100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Final Exam | HTHSCI 3G03 Questions & Answers(RATED A+)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
20
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
21-11-2024
Written in
2024/2025

Evidence-Based Medicine - ANSWERThe conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. Evidence-Informed Practice - ANSWERRequires integration of individual clinical expertise and patient preferences with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research and consideration of available resources. The 3 Components of Critical Appraisal - ANSWER1) Internal Validity The ability of study results to support a cause and effect relationship between the treatment and the observed outcome 2) External Validity The applicability of study results to patients 3) Precision The degree of certainty that the findings are unlikely due to chance Peer Review - ANSWERWhen other researchers and/or clinicians, and presumably the editor of the journal have given their opinions on the merits of the journal. They comment usually on the study design, the relevance of the topic to the clinical community, and sometimes the power or precision. The Hierarchy of Evidence - ANSWER Pragmatic vs. Explanatory - ANSWER Therapy Questions - ANSWERAddresses issues of benefit and are the most commonly & widely-asked type of research question. They are used to determine the effects of interventions/treatments on certain outcomes. Harm Questions - ANSWERSimilar to therapy questions in that they compare the effects of interventions on patient outcomes; only, they focus on rare harmful events. Diagnostic Validity Questions - ANSWERFrames the question in terms of the validity of a new diagnostic test. This question typically compares a new diagnostic method with an established one. Risk Questions - ANSWERAsked to determine a population's risk of developing a target condition or disease. Prognosis Questions - ANSWERAsked to determine the prognosis factors that influence the course of a specific disease. PICOT - ANSWERPopulation Intervention Comparison/Control Outcome Timeframe Hypothesis - ANSWER- Are the researchers still working toward proof of concept or do they want to use their results to make conclusions that are applicable to patients? - Are the researchers seeking to replace usual care with an intervention they believe will work better? - Are the researchers seeking to replace an effective intervention with one that may be less effective because it is less costly or more easily administered? - Are the researchers seeking to declare that one intervention is interchangeable with another intervention? Equality Study - ANSWER- The new treatment is no different than the control

Show more Read less
Institution
| HTHSCI 3G03
Course
| HTHSCI 3G03










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
| HTHSCI 3G03
Course
| HTHSCI 3G03

Document information

Uploaded on
November 21, 2024
Number of pages
20
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

Final Exam | HTHSCI 3G03 Questions &
Answers(RATED A+)
Evidence-Based Medicine - ANSWERThe conscientious, explicit, and judicious use
of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients.

Evidence-Informed Practice - ANSWERRequires integration of individual clinical
expertise and patient preferences with the best available external clinical evidence
from systematic research and consideration of available resources.

The 3 Components of Critical Appraisal - ANSWER1) Internal Validity
The ability of study results to support a cause and effect relationship between the
treatment and the observed outcome

2) External Validity
The applicability of study results to patients

3) Precision
The degree of certainty that the findings are unlikely due to chance

Peer Review - ANSWERWhen other researchers and/or clinicians, and presumably
the editor of the journal have given their opinions on the merits of the journal. They
comment usually on the study design, the relevance of the topic to the clinical
community, and sometimes the power or precision.

The Hierarchy of Evidence - ANSWER

Pragmatic vs. Explanatory - ANSWER

Therapy Questions - ANSWERAddresses issues of benefit and are the most
commonly & widely-asked type of research question.

They are used to determine the effects of interventions/treatments on certain
outcomes.

Harm Questions - ANSWERSimilar to therapy questions in that they compare the
effects of interventions on patient outcomes; only, they focus on rare harmful events.

Diagnostic Validity Questions - ANSWERFrames the question in terms of the validity
of a new diagnostic test.

This question typically compares a new diagnostic method with an established one.

Risk Questions - ANSWERAsked to determine a population's risk of developing a
target condition or disease.

,Prognosis Questions - ANSWERAsked to determine the prognosis factors that
influence the course of a specific disease.

PICOT - ANSWERPopulation
Intervention
Comparison/Control
Outcome
Timeframe

Hypothesis - ANSWER- Are the researchers still working toward proof of concept or
do they want to use their results to make conclusions that are applicable to patients?

- Are the researchers seeking to replace usual care with an intervention they believe
will work better?

- Are the researchers seeking to replace an effective intervention with one that may
be less effective because it is less costly or more easily administered?

- Are the researchers seeking to declare that one intervention is interchangeable with
another intervention?

Equality Study - ANSWER- The new treatment is no different than the control

- Relies on the p value for interpretation

Superiority Study - ANSWER- The new treatment is better than the control

- Relies on a definition of "superiority" or "better than"

Non-Inferiority Study - ANSWER- The new treatment is no worse than the control

- Relies on a definition of "non-inferiority" or "worse than"

Equivalence Study - ANSWER- The new treatment is no better nor worse than the
control (i.e., equivalent to)

- Relies on a definition of "superiority" and "non-inferiority"

Health (WHO Definition) - ANSWER"A state of complete physical, mental, and social
well-being"

- Changes in concept as circumstances and experiences change

Indirect Measurement - ANSWERProxy or Surrogate Measurement
(e.g., bone mineral density, cholesterol level, BP, functional performance)

Direct Measurement - ANSWERPatient-Important Measurement
(e.g., quality of life, incident of events)

Measurement Properties - ANSWER- Reliability

, - Validity
- Sensitivity to Change
- Responsiveness

Purpose of Measurement - ANSWERTo assess for:
- Discriminative Outcomes
- Predictive Outcomes
- Evaluative Outcomes

Discriminative Outcomes - ANSWERUsed to discriminate or differentiate between
individuals

Some examples of how they're used:
- To determine eligibility for study participation
- To classify individuals as negative or positive for disease

Predictive Outcomes - ANSWERUsed to predict future events

Examples:
- Who is likely to succeed? (e.g., MCAT Test)
- Who is likely to have a bad outcome?

Evaluative Outcomes - ANSWERUsed to assess change, and most commonly used
to measure the effectiveness of an intervention.

Examples:
- Which treatment will effect the most weight loss?
- Which treatment will heal the wound the fastest?

Surrogate Outcomes - ANSWERBelieved to proxy or predict outcomes that are
directly important to patients.
- Appropriate for smaller, explanatory, or proof-of-concept studies
- Used to make strong recommendations for practice change, research studies
should report outcomes that are directly important to patients

Examples include:
- Performance-based tests (e.g., the 6-minute walk test — a proxy for mobility)
- Physiological tests (e.g., cholesterol level — a proxy for cardiovascular events)

Patient-Important Outcomes - ANSWERDirectly important outcomes to patients.
- Appropriate for larger, pragmatic, or real-life studies
- These research studies can make strong recommendations for practice change (or
not) depending on the study findings

Examples include:
- Quality of Life
- Death
- Rehospitalization
- Stroke/Heart Attack
- Recurrence, etc.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
papersbyjol West Virginia
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
421
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
253
Documents
13986
Last sold
2 weeks ago

3.8

72 reviews

5
27
4
18
3
17
2
2
1
8

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions