100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Case uitwerking

Taak 5

Beoordeling
3.0
(3)
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
13
Geüpload op
06-11-2019
Geschreven in
2018/2019

case 5 - choosing strategies for change

Instelling
Vak









Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
6 november 2019
Aantal pagina's
13
Geschreven in
2018/2019
Type
Case uitwerking
Docent(en)
Onbekend
Cijfer
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Case 5 course 6 learning year 2 GW (BMEZ)
Name: Esmée Cox
Student number: i6160834
Date: 24 June 2019

Learning goals:
1. What different strategies for change in health care are there?
Grol, R., Wensing, M., Eccles, M., & Davis, D. (2013). Improving patient care: The
implementation of change in health care. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
The literature provides a wide variety of methods, strategies and measures to introduce
improvements from which to choose when planning or introducing changes to work
processes, guidelines or best practices. Also, there are different ways to categorize these
methods. Strategies are based on barriers to change.
1) Taxonomy of strategies for change (EPOC):
a. Professional interventions:
o Distribution of educational materials → distribution of published or
printed recommendations for clinical care, including clinical practice
guidelines, audiovisual materials and electronic publications.
o Educational meetings → conferences, lectures, workshops or
traineeships.
o Local consensus processes → inclusion of participating providers in
discussion to ensure that they agree that the chosen clinical problem
was important and the approach to managing the problem was
appropriate.
o Educational outreach visits → use of a trained person to meet with
providers in their practice settings to give information with the
intent of changing the provider’s practice. The information given
may include feedback on the performance of the providers.
o Local opinion leaders → use of providers nominated and explicitly
identified by their colleagues as “educationally influential”.
o Patient-mediated interventions → new, previously unavailable
clinical information collected directly from patients and given to the
provider, e.g. patient depression scores from a survey instrument.
o Audit and feedback → any summary of clinical performance of
healthcare over a specified period of time from medical records,
computerized databases or observations from patients. The
following interventions are excluded from audit and feedback:
 Provision of new clinical information not directly reflecting
provider performance collected from patients, e.g. scores on a
depression instrument, abnormal test results; these
interventions are better described as patient mediated.
 Feedback of individual patients’ health record information in
an alternate format (e.g., computerized); these interventions
are described as organizational.
o Reminders → patient- or encounter-specific information designed to
prompt a health professional to perform or avoid a clinical action,
based on information provided verbally, on paper, by computer, in

Pagina 1 van 13

, the medical records, or through interactions with peers. Computer-
aided decision support and drug dosage are included.
o Marketing → use of personal interviewing, group discussion such as
focus groups, or a survey of targeted providers to identify barriers to
change and subsequent design of an intervention that addresses
identified barriers.
o Mass media → varied use of communication strategies that reach
great numbers of individuals including television, radio, newspapers,
posters, leaflets and booklets, alone or in conjunction with other
interventions; targeted at the population level.
b. Financial interventions
o Provider interventions
 Fee-for-service → providers is paid for number and type of
service delivered.
 Prepaid services or contractual relationships.
 Capitation → provider is paid a set amount per patient for
providing specific care.
 Provider salaried service → provider receives basic salary or
providing specific care.
 Prospective payment → provider is paid a fixed amount for
healthcare in advance.
 Provider incentives → provider receives direct or indirect
financial reward or benefit for undertaking a specific action.
 Institution incentives → institution or group of providers
receives direct or indirect financial rewards or benefits for
doing specific action.
 Provider grant/allowance → provider receives direct or indirect
financial reward or benefit not tied to specific action.
 Institution grant/allowance → institution or group of providers
receives direct or indirect financial reward or benefit not tied
to specific action.
 Provider penalty → provider receives direct or indirect financial
penalty for behavior not aligned with clinical or improvement
goals.
 Institution penalty → institution or group of providers receives
direct or indirect financial penalty for inappropriate behavior.
 Formulary → items such as a specific drug or investigations are
added or removed from a list of reimbursable items.
 Other
o Patient interventions
 Premium → patient payment for health insurance, this includes
different types of insurance plans, including those paid fully or
partly by employers.
 Co-payment → patient payment at the time of healthcare
delivery in addition to health insurance coverage; for example,
while many insurance plans cover prescription medications,


Pagina 2 van 13
$4.25
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:
Gekocht door 0 studenten

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 3 reviews worden weergegeven
5 jaar geleden

5 jaar geleden

5 jaar geleden

3.0

3 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
3
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
esmeecox Maastricht University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
57
Lid sinds
7 jaar
Aantal volgers
37
Documenten
38
Laatst verkocht
4 maanden geleden

3.4

34 beoordelingen

5
5
4
7
3
19
2
1
1
2

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen