JD Next Exam Prep
Review Questions and
Answers 100% Pass |
Guaranteed Success
David Mungai [Date] [Course title]
, JD Next Exam Prep Review
Questions and Answers 100% Pass |
Guaranteed Success
Consideration in contract law; Forbearance as sufficient
consideration. - Answer>> Hamer v. Sidway - Key Concept
Objective Theory of Contracts; Contract enforceability based on
outward expressions. - Answer>> Lucy v. Zehmer - Key
Concept
Breach of Warranty; Concept of expectation damages in medical
cases. - Answer>> Hawkins v. McGee - Key Concept
Adequacy of consideration; Legal enforceability despite
disproportionate consideration. - Answer>> Batsakis v.
Demotsis - Key Concept
Distinction between legally binding promises and gratuitous
promises; Role of consideration. - Answer>> Kirksey v. Kirksey
- Key Concept
Ambiguity in contract terms; Importance of consensus ad idem. -
Answer>> Raffles v. Wichelhaus - Key Concept
Implied terms in contracts; Duty to perform for business efficacy. -
Answer>> Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon - Key Concept
A promise that lacks commitment and does not create a legal
obligation due to the lack of mutuality. - Answer>> Illusory
Promise - Definition
Review Questions and
Answers 100% Pass |
Guaranteed Success
David Mungai [Date] [Course title]
, JD Next Exam Prep Review
Questions and Answers 100% Pass |
Guaranteed Success
Consideration in contract law; Forbearance as sufficient
consideration. - Answer>> Hamer v. Sidway - Key Concept
Objective Theory of Contracts; Contract enforceability based on
outward expressions. - Answer>> Lucy v. Zehmer - Key
Concept
Breach of Warranty; Concept of expectation damages in medical
cases. - Answer>> Hawkins v. McGee - Key Concept
Adequacy of consideration; Legal enforceability despite
disproportionate consideration. - Answer>> Batsakis v.
Demotsis - Key Concept
Distinction between legally binding promises and gratuitous
promises; Role of consideration. - Answer>> Kirksey v. Kirksey
- Key Concept
Ambiguity in contract terms; Importance of consensus ad idem. -
Answer>> Raffles v. Wichelhaus - Key Concept
Implied terms in contracts; Duty to perform for business efficacy. -
Answer>> Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon - Key Concept
A promise that lacks commitment and does not create a legal
obligation due to the lack of mutuality. - Answer>> Illusory
Promise - Definition