100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary - Social Media (LIX017B05)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
21
Uploaded on
06-11-2024
Written in
2024/2025

Summary of all lectures for the course Social Media

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
November 6, 2024
Number of pages
21
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Social media
Summary lectures
G. Mills
Exam: 23-06-2022

Week 1: Introduction

Basic concepts:
- Centralization
- Platform vs. Publisher

Some revision: decentralized internet
- Centralized → e.g. broadcasting

Decentralized: network of networks (internet infrastructure)

Social media: (re-) centralizes control
E.g. Facebook re-centralization of control

(De)centralized control in social media

Centralized:
- E.g. email lists, message boards, reddit, facebook
- All communication passes through a central point of control
- Benevdent dictators = controller has a dictatorial control

Distributed:
- E.g. file-sharing torrents, some music-streaming and chat applications, diaspora (social
networking service), bitcoin, Ethereum and other blockchain technologies.
- Communication is peer-to-peer
- Lack of central node makes absolute control very difficult → almost
impossible to switch off/censor

Multiple reasons why control is necessary:
- Spam, flaming, fraud, sensitive topics, PR

Social media provide levels of control over their basic elements, e.g.
Restricting who can:
- Create
- Edit
- Read
- Invite
- Respond
- Subscribe

, - Share

Deciding the right kinds of barriers to entry is fundamentally important!

Closed systems:
- High levels of control
- Provide details before logging in (email, validated credit card)
- Limited access to content until verified
- Exclude “social deviants”
- Problem = reduces the community size and the number of contributions

Open systems:
- Less control, more anonymity
- Greater potential for spam and advertising
- But openness can attract high quality posts and self-regulation of spam

Control structures influence how social media sites are governed

Control: freedom of speech → is James Wright Foley

Facebook: policy change
- Permits pictures of violence, including executions and beheadings
- As long as the user does not express support
But,
- Facebook bans images of breasts
- Even of breastfeeding

Are social media publishers or platforms?
Platforms:
- Telephone
- Post
- SMS
- DHL
→ Very limited responsibility for what is transmitted
Publishers: Newspapers, books, films
- Make editorial decisions
- Strong legal responsibility
- Twitter/Facebook are increasingly positioning themselves as news sites

Question:
- How much control turns a platform into a publisher
- What are the criteria for Twitter taking control (banning, deleting)
- Who (or what) should control the flow of information

, Algorithmic curation of news (feed)
Before:
- All friend’s posts displayed in your feed
- Content ordered by time

Now: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram
- You see less than <20% of what your friends post
- Content is curated by algorithms
→ Hidden
→ Reordered
→ Promoted
→ Content is placed around ads to increase clicks on ads

“We learn based on what you’ve done in the past and we quickly learn about the things that
you’re interested in”

Facebook: news feed visibility

NVF = Post x Interest x Creator x Type x Recency

(simplified equation, 100.000 other factors)

Facebook’s solution: trending topics

Publishers, platforms, algorithms

Social media companies are walking a fine line between a neutral platform to host news, and a
subjective media company that creates/curates it.

The algorithms are becoming increasingly “social” but still requiring (some) human oversight &
control

→ Boundary between social algorithm (AL) vs. human is becoming increasingly
blurred

“The value of a (decentralized) communication network is proportional to the square of the
number of its users

Value of network = (number of users) ^2 → Metcalfe’s law

Quantity has its own quality

- People use a (social media) technology because everyone else is using it

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
prmrijnders Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
23
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
9
Last sold
1 month ago

3.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions