Philosophy 110: Logic Exam (Creighton University) Latest Questions With Passed Solutions!!Exam Questions And Answers Rated A+ New Update Assured Satisfaction
Argument - giving reasons for a certain kind of conclusion (Exchange of opposing views) Premise - what reasons you're giving conclusion - what you're trying to establish with a premise Standard argument form - 1. premise 2. premise c. conclusion deductive argument - any argument in which the premises is related to the conclusion so that the premises are supposed to guarantee the truth of the conclusion conditional statement - statement made up of an antecedent and a consequent antecedent - the p or first part of the premise consequent - the q or the second part of the premise necessary condition - the absence of the consequent guarantees the absence of the antecedent sufficient condition - the presence of the antecedent guarantees the conclusion to be true and present deductive validity - the argument works out well and can be supporteddeductive invalidity - the argument doesn't work out well and can't be supported fallacy - a mistaken belief based on an unsound argument deductive soundness - the argument is VALID and all the premises are TRUE conjunct - p or q of statements conjunction - the p & q statements put together to make two TRUE statements When are conjunctions true? - -When both the conjuncts are true
Written for
- Institution
- Philosophy 110: Logic
- Course
- Philosophy 110: Logic
Document information
- Uploaded on
- May 21, 2024
- Number of pages
- 4
- Written in
- 2023/2024
- Type
- Exam (elaborations)
- Contains
- Questions & answers
Subjects
-
philosophy 110 logic creighton university
Also available in package deal