100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

FLETC Exam 2 Questions and Answers Latest Update 2025 Already Passed

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
13
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
01-02-2025
Written in
2024/2025

FLETC Exam 2 Questions and Answers Latest Update 2025 Already Passed Confession - Answers acknowledgement of guilt Admission - Answers o incriminating statement falling short of a confession (does not involve entire crime) o Can be explicit (nod head in agreeance) or implicit (she had it coming) "Person" in terms of the 5th - Answers o human being (corporation/business does not apply under 5th) triggered if the gov compels a confession or admission that is testimonial and incriminating "Shall be compelled" in terms of the 5th - Answers : must be voluntary, product of suspect's free choice, free will cannot be overborne by gov conduct: threats, violence, false promises o truthfulness of confession or admission is not the issue what do courts look at to determine if statement is voluntary - Answers totality of the facts and circumstances: suspects Characteristics, Circumstances, officers Conduct Voluntariness suspect characteristics - Answers age, education, intelligence (ability to understand right/wrong, what is going on, understand charge against them), known psychological issues, physical condition/health, drug/alcohol impairment, familiarity with legal system, understand english Voluntariness of officer conduct - Answers coercive (violence or threats of violence, threats, false promises), administer drugs, expliot a mental issue examples of non-coercive tactics - Answers promise to advise prosecutor of suspect's cooperation, confronting suspect with evidence of guilt, emotional appeals, deception/trickery (lie about matching DNA, witness), truthfully inform of legal predicament "In any criminal case" as it relates to the 5th - Answers if the statement could be used to prosecute, the privileges applies even ifo Prosecution is not imminent or likely o Person is not suspect at the time of the statement o Applies if the person is testifying in: another criminal trial, civil trial, deposition, or administrative hearing testimonial evidence - Answers communicates facts or discloses information from a person's own mind spoken words, written words, gestures, or actions examples of non-testimonial evidence - Answers fingerprints, hand writting, voice samples, blood samples, sobriety test when is the 5th privilege against self incrimination applicable - Answers when communication is compelled by the government, is testimonial, AND incriminating Voluntariness Circumstances - Answers § : where was the statement made (in home v in cuffs at station), length of questioning, were breaks offered or taken, was suspect in custody or free to leave, excessive heat or cold statements can be voluntary if suspect is in custody or under arrest what is considered incriminating - Answers information that contains reasonable fear that it could be used to convict the person of crime, furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed in a prosecution, lead to incriminating evidence, or identify sources of possible incriminating evidence examples of when a person does not have Privilege under the 5th because statements cannot be used to prosecute - Answers statute of limitations has expired, double jeopardy, immunity in what circumstances does Privilege not afford protection to a communicator - Answers incriminating someone other than themselves, exposing themselves to civil liability, deportation, or adverse admin/financial consequence, exposing subject or someone else to physical danger/unpleasant circumstances, prosecution for crime in another country three types of immunity - Answers use/statutory, transactional, act of production "to be a witness" in terms of the 5th - Answers deals with testimonial evidence only (spoken or written words, gestures) anything that communicates facts of info from the suspect's mind "against himself" in terms of the 5th - Answers cannot be asserted to protect someone else, witness to a crime with no criminal liability no P production of business or tax records in possession of third party - no P privilege against compelled self-incrimination may be asserted in what kinds of proceedings - Answers · criminal trial o Civil trial o Grandy jury o Non-trial hearings o Admin hearing o Investigations what does Miranda NOT require an officer to tell the suspect - Answers § right to stop questioning § topics of questioning: questioned about any crime, not just the crime of arrest what are the three C's that require Miranda rights to be read - Answers COPS, CUSTODY, C(UESTIONING) COPS, in terms of Miranda rights requirements - Answers gov dominated atmosphere required known LEO (in uniform or not) Miranda not required: confidential informant, undercover officer when is Miranda not required - Answers confidential informant, undercover officer CUSTODY, in terms of Miranda rights requirements - Answers in official control - arrest, jail, or detained to the degree associated with formal arrest (would reasonable person believe they are under arrest) (informed that they are free to leave or not under arrest? Not physically restrained?) C(UESTIONING), in terms of Miranda rights - Answers interrogation is asking express investigative questions or the "functional equivalent" of questions (officers talking with one another is not considered questioning) what is not considered questioning in terms of Miranda - Answers § Spontaneous statements § Public safety § Officer safety § Routine booking questions § Terry stops (not custody)

Show more Read less
Institution
FLETC
Course
FLETC









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
FLETC
Course
FLETC

Document information

Uploaded on
February 1, 2025
Number of pages
13
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

FLETC Exam 2 Questions and Answers Latest Update 2025 Already Passed

Confession - Answers acknowledgement of guilt

Admission - Answers o incriminating statement falling short of a confession (does not involve entire
crime)

o Can be explicit (nod head in agreeance) or implicit (she had it coming)

"Person" in terms of the 5th - Answers o human being (corporation/business does not apply under 5th)
triggered if the gov compels a confession or admission that is testimonial and incriminating

"Shall be compelled" in terms of the 5th - Answers : must be voluntary, product of suspect's free choice,
free will cannot be overborne by gov conduct: threats, violence, false promises

o truthfulness of confession or admission is not the issue

what do courts look at to determine if statement is voluntary - Answers totality of the facts and
circumstances: suspects Characteristics, Circumstances, officers Conduct

Voluntariness suspect characteristics - Answers age, education, intelligence (ability to understand
right/wrong, what is going on, understand charge against them), known psychological issues, physical
condition/health, drug/alcohol impairment, familiarity with legal system, understand english

Voluntariness of officer conduct - Answers coercive (violence or threats of violence, threats, false
promises), administer drugs, expliot a mental issue

examples of non-coercive tactics - Answers promise to advise prosecutor of suspect's cooperation,
confronting suspect with evidence of guilt, emotional appeals, deception/trickery (lie about matching
DNA, witness), truthfully inform of legal predicament

"In any criminal case" as it relates to the 5th - Answers if the statement could be used to prosecute, the
privileges applies even ifo Prosecution is not imminent or likely

o Person is not suspect at the time of the statement

o Applies if the person is testifying in: another criminal trial, civil trial, deposition, or administrative
hearing

testimonial evidence - Answers communicates facts or discloses information from a person's own mind



spoken words, written words, gestures, or actions

examples of non-testimonial evidence - Answers fingerprints, hand writting, voice samples, blood
samples, sobriety test

, when is the 5th privilege against self incrimination applicable - Answers when communication is
compelled by the government, is testimonial, AND incriminating

Voluntariness Circumstances - Answers § : where was the statement made (in home v in cuffs at
station), length of questioning, were breaks offered or taken, was suspect in custody or free to leave,
excessive heat or cold



statements can be voluntary if suspect is in custody or under arrest

what is considered incriminating - Answers information that contains reasonable fear that it could be
used to convict the person of crime, furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed in a prosecution, lead
to incriminating evidence, or identify sources of possible incriminating evidence

examples of when a person does not have Privilege under the 5th because statements cannot be used
to prosecute - Answers statute of limitations has expired, double jeopardy, immunity

in what circumstances does Privilege not afford protection to a communicator - Answers incriminating
someone other than themselves, exposing themselves to civil liability, deportation, or adverse
admin/financial consequence, exposing subject or someone else to physical danger/unpleasant
circumstances, prosecution for crime in another country

three types of immunity - Answers use/statutory, transactional, act of production

"to be a witness" in terms of the 5th - Answers deals with testimonial evidence only (spoken or written
words, gestures) anything that communicates facts of info from the suspect's mind

"against himself" in terms of the 5th - Answers cannot be asserted to protect someone else,



witness to a crime with no criminal liability no P



production of business or tax records in possession of third party - no P

privilege against compelled self-incrimination may be asserted in what kinds of proceedings - Answers ·
criminal trial

o Civil trial

o Grandy jury

o Non-trial hearings

o Admin hearing

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
TutorJosh Chamberlain College Of Nursing
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
359
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
16
Documents
29332
Last sold
1 day ago
Tutor Joshua

Here You will find all Documents and Package Deals Offered By Tutor Joshua.

3.6

55 reviews

5
19
4
14
3
12
2
0
1
10

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions