100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

PSY 3102 second midterm notes chapter 6 questions with answers

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
24-03-2025
Written in
2024/2025

Social exchange theory - Attempts to explain all types of relationships, from ones with your friends and parents to ones with romantic partner - Argues that relationships are based on exchange of resources, with added costs and benefits to each relationship Equity theory - Homans (1961) wrote: The open secret of human exchange is to give the other man behavior that is more valuable to him than it is costly to you and to get from him behavior that is more valuable to you than it is costly to him Van Yperen and Buunk 1990 - 736 participants (437 females) tested over 2 time periods for satisfaction in relationship (1 year apart) Sprecher 2001 - Studied 101 romantic couples over 5 years - Men and women satisfaction and commitment were assessed Thibaut & Kelley model - Propose that people use a Comparison Level (CL): = summarizes what people expect to get or deserve from a relationship - Think of it as a threshold for satisfaction: if what you receive from relationship exceeds your CL, you are satisfied; if it does not, you are dissatisfied - NB: quantity and also quality of what you receive from relationship are important Types of relationships - Level 1: Attractive Stability - Level 2: Attractive Instability - Level 3: Unattractive Stability - Level 4: Unattractive Instability - Support for Level 2 and Level 4 leading to relationship's end Commitment - Being in a relationship -> reduces attractiveness of alternatives Investment model - Level of investment in relationship influences attraction and dependence Commitment depends on what? - Tangible events - Intangible events - Planned investments Commitment (Le & Agnew 2003) - Meta-analysis of 52 studies, testing Investment Model Communal relationships - Can be differentiated from exchange relationships - In communal relationships there is no expectations of return of favours Lemay & Clark 2008 - Evidence indicates that holding a communal orientation facilitates creation of interdependence, which further promotes formation of close relationships - Study found that partners with communal orientation were more likely to engage in relationship-promoting behaviours Bartz & Lyndon 2006 Individual's attachment style - Securely attached: prefer communal situations - Anxiously attached: also prefer communal situations, but are less comfortable in them - Avoidantly attached: disliked those who followed communal norms Clark & Mills 1979 - Methods: participants (single hetero males), completed words - Participants sent a letter to the woman, who sent back either a letter + thank you or just a thank you - Next stage: participants found out that woman was either married and new to town or single and new to town - Confederate: either 'married and new to town' or 'single and new to town' Add or remove terms You can also click the terms or definitions to blur or reveal them Review

Show more Read less
Institution
Psyc3102
Course
Psyc3102








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Psyc3102
Course
Psyc3102

Document information

Uploaded on
March 24, 2025
Number of pages
2
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

PSY 3102 second midterm notes chapter
6 questions with answers Graded A+

Social exchange theory - answers- Attempts to explain all types of relationships, from
ones with your friends and parents to ones with romantic partner
- Argues that relationships are based on exchange of resources, with added costs and
benefits to each relationship

Equity theory - answers- Homans (1961) wrote: The open secret of human exchange is
to give the other man behavior that is more valuable to him than it is costly to you and to
get from him behavior that is more valuable to you than it is costly to him

Van Yperen and Buunk 1990 - answers- 736 participants (437 females) tested over 2
time periods for satisfaction in relationship (1 year apart)

Sprecher 2001 - answers- Studied 101 romantic couples over 5 years
- Men and women satisfaction and commitment were assessed

Thibaut & Kelley model - answers- Propose that people use a Comparison Level (CL): =
summarizes what people expect to get or deserve from a relationship
- Think of it as a threshold for satisfaction: if what you receive from relationship exceeds
your CL, you are satisfied; if it does not, you are dissatisfied
- NB: quantity and also quality of what you receive from relationship are important

Types of relationships - answers- Level 1: Attractive Stability
- Level 2: Attractive Instability
- Level 3: Unattractive Stability
- Level 4: Unattractive Instability
- Support for Level 2 and Level 4 leading to relationship's end

Commitment - answers- Being in a relationship -> reduces attractiveness of alternatives

Investment model - answers- Level of investment in relationship influences attraction
and dependence

Commitment depends on what? - answers- Tangible events
- Intangible events
- Planned investments

Commitment (Le & Agnew 2003) - answers- Meta-analysis of 52 studies, testing
Investment Model

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
DESTINYGRACE Harvard university
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
13
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
5
Documents
2124
Last sold
4 weeks ago
TESTBANK,AQA AND ALLSTUDY MATERIALS

IM MY SHOP YOU WILL FIND DOCUMENTS ,PACKAGE DEELS AND ALLEXAMS BY DESINYGRACE

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions