Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Complete Test Bank Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73! RATED A+

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
252
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
28-03-2025
Written in
2024/2025

Complete Test Bank Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73! RATED A+Complete Test Bank Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73! RATED A+Complete Test Bank Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73! RATED A+Complete Test Bank Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73! RATED A+Complete Test Bank Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider 4th Edition (Edmunds, 2014), Chapter 1-73! RATED A+

Show more Read less
Institution
Pharmacology For Primary Provider 4th Ed
Course
Pharmacology for primary provider 4th ed

Content preview

TEST BANK FOR
ll ll




PHARMACOLOGYFOR
ll l




PRIMARYPROVIDER
ll l




4TH EDITION
ll ll




EDMUNDS
ll

,Chapter 01: Prescriptive Authority and Role Implementation: Tradition vs.
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll

Change
ll Test Bank
l l ll




MULTIPLE llCHOICE

1. Which llof llthe llfollowing llhas llinfluenced llan llemphasis llon llprimary llcare lleducation llin
medical
ll l l schools?
a. Changes llin llMedicare llreimbursement
l l methods llrecommended llin ll1992


b. Competition lfrom lnonphysicians ldesiring
l l to llmeet llprimary llcare llshortages


c. The llneed llfor llmonopolistic llcontrol llin
llthe l l marketplace llof llprimary lloutpatient

llcare
d. The llrecognition llthat llnonphysicians llhave
ll variable llsuccess llproviding llprimary
llcare
ANS: l l A
The llPhysician llPayment llReview llCommission llin ll1992 lldirectly llincreased llfinancial
l l reimbursement llto llclinicians llwho llprovide llprimary llcare. llCoupled llwith lla llshortage llof

l l primary llcare llproviders, llthis llincentive llled llmedical llschools llto llplace llgreater llemphasis

llon l l preparing llprimary llcare llphysicians. llCompetition llfrom llnonphysicians llincreased

l l coincidentally llas llprofessionals llfrom llother lldisciplines llstepped llup llto llmeet llthe llneeds.

Nonphysicians llhave llhad llincreasing llsuccess llat llproviding llprimary llcare lland llhave llbeen
l l shown llto llbe llsafe lland lleffective.




DIF: Cognitive llLevel: llRemembering ll(Knowledge) REF: ll ll2

2. Which llof llthe llfollowing llstatements llis lltrue llabout llthe llprescribing llpractices llof llphysicians?
a. Older llphysicians lltend llto llprescribe
llmore l l appropriate llmedications llthan

llyounger l l physicians.


b. Antibiotic llmedications llremain llin llthe
lltop l l five llclassifications llof llmedications

l l prescribed.


c. Most llphysicians llrely llon lla ll“therapeutic
l l armamentarium” llthat llconsists llof llless

llthan l l 100 lldrug llpreparations llper

llphysician.
d. The lldominant llform llof lldrug llinformation
l lused llby llprimary llcare llphysicians
llcontinues l l to llbe llthat llprovided llby
llpharmaceutical l l companies.



ANS: l l D
Even llthough llmost llphysicians llclaim llto llplace lllittle llweight llon lldrug lladvertisements,




1

, pharmaceutical llrepresentatives, lland llpatient llpreference lland llstate llthat llthey llrely llon
l l academic llsources llfor lldrug llinformation, lla llstudy llshowed llthat llcommercial llrather llthan

l l scientific llsources llof lldrug llinformation lldominated lltheir lldrug llinformation llmaterials.

l l Younger llphysicians lltend llto llprescribe llfewer lland llmore llappropriate lldrugs. lAntibiotics

llhave l l dropped llout llof llthe lltop llfive llclassifications llof lldrugs llprescribed. llMost

llphysicians llhave lla l l therapeutic llarmamentarium llof llabout ll144 lldrugs.




DIF: Cognitive llLevel: llRemembering ll(Knowledge) REF: ll ll3

3. As llprimary llcare llnurse llpractitioners ll(NPs) llcontinue llto lldevelop lltheir llrole llas
ll prescribers llof l l medications, llit llwill llbe llimportant llto:
a. attain llthe llsame lllevel llof llexpertise
llas l l physicians l l who l l currently

l l prescribe l l medications.



b. learn llfrom llthe llexperiences llof llphysicians
l l and lldevelop llexpertise llbased llon

llevidence- l l based llpractice.


c. maintain llcollaborative lland
llsupervisorial l l relationships llwith

llphysicians llwho llwill l l oversee

llprescribing llpractices.
d. develop lrelationships llwith lpharmaceutical
l l representatives llto lllearn llabout llnew

l l medications llas llthey llare lldeveloped.



