100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Logical Fallacies - Week 12 & 13 Exam Questions and Answers 100% Pass

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
23
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
02-02-2025
Written in
2024/2025

Logical Fallacies - Week 12 & 13 Exam Questions and Answers 100% Pass APPEAL TO AUTHORITY - Illegitimately arguing that a statement is true because an authority fi1111 said so, especially when the statement is outside the authority figure's :111 .1 , ,I expertise. Philosophy is useless. 7he astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson said so. AD HOMINEM (AGAINST THE PERSON) - Criticizing the person who makes a claim or argument rather than criticizing the claim or argument itself PERSON 1: 7he federal government shouldn't raise the minimum wage because that would lead to a lot of poor people losing their jobs. PERSON 2: You don't really care about poor people! You're just a se(fish, rich jerk who is worried that goods and services will become more expensive for you personally if the minimum wage goes up. ANECDOTAL FALLACY - Using personal anecdotes or vivid examples, rather than adequate data, to support a broad generalization. 2Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 My great-grandmother smoked four packs a day for seventy years, and she never, got lung cancer. 7herefore, cigarettes don't really cause lung cancer. APPEAL TO IGNORANCE (AD IGNORATIUM) - Arguing that something is true because it can't be proven false. PERSON 1: Airplanes are secretly spraying chemicals to control our minds! PERSON 2: 7hat s a nonsense conspiracy theory. PERSON 1: Can you prove that its not happening? APPEAL TO NATURE - Arguing that something is good because it's natural or that it's bad because it's unnatural or artificial. It's much better to treat illness using natural herbs than with pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceuticals are full of artificial chemicals! APPEAL TO POPULARITY (AD POPULUM) - Arguing that something is true because everyone believes it or that something is good because everyone likes it. Most Americans agree that the death penalty deters crime. 7herefore, the death penalty does deter crime. CIRCULAR REASONING (BEGGING THE QUESTION) - Including or assuming your conclusion as one of your premises-often as a hidden

Show more Read less
Institution
Logical Fallacies
Course
Logical Fallacies










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Logical Fallacies
Course
Logical Fallacies

Document information

Uploaded on
February 2, 2025
Number of pages
23
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

Logical Fallacies - Week 12 & 13 Exam
Questions and Answers 100% Pass


APPEAL TO AUTHORITY - ✔✔Illegitimately arguing that a statement is true because

an authority fi1111 said so, especially when the statement is outside the authority

figure's :111 .1 , ,I expertise.


Philosophy is useless. 7he astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson said so.


AD HOMINEM (AGAINST THE PERSON) - ✔✔Criticizing the person who makes a

claim or argument rather than criticizing the claim or argument itself


PERSON 1: 7he federal government shouldn't raise the minimum wage because that

would lead to a lot of poor people losing their jobs.


PERSON 2: You don't really care about poor people! You're just a se(fish, rich jerk who

is worried that goods and services will become more expensive for you personally if the

minimum wage goes up.


ANECDOTAL FALLACY - ✔✔Using personal anecdotes or vivid examples, rather than

adequate data, to support a broad generalization.




Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 1

,My great-grandmother smoked four packs a day for seventy years, and she never, got

lung cancer. 7herefore, cigarettes don't really cause lung cancer.


APPEAL TO IGNORANCE (AD IGNORATIUM) - ✔✔Arguing that something is true

because it can't be proven false. PERSON 1: Airplanes are secretly spraying chemicals to

control our minds! PERSON 2: 7hat s a nonsense conspiracy theory.


PERSON 1: Can you prove that its not happening?


APPEAL TO NATURE - ✔✔Arguing that something is good because it's natural or that

it's bad because it's unnatural or artificial.


It's much better to treat illness using natural herbs than with pharmaceuticals.

Pharmaceuticals are full of artificial chemicals!


APPEAL TO POPULARITY (AD POPULUM) - ✔✔Arguing that something is true

because everyone believes it or that something is good because everyone likes it.


Most Americans agree that the death penalty deters crime. 7herefore, the death penalty

does deter crime.


CIRCULAR REASONING (BEGGING THE QUESTION) - ✔✔Including or assuming

your conclusion as one of your premises-often as a hidden premise.


PERRSON 1: 7his salesman is trustworthy; he's not going to try to sell me something I

don't need just to get the commission.




Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 2

, PERSON 2: How do you know?


PERSON 1: He told me that all he wants is to help me find the best deal.


COMPOSITION - ✔✔Illegitimately arguing that because something is true of each part

of something, it's also true of the whole; or that because something is true of each

member of a group, it's true of the group as a whole.


My greenhouse gas emissions don't make any difference to the climate. Nor does my

neighbor's, or my friend's, or any other individual's emissions. 1herefore, humanity's

greenhouse gas emissions don't make any difference to the climate.


DIVISION - ✔✔Illegitimately arguing that because something is true of a group or thing

as a whole, it's also true of each part.


The United States is rich. 1herefore, all Americans are rich.


EQUIVOCATION - ✔✔Using the same word or phrase in two different ways to make it

seem like an argument that works when it really doesn't.


This school is a drug-free zone. Caffeine is a drug, and coffee has caffeine in it.

Therefore coffee isn't allowed in this school


FALSE DICHOTOMY (FALSE DILEMMA) - ✔✔Falsely assuming that there are only

two options in order to argue for oa11 111 1hcm simply by arguing against the other.




Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 3

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
BrittieDonald Howard Community College
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
399
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
162
Documents
20443
Last sold
1 week ago
BrittieDonald Study Solutions.

Get Help in Your Due Online and Actual Exams, Assignments with Well Researched and Up-to date Study Materials for Guaranteed Success

3.4

83 reviews

5
35
4
13
3
7
2
5
1
23

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions