APC3703
assignmen
ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2025
UNIQUE CODE: 578593
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
DUE DATE: 04 April 2025
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning,
comparison and reference purpose,
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the
contents of this document as your own work,
Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise
or misuse this document.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this
document, however the contents are provided “as
is” without any representations or warranties,
express or implied. The author assumes no
liability as a result of reliance and use of the
contents of this document. This document is to
be used for comparison, research and reference
purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or
by any means.
, 0688120934
PREVIEW
Critically Evaluating the ‘Revolutionary Situation’ That Led to the Peaceful Ouster
of Bouteflika
Introduction
The resignation of Algeria‘s long-time president, Abdelaziz Bouteflika, in 2019 marked a
significant political turning point in the country‘s modern history. Unlike the violent
uprisings of the Arab Spring in 2011, Algeria‘s Hirak movement was a peaceful yet
powerful revolutionary force that ultimately led to Bouteflika‘s removal. This movement
emerged in response to deep-seated socio-political and economic grievances that had
been simmering for decades. As Serres (2022) articulates, the concept of a
‗revolutionary situation‘ provides a useful analytical framework to understand the
dynamics of this transition. This essay critically evaluates the ‗revolutionary situation‘
that led to Bouteflika‘s peaceful ouster by examining the political, economic, and social
factors that contributed to the Hirak movement. It also explores the role of state
repression, the influence of historical memory, and the broader regional context in
shaping the uprising. By engaging with Serres‘ (2022) perspective, this paper highlights
the structural conditions that made this political transition possible and discusses
whether the movement can be classified as a true revolution.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is”
without any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as
a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for
comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
, 0688120934
Critically Evaluating the ‘Revolutionary Situation’ That Led to the Peaceful Ouster
of Bouteflika
Introduction
The resignation of Algeria‘s long-time president, Abdelaziz Bouteflika, in 2019 marked a
significant political turning point in the country‘s modern history. Unlike the violent
uprisings of the Arab Spring in 2011, Algeria‘s Hirak movement was a peaceful yet
powerful revolutionary force that ultimately led to Bouteflika‘s removal. This movement
emerged in response to deep-seated socio-political and economic grievances that had
been simmering for decades. As Serres (2022) articulates, the concept of a
‗revolutionary situation‘ provides a useful analytical framework to understand the
dynamics of this transition. This essay critically evaluates the ‗revolutionary situation‘
that led to Bouteflika‘s peaceful ouster by examining the political, economic, and social
factors that contributed to the Hirak movement. It also explores the role of state
repression, the influence of historical memory, and the broader regional context in
shaping the uprising. By engaging with Serres‘ (2022) perspective, this paper highlights
the structural conditions that made this political transition possible and discusses
whether the movement can be classified as a true revolution.
Understanding the Concept of a Revolutionary Situation
The concept of a "revolutionary situation" has been a subject of extensive debate
among scholars of political science, sociology, and history. At its core, a revolutionary
situation refers to a moment in time when the existing political order faces a profound
crisis, making the possibility of radical change more likely (Serres, 2022). However, not
all revolutionary situations lead to successful revolutions, as factors such as state
repression, elite control, and international influences can shape the outcome.
Classical theorists such as Lenin (1917) argue that a revolutionary situation arises when
―the lower classes do not want to live in the old way, and the upper classes cannot carry
on in the old way.‖ This perspective emphasizes the dual crisis of both state legitimacy
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is”
without any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as
a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for
comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
assignmen
ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2025
UNIQUE CODE: 578593
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
DUE DATE: 04 April 2025
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning,
comparison and reference purpose,
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the
contents of this document as your own work,
Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise
or misuse this document.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this
document, however the contents are provided “as
is” without any representations or warranties,
express or implied. The author assumes no
liability as a result of reliance and use of the
contents of this document. This document is to
be used for comparison, research and reference
purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or
by any means.
, 0688120934
PREVIEW
Critically Evaluating the ‘Revolutionary Situation’ That Led to the Peaceful Ouster
of Bouteflika
Introduction
The resignation of Algeria‘s long-time president, Abdelaziz Bouteflika, in 2019 marked a
significant political turning point in the country‘s modern history. Unlike the violent
uprisings of the Arab Spring in 2011, Algeria‘s Hirak movement was a peaceful yet
powerful revolutionary force that ultimately led to Bouteflika‘s removal. This movement
emerged in response to deep-seated socio-political and economic grievances that had
been simmering for decades. As Serres (2022) articulates, the concept of a
‗revolutionary situation‘ provides a useful analytical framework to understand the
dynamics of this transition. This essay critically evaluates the ‗revolutionary situation‘
that led to Bouteflika‘s peaceful ouster by examining the political, economic, and social
factors that contributed to the Hirak movement. It also explores the role of state
repression, the influence of historical memory, and the broader regional context in
shaping the uprising. By engaging with Serres‘ (2022) perspective, this paper highlights
the structural conditions that made this political transition possible and discusses
whether the movement can be classified as a true revolution.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is”
without any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as
a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for
comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
, 0688120934
Critically Evaluating the ‘Revolutionary Situation’ That Led to the Peaceful Ouster
of Bouteflika
Introduction
The resignation of Algeria‘s long-time president, Abdelaziz Bouteflika, in 2019 marked a
significant political turning point in the country‘s modern history. Unlike the violent
uprisings of the Arab Spring in 2011, Algeria‘s Hirak movement was a peaceful yet
powerful revolutionary force that ultimately led to Bouteflika‘s removal. This movement
emerged in response to deep-seated socio-political and economic grievances that had
been simmering for decades. As Serres (2022) articulates, the concept of a
‗revolutionary situation‘ provides a useful analytical framework to understand the
dynamics of this transition. This essay critically evaluates the ‗revolutionary situation‘
that led to Bouteflika‘s peaceful ouster by examining the political, economic, and social
factors that contributed to the Hirak movement. It also explores the role of state
repression, the influence of historical memory, and the broader regional context in
shaping the uprising. By engaging with Serres‘ (2022) perspective, this paper highlights
the structural conditions that made this political transition possible and discusses
whether the movement can be classified as a true revolution.
Understanding the Concept of a Revolutionary Situation
The concept of a "revolutionary situation" has been a subject of extensive debate
among scholars of political science, sociology, and history. At its core, a revolutionary
situation refers to a moment in time when the existing political order faces a profound
crisis, making the possibility of radical change more likely (Serres, 2022). However, not
all revolutionary situations lead to successful revolutions, as factors such as state
repression, elite control, and international influences can shape the outcome.
Classical theorists such as Lenin (1917) argue that a revolutionary situation arises when
―the lower classes do not want to live in the old way, and the upper classes cannot carry
on in the old way.‖ This perspective emphasizes the dual crisis of both state legitimacy
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is”
without any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as
a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for
comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
