ISTQB Foundation - Chapter 3 - Static
Testing
Two foremost static trying out techniques - ANS1) Reviews
2) Static analysis
Reviews - ANSSystematic examination of a file by way of considered one of greater people with
the main intention of finding and eliminating mistakes
Types of defects discovered in reviews - ANS1) Deviations from standards
2) Requirements defects
three) Design defects
four) Insufficient maintainability
five) Incorrect interface specifications
Basic evaluation system - ANS1) Document under overview is studied
2) Reviewers become aware of problems and tell the writer
3) Author comes to a decision on movement to take and updates as wanted
Formal evaluation process - ANS1) Planning (choose personnel, allocate roles, defining entry
and exit standards, choosing parts of report to review)
2) Kick-off
three) Review access standards
4) Individual instruction
five) Noting incidents
6) Review assembly
7) Examine
eight) Rework
nine) Fixing defects
10) Follow-up
11) Checking exit standards
Review roles - ANS1) Manager - makes a decision on what to review
2) Moderator - leads the evaluation
three) Author - character who wrote the document
four) Reviewers - plays the review of files
five) Scribe - documents the assessment
Four sorts of critiques - ANS1) Informal
2) Walkthrough
Testing
Two foremost static trying out techniques - ANS1) Reviews
2) Static analysis
Reviews - ANSSystematic examination of a file by way of considered one of greater people with
the main intention of finding and eliminating mistakes
Types of defects discovered in reviews - ANS1) Deviations from standards
2) Requirements defects
three) Design defects
four) Insufficient maintainability
five) Incorrect interface specifications
Basic evaluation system - ANS1) Document under overview is studied
2) Reviewers become aware of problems and tell the writer
3) Author comes to a decision on movement to take and updates as wanted
Formal evaluation process - ANS1) Planning (choose personnel, allocate roles, defining entry
and exit standards, choosing parts of report to review)
2) Kick-off
three) Review access standards
4) Individual instruction
five) Noting incidents
6) Review assembly
7) Examine
eight) Rework
nine) Fixing defects
10) Follow-up
11) Checking exit standards
Review roles - ANS1) Manager - makes a decision on what to review
2) Moderator - leads the evaluation
three) Author - character who wrote the document
four) Reviewers - plays the review of files
five) Scribe - documents the assessment
Four sorts of critiques - ANS1) Informal
2) Walkthrough