ANS: l l B
As llnonphysicians lldevelop llthe llroles llassociated llwith llprescriptive llauthority, llit llwill llbe
l l important llto lllearn llfrom llthe llpast llexperiences llof llphysicians lland llto lldevelop

llprescribing l l practices llbased llon llevidence-based llmedicine. llIt llis llhoped llthat llall

llprescribers, llincluding l l physicians lland llnurse llpractitioners, llwill llstrive llto lldo llbetter

llthan llin llthe llpast. llNPs llshould l l work lltoward llprescriptive llauthority lland llfor llpractice

llthat llis llnot llsupervised llby llanother l l professional. llPharmaceutical llrepresentatives

llprovide llinformation llthat llcarries llsome llbias. l l Academic llsources llare llbetter.




DIF: Cognitive llLevel: llApplying ll(Application) REF: ll ll4

Chapter 02: Historical Review of Prescriptive Authority: The Role of Nurses (NPs,
l ll ll ll ll l ll ll ll ll ll

CNMs, CRNAs, and CNSs) and Physician Assistants
ll ll ll ll ll ll l


Test Bank
l




MULTIPLE llCHOICE

1. A llprimary llcare llNP llwill llbegin llpracticing llin lla llstate llin llwhich llthe llgovernor llhas llopted
llout llof l l the llfederal llfacility llreimbursement llrequirement. llThe llNP llshould llbe llaware
llthat llthis lldefines l l how llNPs llmay llwrite llprescriptions:




2

, a. without llphysician llsupervision llin llprivate
l l practice.



b. as llCRNAs llwithout llphysician llsupervision
l l in lla llhospital llsetting.



c. in llany llsituation llbut llwill llnot llbe
llreimbursed l l for llthis llby llgovernment

llinsurers.
d. only llwith llphysician llsupervision llin
llboth l l private llpractice lland lla llhospital
llsetting.
ANS: l l B
In ll2001, llthe llCenters llfor llMedicare lland llMedicaid llServices llchanged llthe llfederal
llphysician l l supervision llrule llfor llCRNAs llto llallow llstate llgovernors llto llopt llout,

llallowing llCRNAs llto llwrite l l prescriptions lland lldispense lldrugs llwithout llphysician

llsupervision.




DIF: Cognitive llLevel: llUnderstanding ll(Comprehension) REF: ll ll9

2. CRNAs llin llmost llstates:
a. must llhave lla llDrug llEnforcement
l l Administration ll(DEA) llnumber llto

llpractice.
b. must llhave llprescriptive llauthority
llto l l practice.


c. order lland lladminister llcontrolled llsubstances
l l but lldo llnot llhave llfull llprescriptive

llauthority.
d. administer llmedications, llincluding
l l controlled llsubstances, llunder

lldirect l l physician lsupervision.



ANS: l l C
Only llfive llstates llgrant llindependent llprescriptive llauthority llto llCRNAs. llCRNAs lldo llnot
l l require llprescriptive llauthority llbecause llthey lldispense lla lldrug llimmediately llto lla llpatient

lland l l do llnot llprescribe. llWithout llprescriptive llauthority, llthey lldo llnot llneed lla llDEA

lnumber.




DIF: Cognitive llLevel: llUnderstanding ll(Comprehension) REF: ll ll9

3. A lCNM:
a. may lltreat llonly llwomen.
b. has llprescriptive llauthority llin llall ll50 llstates.
c. may lladminister llonly lldrugs llused
llduring l l labor lland lldelivery.


d. may llpractice llonly llin llbirthing llcenters
lland l l home llbirth llsettings.



ANS: l l B

Written for

Institution
Pharmacology for primary provider 4th ed
Course
Pharmacology for primary provider 4th ed

Document information

Uploaded on
March 28, 2025
Number of pages
252
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$15.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Edunursepro Chamberlain College Of Nursng
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
170
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
8
Documents
10024
Last sold
4 days ago
STUDY HUB

4.0

47 reviews

5
28
4
5
3
6
2
3
1
5

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions