100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

HPI4002 All cases Innovation and quality management (2019/2010)

Rating
4.5
(2)
Sold
13
Pages
144
Uploaded on
26-10-2019
Written in
2019/2020

Year:

Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
October 26, 2019
Number of pages
144
Written in
2019/2020
Type
Other
Person
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

Tutorials Innovation and Quality Management
HPI 4002

, Case 1: “We need to innovate!”
Problem statement: why are innovations (not) needed in healthcare?

Literature: book Barlow (2017): chapter 1 (mainly focus 1-9, but good to read the whole chapter),
chapter 2 & 6 (sections see Reference list), chapter 3 (box 3.1 as a starting point)

Learning goals:
1) Learning goal 1: Definition of innovation

What is innovation?
Many different definitions of innovation exist.
Key points in these definitions are:
• New ideas (invention)
➔ A new (or improved) product, process or service, or a whole new business or business model
• Exploitation
➔ The idea must be implementable and potentially value generating (i.e. innovation = invention
+ exploitation)
• Successful
➔ The innovation is adopted by the target audience
• New (scope)
➔ This is a relative term; it can mean ‘new to the world’, ‘new to the market’, or ‘new to the
organisation’

What is innovation (according to Barlow)
According to Barlow (2017):
• Innovation can refer to an outcome and it can refer to the process by which these outcomes are
developed
• Innovation has both a creative dimension (invention) and a commercial or practical dimension that
involves the exploitation of the invention.
➔ Only when both of these dimensions are managed does one have an innovation (many ideas
fail to make it beyond the invention stage).

Source: Lecture 3

2) Learning goal 2: What are the subgroups of innovations?

Different ways to classify innovations:
Barlow (2017) classifies innovations according to:
• Their scope:
− the degree of newness as perceived by the adopter:
o new to the world
o new to the market
o new to the organisation
o new to the individual adopter
E.g. a drug might be an innovation in one health system, but not in another

, ➔ Cooper: since the 1990s improvements and modifications of existing products
(incremental innovations) have grown substantially at the expense of innovations those are
new to the world and new to the market.

➔ Freel and de Jong: categorise innovations according to the novelty of innovation outcomes
and the extent to which innovation activities mean an organisation or company has to
acquire new capabilities (expertise equipment or knowledge)

• The form or application
− Products
Tangible (tastbaar) physical objects that are acquired and used by consumers (e.g.
an insulin pump)
− Services
intangible things where the consumer benefits from the service, but
does not actually acquire an object (e.g. a consult by a diabetes nurse)
− Processes
equipment, methods, systems used by producers of products and
services (e.g. the production process of an insuline pump, or logistic
processes within a hospital such as the registration system for patients)

• Their innovativeness
the amount of change compared to the current norm
o The amount of R&D (research and development), design or engineering effort that
has gone into its
creation
o The extent to which the innovation affects performance

Barlow (2017) discusses the model of Henderson and Clark (1990):
̶ Based on the innovativeness four types of innovations can be distinguished:
o Incremental
o Modular
o Architectural

, o Radical (= discontinuous)




➔ = Henderson and Clark: type of innovation

Two dimensions can be distinguished with regard to these four types of
innovations:
o Impact of the innovation on the components of a product, service or
process (so the extent to which the components are changed)
o Impact on the linkages between these components (so the extent to
which the underlying system is changed)




➔ Combination between Cooper’s model and the Henderson and Clark model

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
3 year ago

5 year ago

4.5

2 reviews

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Renate101 Maastricht University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
133
Member since
10 year
Number of followers
91
Documents
0
Last sold
1 year ago

3.1

14 reviews

5
2
4
3
3
4
2
4
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions