100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

A level Edexcel economics a paper 1 examiner report 2023

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
72
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
30-08-2024
Written in
2024/2025

A level Edexcel economics a paper 1 examiner report 2023 A level Edexcel economics a paper 1 examiner report 2023 A level Edexcel economics a paper 1 examiner report 2023 A level Edexcel economics a paper 1 examiner report 2023 A level Edexcel economics a paper 1 examiner report 2023 A level Edexcel economics a paper 1 examiner report 2023 A level Edexcel economics a paper 1 examiner report 2023

Show more Read less
Institution
A Level Edexcel Economics A Paper 1
Course
A Level Edexcel Economics A Paper 1











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
A Level Edexcel Economics A Paper 1
Course
A Level Edexcel Economics A Paper 1

Document information

Uploaded on
August 30, 2024
Number of pages
72
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

Examiners’
nReportJune 2023
n n




GCE nEconomics nA n9EC0 n01

,Edexcel nand nBTEC nQualifications

Edexcel nand nBTEC nqualifications ncome nfrom nPearson, nthe nUK's nlargest nawarding
nbody. nWe nprovide na nwide nrange nof nqualifications nincluding nacademic, nvocational,

noccupational nand nspecific n programmes n for n employers. n For n further n information n visit

n our n qualifications n websitesnat nwww.edexcel.com nor nwww.btec.co.uk.


Alternatively, nyou ncan nget nin ntouch nwith nus nusing nthe ndetails non nour ncontact
nus npage natnwww.edexcel.com/contactus.




Giving nyou ninsight nto ninform nnext nsteps

ResultsPlus nis nPearson's nfree nonline nservice ngiving ninstant nand ndetailed nanalysis
nof nyournstudents' nexam nresults.


See nstudents' nscores nfor nevery nexam nquestion.
Understand nhow nyour nstudents' nperformance ncompares nwith nclass nand nnational
naverages. nIdentify npotential ntopics, nskills nand ntypes nof nquestion nwhere nstudents

nmay nneed nto ndevelop ntheir nlearning nfurther.


For nmore ninformation non nResultsPlus, nor nto nlog nin, nvisit
nwww.edexcel.com/resultsplus. nYour nexams nofficer nwill nbe nable nto nset nup nyour

nResultsPlus naccount nin nminutes nvia nEdexcel nOnline.


Pearson: n helping n people n progress, n everywhere

Pearson naspires nto nbe nthe nworld’s nleading nlearning ncompany. nOur naim nis nto nhelp
neveryone nprogress nin ntheir nlives nthrough neducation. nWe nbelieve nin nevery nkind nof

nlearning, nfor nall nkinds nofnpeople, nwherever nthey nare nin nthe nworld. nWe’ve nbeen

ninvolved nin neducation nfor nover n150 nyears,nand nby nworking nacross n70 ncountries, nin n100

nlanguages, nwe nhave nbuilt nan ninternational nreputation n for n our n commitment n to n high

n standards n and n raising n achievement n through ninnovation nin neducation. nFind nout nmore

nabout nhow nwe ncan nhelp n you nand nyour nstudents nat: nwww.pearson.com/uk.


June n2023

Publications n Code n 9EC0_01_2306_ER

All nthe n material nin n this n publication nis ncopyright

© nPearson nEducation nLtd n2023




GCE nEconomics nA n9EC0 n01
n2

, Introduction

This nwas nthe nseventh n9EC0_01 nexamination nin nthe n2015 nSpecification nseries. nIt
nproved nonce nagain nto nbe nan naccessible, nwide nranging npaper nthat nfacilitated n a nhigh

ndegree nof ndifferentiationnbetween ncandidates. nThe nquestions nwritten ncovered na nbroad

nrange nof nmicroeconomic nissuesnfrom nThemes n1 nand n3. nIt nwas nclear nthat ncandidates

nhad nprepared nwell nusing nthe npast npapers navailable nonline. nMany ncandidates nalso

ndemonstrated nclear nevidence nof ntopical nexamples nto nsupport ntheir n answers n to nthe

nlonger n questions. nCandidates nwere n also nable nto n respond nwell ntonthe ncommand nwords

nused nin nthe nquestions nand ndemonstrated neffective nuse nof ndata.


In nSection nA, nthe nmajority nof ncandidates nanswered nthe nmultiple nchoice nquestions
ncorrectly, nalthough n4(c) nproved na nchallenge nfor nsome. nIn nthis nexample nC nwas nthe

nonly ncorrect nanswer nbecause nthe narea nEKPe nwas nthe noriginal nproducer nsurplus nand

nthe nimposed nminimum nprice nwould nincrease nproducer nsurplus nto nby nGEPeP1. nThe

naddition nof nguaranteed nminimum nprice nto nthe nquestion n may nhave nhelped.

nConsideration nof nthe ndifficulty n of nthis n question nhas nbeen ntaken ninto nconsideration

nwhen nsetting nthe ngrade nboundaries nfor nthis npaper. nSection nA ncontinues nto nhighlight

nthe nrequirement nfor ncandidates nto nbe nconfident nin ntheir nuse nof nquantitative nskills.

