100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

IOS2601 Assignment 2 QUIZ (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 (777791)- DUE 23 August 2024

Rating
1.0
(2)
Sold
7
Pages
21
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
09-08-2024
Written in
2024/2025

Exam study book Statutory Interpretation of Christo J. Botha - ISBN: 9780702199530 (Guaranteed success)

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
August 9, 2024
Number of pages
21
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

IOS2601 Assignment

2 QUIZ (COMPLETE

ANSWERS)

Semester 2 2024

(777791)- DUE 23

August 2024

, IOS2601 Assignment 2 QUIZ (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024

(777791)- DUE 23 August 2024

Question 1 Complete Mark 2.00 out of 2.00 Question 2 Complete Mark 2.00

out of 2.00 QUIZ Botha is of the opinion that the interpretation process begins

with the reading of the legislation concerned. In which case didthe court

decide that ordinary meaning must be attached to the words? A. Union

Government v Tonkin 1918 AD 533 B. Union Government v Mack 1917 AD

731 C. Principal Immigration Offi cer v Hawabu 1936 AD 26 D. Principal

Immigration Offi cer v Purshotam 1928 AD 435 Delegated legislation can be

invalidated by court if it does not comply with the requirement concerning

vagueness provided byadministrative law. In which case did the court lay

down a number of guidelines for determining vagueness in the legislation? A.

MEC for Public Works, Road and Transport, Free State v Morning Star

Minibus Hiring Services 2003 (4) SA 429 (O) B. Matatiele Municipality v

President of the RSA 2006 (5) SA 47 (CC) C. Engelbrecht v Road Accident

Fund 2007 96) SA 96 (CC) D. Sappi Fine Papers (Pty) Ltd v ICI Canada Inc

1992 (3) SA 306 (A) Grade 50.00 100%) Question 3 Complete Mark 2.00 out

of 2.00 Question 4 Complete Mark 2.00 out of 2.00 Question 5 Complete Mark

0.00 out of 2.00 In _________the court reiterated that the meaning of a word

cannot be determined conclusively by its dictionary meaning. A. Santam

Insurance Ltd v Taylor 1985 (1) SA 514 (A) B. De Beers Industrial Diamond


For assistance whatsapp +254702715801

, Division (Pty) Ltd v Ishizuka 1980 (2) SA 191 (T) C. Ex parte the Minister of

Justice: In re R v Jacobson and Levy 1931 AD 466 D. S v Makhubela 1981 4

SA 210 (B) In ____________ the court stated clearly that the principle that a

meaning should be assigned to every word is not absolute. A. Secretary for

Inland Revenue v Somers Vine 1968 (2) SA 138 (A) B. Finbro Furnishers (Pty)

Ltd v Registrar of Deeds, Bloemfontein 1985 (4) SA 773 C. Golden China TV

Game Centre v Nintendo Co Ltd 1997 (1) SA 405 (A) D. Volschenk v

Volschenk 1946 TPD 486 In Bato Star Fishing (Pty) Ltd v Minister of

Environmental Affairs 2004 (4) SA 490 (CC) Ngcobo J remarked that? A. The

starting point towards interpreting any piece of legislation is in the text. B. The

starting point towards interpreting any piece of legislation is in the

Constitution. C. The discretion lies with the judicial offi cer(s) to ascribe

whatever meaning they want to any piece of legislation. D. The starting point

towards interpreting any piece of legislation is in its table of contents.

Question 6 Complete Mark 2.00 out of 2.00 Question 7 Complete Mark 2.00

out of 2.00 Question 8 Complete Mark 2.00 out of 2.00 In Bezuidenhout v

Mutual Insurance Ltd 1987 (1) SA 703 (A) the court held the following: A. If the

provision is formulated in fl exible or vague terms, it is an indication that it is

directory. B. Words in a negative form indicate a peremptory connotation. C. A

word or words with an imperative or affi rmative character indicate a

peremptory provision. D. The word shall is a strong indication that the


For assistance whatsapp +254702715801

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
1 year ago

Very confusing

1 year ago

Can I get a refund on this one? Complete nonsense. It's just all the things thrown in there without structure or answers. Waste of money on this one

1.0

2 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
2
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
edwardsokengo Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
86
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
74
Documents
71
Last sold
2 months ago

3.5

17 reviews

5
6
4
5
3
2
2
0
1
4

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions