Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

Communication and leadership course knowledge clips summary

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
29
Uploaded on
16-10-2024
Written in
2024/2025

This is a summary of all lectures/knowledge clips in the subject communication & leadership at Utrecht University. This course is part of the social, health and organisational psychology master of the social influence track.

Institution
Course

Content preview

Communication & leadership
Web lectures week 1
1.1 Introduction
Effective interaction in theory and practice.
Focus on effective interaction / communication.
Interpersonal and (small) groups.
Processes of influence.
Skills in context (person & environment).

1.2 Five axioms of human communication
Pragmatics of human communication:
- Syntactics: transmitting information.
- Semantics: meaning of communication.
- Pragmatics: behavioral effects of communication (= psychology).

The 5 axioms:
1. One cannot not communicate.
a. Thus, the problem is not ‘to communicate or not to communicate’ but ‘to
communicate effectively or not to communicate effectively’.
2. Every communication has a content and a relationship aspect such that the latter
classifies the former and is therefore a metacommunication.
3. The nature of a relationship is contingent upon the punctuation of the
communicational sequences between the communicants.
4. Human beings communicate both digitally and analogically.
5. All communicational interchanges are either symmetrical or complementary,
depending on whether they are based on equality or difference.
In easier way:
1. We cannot not communicate.
2. Content and relationship level.
3. Punctuation.
4. Digital and analogic.
5. Symmetrical or complementary.

1.3 Mindset
2 different mindsets:
1. Fixed mindset (entity theory): intelligence (or ability) is a fixed trait.
a. Fixed mindset students adopt performance goals -> looking smart is most
important.
b. Fixed mindset students say that effort is negative, it should come naturally.
2. Growth mindset (incremental theory): intelligence is a malleable quality, a potential
that can be developed.
a. Growth mindset students adopt learning goals -> learning is most important.
b. Growth mindset students say that effort is positive, work hard, effort is key.
What mindsets do
Strategies when anticipating failure:
- Fixed mindset:

, o Self-handicapping: external explanation for your failure.
o Feedback avoidance: you don’t want to know how you did.
- Growth mindset: assume they have ‘not yet’ mastered the relevant skill and keep
going.

Strategies after failure:
- Fixed mindset students:
o Helplessness: believe that you are unable to control or change the situation,
so they do not try, even when opportunities for change are available.
o Self-serving bias: tendency to attribute our successes to internal, personal
factors and our failures to external, situational factors.
o Downward comparison: comparing ourselves to those who are worse off than
us on the comparison point.
- Growth mindset students:
o Mastery-oriented: having the goal of learning and mastering the task
according to self-set standards (focused on developing new skills, improving
and acquiring knowledge).
o Upward comparison: compare ourselves to someone who is (perceived to be
performing) better than we are.

Zone of proximal development view of mindsets




Study #1 on students making a transition to 7th grade
- Students with a growth mindset improve in their math grade.
- Student with a fixed mindset stay on the same level.

Study on how mindsets are communicated
Each student worked on a non-verbal IQ test & was given one kind of praise.
There were 3 different groups:
1. Intelligence praise: ‘wow, that’s a really good score, you must be smart at this.’
2. Effort praise: ‘wow, that’s a really good score, you must have tried really hard.’
3. Control group: ‘wow, that’s a really good score.’

, Results:
- When praised intelligent, children
select performance goals over
learning goals.
- When praised with effort, children
select learning goals over
performance goals.

Other results:
- On trial 1 (before failure) all 3 groups (effort praise, control and intelligence praise)
perform equally well.
- On trial 3 (after failure) the effort praise group performs a lot better on the
intelligence test than the intelligence praise group.
Also:
- Children who were effort praised wanted to know strategy information.
- While children who were intelligence praised wanted to know performance
information (how good they did relatively to others).
Also:
- Children who were intelligence praised lied more about their scores (being smarter /
better than children in effort praise and control group -> these 2 groups scored equal)

Study #2 on students making a transition to 7th grade
Results:
- The growth mindset group math grades go up after the intervention.
- The math grades of the control group go down a little bit after intervention.
Also:
- In the growth mindset grouped more people increased their motivation compared to
the control group.

A study of mindset and management decisions
- When having a growth mindset, perceived self-efficacy stays high, while with a stable
identity belief this perceived self-efficacy goes down.
- With a growth mindset, people set goals for themselves, while entity mindset
individuals did less.
- Efficient use of analytic
strategies kept growing
with a growth mindset,
while with fixed mindset
went down.
- Organizational productivity
stayed high with people
who think skills are
acquirable (growth
mindset), while it went
down with people with
fixed mindset.
Web lectures week 2

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
October 16, 2024
Number of pages
29
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Tom frijns
Contains
All classes

Subjects

$9.96
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
amberkorte Universiteit van Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
15
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
9
Last sold
2 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions