Question 1
The textual piece below is taken from the prescribed textbook: Seroto et al. (2020),
“Decolonising education in the Global South: historical and comparative international
perspectives”, from Chapter 3: Indigenous history and education before colonial times. Read the
extract below, and then answer the questions that follow.
Extract from the text: Education through practice
The indigenous people of southern Africa developed their own methods of sharing knowledge through
teaching practical skills. In most instances teaching was through showing, with different skill sets
demonstrated for the younger generation to observe. In Southern Africa, the San people who survived
by hunting and food gathering for thousands of years, used Stone Age tools to cut up the animals that
they hunted. Even though the San were using Stone Age technology, they were very skilled in killing
animals. To hunt they used, among other tools, bows, arrows, snares, and slow poison technologies.
The bow and arrow method was used to hunt large game such as antelope, buffalo, or eland. The
hunter would stalk the game to within about 20m, which is the average distance an arrow can fly.
Instead of killing animals instantly, which was not easy because the arrow had no fletching and often
missed the target, the San used poisoned arrows to kill the game. The animal would be poisoned
slowly to death, which took a few hours to a few days depending on the size of the animal. The
sources of the poison were caterpillars, the larvae of a small beetle, poisonous plants, and snake
venom, which were put on the arrow. When the arrow struck an animal, the hunters would have to
track it until it died. Once the animal fell, the San would cut around the poisoned area and discard the
poisoned meat. The Khoi, just like the San people were also skilled at making weapons.
Archaeologists discovered that the San also used snares to capture prey as early as 70 000 years ago
(Wadley, 2010). Traps and snares have an economic dimension since they reduce the cost of a long
search prey, by bringing the animal to the hunter, rather than requiring that the hunter goes after
animal (Wadley, 2010). Since the prey was captured remotely, these devices created the time and
space for hunters to engage in other activities that included social activities such as rituals.
Among the many ways to trap animals, the San would dig funnel-shaped pits near rivers, place a sharp
stake in the middle of the pit and cover it with branches. San hunters were expected to observe and
understand their prey’s behaviour before they set a snare. The snare that the San set was designed to
function without human agency. These snares and traps have provided evidence that indigenous people
could grasp and incorporate action across space and time (Wynn & Coolidge, 2003). Snares are also an
apt demonstration of high-level cognition because they operate out-of-sight, but not out-of-mind
(Wadley, 2010).
This non-formal technology education was passed down from generation to generation. The hunting
techniques that the San used had been in existence for centuries and were passed onto the younger
generations. These hunter-gatherers were able to mark seasons of the year and knew precisely where
the plants they used for food and for medicine grew. They also knew how to collect plants and roots
without damaging the environment. An environmental skill that the San had was their ability to follow
the migration of antelope herds in order to locate where they could get water, so that they would not go
thirsty. The San used bowls for cooking whereas the Khoi used vessels for storing water (Bollong,
Smith & Sampson, 1997). Traditionally, the San used empty ostrich shells to store water which they
carried as bottles (see Figure 3.3). These bottles were often buried in the sand to keep the water cool.