nQuestions n2(a), n4(a), nand n5(a) nwere nvery nsignificant nin nthis nregard. nQuestionn2(a)

n asked n candidates n to n work n out n the n opportunity n cost n of n a n movement n from n point n X

n to n pointnY, nso nit nwas nclearly nasking nfor nthe nreduction nin nthe nnumber nof noats.

nCandidates noften njust ncalculated na nratio nof n2:4 nor n1:6. nIn nquestion n1(a) nthere nwere

nno nmarks nfor na ndefinition nbecausencandidates nwere nasked nfor nan nadvantage nof na nfree

nmarket neconomy. nWhen nasked nto ndraw na ndiagram, nmany ncandidates ndid nthis

nsuccessfully nfor n3(b) nbut nthere nwere nmany nerrors ndrawing nthe nshort nrun nprofit

nmaximising nequilibrium nof na nloss-making nfirm nin nmonopolistic ncompetition.

nCandidates nshould nensure nthey npractise nthe nfull nrange nof ndiagrams nin nthe

nspecification nbecause nquestions ncould nask ndirectly nfor na ndiagram, nas nwas nagain nthe

ncase nwithnthe nprice ndiscrimination nquestion, n6(e).




3 n GCE nEconomics nA n9EC0
n01

, Section nB nresponses nare nnow ndemonstrating nclear nevidence nof nthe nrecognition nto ngo
nbeyond nbasic nanalysis. nIn n6(a) nmany ncandidate neither nidentified nthe nmarket nfor nonline

nstreaming nservices nas nan noligopoly nor nlegal nmonopoly. nHowever, nmany neither

ncalculated nthe nconcentration nratio nincorrectly nor ndidn't nuse nthe ndata nto nsupport

ntheir nanswers. n6(b) nwas ngenerally nwell nanswered, nand ncandidates nhave nbecome

nmuch nmore nfamiliar nwith nthe nreasons nfor n irrational n behaviour. n There n are n three

n different n types n on n the n specification, n and n candidates nwere noften nconfident nof nhow nthey

nlinked nto nthe n situation nof nNetflix nsubscribers. n6(c), nwhich ntested nthe npractical

napplication nof nthe nconcept nof ncross nelasticity nof ndemand, nwas nwell nanswered.

nHowever, nsome ncandidates nconfused ncross nelasticity nof ndemand nwith nprice nelasticity

nor nincome nelasticity nof ndemand, nor nwrote nthe nformula nout nincorrectly. n6(d), nwhich

ntested nthe nprivate nand nexternal nbenefits nof nviewing neducational nwebsites nand nTV

nprogrammes,nrequired na nclear nassessment nof nthe nimpact nof neach. nMany ncandidates

nwere nable nto ndemonstrate n the n third n party, n for n example, n as n the n firm n gaining

n productivity n benefits n from n morenhighly nskilled nworkers. nThough na ndiagram nwas nnot

nasked nfor nin nthe nquestion, nthis nwas nan nexcellent nexample nof nwhere none nwould nhelp

nto ndevelop nthe nanalysis. nQuestion n6(e), nas nwe nmentioned nbefore, ndid nask nfor na

ndiagram nand nthe nsimple n2 nsub-market ndiagram nwas nquite nadequate, n though n many

n candidates n offered n a n whole n market n diagram n as n well. n It n is n important nto nnote nthat

nmany ncandidates nconfused nproduct ndifferentiation nwith nprice ndiscrimination.


For nSection nC, nwhere nthe ncandidates nhave na nchoice nof nwhich nquestion nto nanswer, njust
nover nhalfnwent nfor nquestion n8. nThis nquestion nexplored npolicies nto ndeal nwith ncarbon

nemissions ncaused nbynroad ntransport, nso nthose ncandidates nwho nused nemissions ntrading

nschemes nhad nto nbe ncareful nto nlink nthe npolicy nto nroad ntransport. nQuestion n7, nwhich

ntested nmethods nof n government nintervention nthat ncould nbe nused nto ncontrol nhousehold

nenergy nbills nin nthe n UK nwas n very ntopical, nand ncandidates ndemonstrated nin ndepth

nunderstanding. nQuestion n8 nwas nsimilarly nwell nanswered, nand nagain nthe ntopicality

nmade nfor ninteresting nreading. nThere nis nnow nclear nevidence nin nsection nC nof

ncandidates nfocusing nin non ntwo nto nthree nwell ndeveloped npoints. nTo nscore nfull nmarks na

njustified njudgement nis, nas never, nrequired nto nachieve nthis.




GCE nEconomics nA n9EC0 n01
n4

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Prose1 Strayer University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
620
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
70
Documents
6501
Last sold
1 day ago
REALITIEXAM

I know how frustrating it can get with all those assignments mate. Nursing Being my main profession line, i have essential guides that are A graded, I am a very friendly person so don

4.5

298 reviews

5
228
4
24
3
20
2
8
1
18

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions