings our own presence as researchers influences
what we are trying to measure

,  Researchers are inherently view the world through their frame
of reference
 Multiple realities (are experienced), and meaning is not stable
 Social sciences




 different perspectives, different types of knowledge  need to integrate
all perspectives



Research methodologies
Believes, also those about truths, are leaps of faith. But not all leaps of
faith are equal. They are based on the collection and interpretation of
anecdotes [data]. We always collect and interpreted anecdotes. We check/
test if our interpretations are correct. The extent to which we can reduce
anecdotes to fragments that can be made distinguishable and have a
limited variability determines how we can analyze these.
How do I abstract data from the real world?
 Deductive: look at your data with clear units of analysis structured.
when there is a clear idea of what to look for
 Inductive: analyse data for emerging patterns  theory
unstructured. you don’t know what to look for
 not often purely deductive because you look at data and maybe change
your theory a bit.
 you can check inductive research with deductive research


Examples of methods:

,(Quasi) experimental: the independent variable is manipulated to
determine effect on the dependent variable so there is control over the
variables. Causality can be determined. The experiment could be
replicated and there are clear indicators to determine the outcome. The
aim of an experiment is to generalize and it is associated with positivism /
deductive approaches.
Analytical survey: this is used in observational studies to test theories in
the field or explore / determine associations / predictors. It’s about
measuring the world. Structured questions leads to control of variables.
There are limited options for respondents. Analytical surveys are highly
deductive and the aim is to generalize to a larger population.
Phenomological studies: to understand social reality this reality has to be
grounded in people’s experiences. This type produces thick descriptions of
peoples experiences and seeks subjective accounts and interpretations of
participants. Studies are relatively less structured and inductive, and the
epistemology is constructivism using qualitative data.
Case study research: is the inquiry of a phenomena in its real life setting.
It is the in depth analysis of a case (person, group, organisation, event).
The aim is to understand the world and critical factors / explain what will
happen. This study type uses mixed methods often with clear qualitative /
quantitative units of analysis. Can be either inductive of deductive.
(Participaroty) Action Research (PAR): there is collaboration between
researchers and practitioners and users to change practice. It’s about
transforming the world. This is of iterative design and uses mixed
methods. The aim is to understand perspectives in order to determine
change and measuring change. Deductive and inductive reasoning are
both used.


Research objectives: research is not only classified by the perspective or
methodology by also by its objectives.
 Exploratory
 Descriptive
 Explanatory
 Transformative
 Now you have selected methodology to address your topic, you need to
determine how you collect data. What methods are there? Structured
interview, observations, physical examination (drawing blood samples),
covert, photo voice, etc.



Research and transdisciplinary

, Most public health issues are complex problems that require inter- or
transdisciplinary research. But parts of these can be solved using a mono-
disciplinary focus.




Transdisciplinary research is a new form of learning and problem solving
involving co-operation between different parts of society and science in
order to meet complex challenges of society. TDR starts from tangible real
world problems. Solutions are devised in collaboration with multiple
stakeholders.
 Problem focussed: Qol, epidemiological, behavioural, environmental,
etc.
 Solution focussed: developing interventions, to assess interventions,
impact, etc.



What are the guiding principles for being a good researcher
1. Be a designer
2. Problematising is not taking anything for granted or at face value
3. Interpreting is relating to your data. How do you frame what is out
there?
The research outline is linear on paper but iterative in the making.
 Introduction (problem statement
 Theory and concepts
 Research question
 Objective/ main RQ
 Methodology
 Results
 Discussion
 Answer / conclusion
 New research question



Research designs + objectives and example of research
agenda’s

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
lotteslooter Maastricht University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
26
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
24
Documents
6
Last sold
2 year ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions