1
SOLUTION MANUAL FOR @pl @pl
American Government Political Development and Institutional Change By
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Cal Jillson
@pl @pl
Chapter 1-21
@pl @pl
Chapter 1 @pl
THE ORIGINS OF AMERICAN POLITICAL PRINCIPLES
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
FOCUS QUESTIONS
Q1 What are the broad purposes of government?
A1 The ancients believed the role of government and politics was to foster human
excellence. However, it is imperative to remember that the Greeks and Romans
believed the virtuous should rule according to natural law. Furthermore, values
of equality and order would be served through a society based upon the rule of
law to provide for the common good. In the Middle Ages, government was
largely used to facilitate religion and maintained the need for the individual to
live a proper life in the service of God. The role of government changed in the
early sixteenth century by downplaying the role of religion while alternatively
promoting the role of limited government to protect private property and
individual rights.
Q2 How should government be designed to achieve its purposes?
A2 According to Plato the philosopher-king’s wisdom and intellect would promote
order, stability and justice. Yet, Aristotle takes a more realistic view of Athenian
society by advocating the best form of government as a polity, which combined
oligarchic and democratic elements to produce political stability. The Romans
combined monarchical, aristocratic, and democratic principles as a mixed
government within representative bodies like the Senate and the Assembly in
order to champion the causes of both the rich and the poor. Government in the
Middle Ages was determined through divine right, whereby a monarch or Pope
was ordained by God to rule. Hence, wisdom and virtue rested within these few
individuals who governed to promote religious life and protect the religious
establishment. The Renaissance, Protestant Reformation, and Enlightenment
Periods shifted the role of government from upholding religious doctrine to
secular concerns, such as protecting inalienable rights, including private
property, and promoting commerce. In turn, Enlightenment political
philosophers largely appealed to individualism and not religious hierarchy as a
means to provide order and stability in which individuals could flourish.
, 2
Q3 What lessons about government did colonial Americans draw from the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
history of ancient Greece and Rome?
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
A3 Plato was suspicious of democracy’s rule of the many because good
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
government would decay into mob rule. Hence, the passions of the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
masses needed to be quelled by more aristocratic elements. With this
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
problem in mind, the Framers of the U.S. Constitution referenced the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
institutional design of the Roman republic adhered to the tradition of
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
mixed government initially expounded by Aristotle and the Romans. This
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
was maintained in the indirect selection of both the Senate and the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
presidency within the Constitution. Aristotle also advocated mixing
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
aristocratic and democratic elements in a governing structure called a
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
polity. In effect, this governmental design allowed the few and the many
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
to participate in the politics providing an orderly society where the poor
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
should be able to select government officials who were held accountable.
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
This was also made manifest in the Constitution with its aristocratic-like
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Senate and the more democratic House of Representatives. Thus the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
American republic’s Constitution established institutional powers to govern
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
according to the rule of law. While the Framers rejected the religious
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
hierarchy of the Middle Ages, they appealed to inalienable rights
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
endowed upon every individual by God, per the writings of John Locke,
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
in which a just government and society could not be impeded.
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Q4 What circumstances led Europeans to leave their homelands to settle in
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
America?
@pl
A4 Individuals immigrated to the colonies to escape religious persecution and
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
civil unrest after the English Civil War and to pursue social and
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
economic opportunities. Colonists enjoyed a vast array of natural
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
resources and a large geographical area where freedom of religion and
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
economic opportunity flourished. Also, their heterogeneous social
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
composition as well as continual promotion of ideals, such as equality
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
and tolerance, tended to promote political freedom at the same time
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
that social expansion of the population was occurring.
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Q5 What did democracy mean to our colonial ancestors, and did they approve it?
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
A5 The colonists were skeptical of democracy and viewed this type of
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
governing authority as mob rule. Society was largely seen as segmented
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
into those who should rule and those who should not. In fact, the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Founders believed that the elite (well-educated, land owners) should
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
occupy positions of leadership. Thus, an aristocratic element within
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
government was necessary to protect against the threat of mob rule
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
historically associated with democracy. Fundamentally, the idea of
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
republicanism was promoted as an ideal at a higher level than
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
, 3
@pl
democracy. This was made most manifest in the tendency to prefer
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
@pl
mixed
, 4
constitutional schemes over single-body regimes, such as monarchies,
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
aristocracies, and democracies. It was in this respect that our colonial
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
ancestors were both innovative and critical of extant governmental
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
forms yet simultaneously wedded to the past, especially the Greco-
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Roman Ancients. @pl
CHAPTER OUTLINE @pl
I. A Tradition to Draw From
@pl @pl @pl @pl
History and experience provided lessons upon which the Founders referenced in
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
designing American political institutions.
@pl @pl @pl @pl
A. The Ancients: Who Rules and for What Purpose?
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
The philosophy of Plato and Aristotle was concerned with structuring
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
a society, known as a city-state, and based upon human nature:
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Speech and reason as the fundamental characteristics of humans.
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Thus, the political community or polis is designed according to the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
virtues and abilities of its inhabitants.
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
1. The Greeks: Monarchy, Aristocracy, Democracy @pl @pl @pl @pl
a. According to Aristotle, the purpose of politics is to create an @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
order that fosters human excellence. Plato’s leader was the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
philosopher king. Since Plato doubted the reality of this
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
king, he concluded that good government would be@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
uncommon and short lived. Plato and particularly Aristotle
@pl @pl @pl @pl @ p l @pl @pl @pl
identified three forms of government: @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
1) Monarchy—rule by one leader @pl @pl @pl
2) Aristocracy—rule by a few good men @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
3) Democracy—rule by the many @pl @pl @pl
b. Aristotle also theorized that governments would decay. Thus, @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
monarchy decays into tyranny through despotic actions of a
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
single ruler. Second, aristocracy decays into oligarchy
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
whereby the few rule to advance their self-interests
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
contrary to the common good. Finally, democracy decays
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
into mob rule as the masses rule according to their
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
passions. @pl
c. Aristotle’s additional contribution: Political order based on reality @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
1) Aristotle’s contribution was pragmatic by addressing @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
the needs of the wealthy and the masses within a @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
society to form a mixed government. @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
2) He believed that oligarchy and democracy are the @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
most common regimes. Therefore, the best @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
elements of each might be combined and made into @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
a good, workable, and stable government. He called @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
this form “polity.” @pl @pl @pl
2. The Romans: Republicanism and Mixed Government @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
a. The Romans, notably Polybius and Cicero, believed that @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
SOLUTION MANUAL FOR @pl @pl
American Government Political Development and Institutional Change By
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Cal Jillson
@pl @pl
Chapter 1-21
@pl @pl
Chapter 1 @pl
THE ORIGINS OF AMERICAN POLITICAL PRINCIPLES
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
FOCUS QUESTIONS
Q1 What are the broad purposes of government?
A1 The ancients believed the role of government and politics was to foster human
excellence. However, it is imperative to remember that the Greeks and Romans
believed the virtuous should rule according to natural law. Furthermore, values
of equality and order would be served through a society based upon the rule of
law to provide for the common good. In the Middle Ages, government was
largely used to facilitate religion and maintained the need for the individual to
live a proper life in the service of God. The role of government changed in the
early sixteenth century by downplaying the role of religion while alternatively
promoting the role of limited government to protect private property and
individual rights.
Q2 How should government be designed to achieve its purposes?
A2 According to Plato the philosopher-king’s wisdom and intellect would promote
order, stability and justice. Yet, Aristotle takes a more realistic view of Athenian
society by advocating the best form of government as a polity, which combined
oligarchic and democratic elements to produce political stability. The Romans
combined monarchical, aristocratic, and democratic principles as a mixed
government within representative bodies like the Senate and the Assembly in
order to champion the causes of both the rich and the poor. Government in the
Middle Ages was determined through divine right, whereby a monarch or Pope
was ordained by God to rule. Hence, wisdom and virtue rested within these few
individuals who governed to promote religious life and protect the religious
establishment. The Renaissance, Protestant Reformation, and Enlightenment
Periods shifted the role of government from upholding religious doctrine to
secular concerns, such as protecting inalienable rights, including private
property, and promoting commerce. In turn, Enlightenment political
philosophers largely appealed to individualism and not religious hierarchy as a
means to provide order and stability in which individuals could flourish.
, 2
Q3 What lessons about government did colonial Americans draw from the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
history of ancient Greece and Rome?
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
A3 Plato was suspicious of democracy’s rule of the many because good
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
government would decay into mob rule. Hence, the passions of the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
masses needed to be quelled by more aristocratic elements. With this
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
problem in mind, the Framers of the U.S. Constitution referenced the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
institutional design of the Roman republic adhered to the tradition of
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
mixed government initially expounded by Aristotle and the Romans. This
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
was maintained in the indirect selection of both the Senate and the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
presidency within the Constitution. Aristotle also advocated mixing
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
aristocratic and democratic elements in a governing structure called a
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
polity. In effect, this governmental design allowed the few and the many
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
to participate in the politics providing an orderly society where the poor
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
should be able to select government officials who were held accountable.
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
This was also made manifest in the Constitution with its aristocratic-like
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Senate and the more democratic House of Representatives. Thus the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
American republic’s Constitution established institutional powers to govern
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
according to the rule of law. While the Framers rejected the religious
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
hierarchy of the Middle Ages, they appealed to inalienable rights
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
endowed upon every individual by God, per the writings of John Locke,
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
in which a just government and society could not be impeded.
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Q4 What circumstances led Europeans to leave their homelands to settle in
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
America?
@pl
A4 Individuals immigrated to the colonies to escape religious persecution and
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
civil unrest after the English Civil War and to pursue social and
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
economic opportunities. Colonists enjoyed a vast array of natural
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
resources and a large geographical area where freedom of religion and
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
economic opportunity flourished. Also, their heterogeneous social
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
composition as well as continual promotion of ideals, such as equality
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
and tolerance, tended to promote political freedom at the same time
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
that social expansion of the population was occurring.
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Q5 What did democracy mean to our colonial ancestors, and did they approve it?
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
A5 The colonists were skeptical of democracy and viewed this type of
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
governing authority as mob rule. Society was largely seen as segmented
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
into those who should rule and those who should not. In fact, the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Founders believed that the elite (well-educated, land owners) should
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
occupy positions of leadership. Thus, an aristocratic element within
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
government was necessary to protect against the threat of mob rule
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
historically associated with democracy. Fundamentally, the idea of
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
republicanism was promoted as an ideal at a higher level than
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
, 3
@pl
democracy. This was made most manifest in the tendency to prefer
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
@pl
mixed
, 4
constitutional schemes over single-body regimes, such as monarchies,
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
aristocracies, and democracies. It was in this respect that our colonial
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
ancestors were both innovative and critical of extant governmental
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
forms yet simultaneously wedded to the past, especially the Greco-
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Roman Ancients. @pl
CHAPTER OUTLINE @pl
I. A Tradition to Draw From
@pl @pl @pl @pl
History and experience provided lessons upon which the Founders referenced in
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
designing American political institutions.
@pl @pl @pl @pl
A. The Ancients: Who Rules and for What Purpose?
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
The philosophy of Plato and Aristotle was concerned with structuring
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
a society, known as a city-state, and based upon human nature:
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Speech and reason as the fundamental characteristics of humans.
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
Thus, the political community or polis is designed according to the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
virtues and abilities of its inhabitants.
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
1. The Greeks: Monarchy, Aristocracy, Democracy @pl @pl @pl @pl
a. According to Aristotle, the purpose of politics is to create an @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
order that fosters human excellence. Plato’s leader was the
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
philosopher king. Since Plato doubted the reality of this
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
king, he concluded that good government would be@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
uncommon and short lived. Plato and particularly Aristotle
@pl @pl @pl @pl @ p l @pl @pl @pl
identified three forms of government: @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
1) Monarchy—rule by one leader @pl @pl @pl
2) Aristocracy—rule by a few good men @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
3) Democracy—rule by the many @pl @pl @pl
b. Aristotle also theorized that governments would decay. Thus, @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
monarchy decays into tyranny through despotic actions of a
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
single ruler. Second, aristocracy decays into oligarchy
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
whereby the few rule to advance their self-interests
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
contrary to the common good. Finally, democracy decays
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
into mob rule as the masses rule according to their
@pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
passions. @pl
c. Aristotle’s additional contribution: Political order based on reality @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
1) Aristotle’s contribution was pragmatic by addressing @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
the needs of the wealthy and the masses within a @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
society to form a mixed government. @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
2) He believed that oligarchy and democracy are the @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
most common regimes. Therefore, the best @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
elements of each might be combined and made into @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
a good, workable, and stable government. He called @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
this form “polity.” @pl @pl @pl
2. The Romans: Republicanism and Mixed Government @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
a. The Romans, notably Polybius and Cicero, believed that @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl @pl
