Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Directors Service Contracts - Approval Procedure

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
4
Uploaded on
25-03-2019
Written in
2018/2019

Easy to use in exam procedure for approval of directors service contract, including over and under 2 years, with and without shareholder approval and written resolution requirements. Includes relevant legislation and administration required.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

Directors Service Contracts
Ch 6.8, pg.124

Under 2 Years – Board Approval Procedure
Art 3 and art 19 (Table A art 84) – permits board of D to enter into service contract with
director on behalf of the company.
Board will decide terms, director’s responsibilities and authorities, and salary.

BM
Calling: Any director, or they can authorise secretary if there is one (art 9).
WR: any D, permitted art8(2)
Notice: To each director before meeting (art 9(1) & (3)) wherever he is in the world – can be waived
(art 9(4).
Reasonable in circumstances (Re Homer).
Need not be in writing, may be oral (art 9(3) & La Trinidad).
Proposed date, time, place and method of communication (art 9(2)) skype, texting allowed provided
Ds can communicate information and opinions (art10(1)).
No need to specify business of meeting (La Companie) – good practice to include draft loan
agreement.
WR: all eligible directors (art8).
Declarations: D has interest in contract however s177(6)(c) exception applies - declaration not
required for service contracts.
May not be able to vote or form quorum if conflict of interest (art 14)** (consider exceptions)
Disapplying art 14 temporarily using art 14(3) by OR – allows director to count in quorum (as cannot
reduce quorum to 1 art 11) – alternative to amending articles permanently by SR (s21) (allows abuse
by Ds).
WR: Ds that would not be eligible at BR do not vote (art 8(3)).
Quorum: Two (art 11), interested director can still attend but does not vote (Haynes v Bristol Plant
Hire).
WR = same as GM art 8(4)
Resolve to: 1. Approve contract. 2. Enter into contract. 3. Elect director deal with required admin.
Voting: Simple majority, over 50% (art 7).
One vote per director (art 7).
Communicated in all sorts of ways (art 10) – usually show of hands or oral assent ‘yes’/descent ‘no’.
If deadlock, negative prevails (art 7(1)) – unless there is chairman appointed (art 12) who has casting
vote (art13(1)) they also have control of agenda (art12(1) – unless they are the one excluded
(art13(2)).
WR: unanimous (art 8). Ds sign and return to C – R passed when required consents received.
Admin: s228 copies of all director’s service contracts (including those under two years not
requiring SH approval) must be kept available at R/O (s229) or SAIL (s1136) for inspection by
shareholders for duration and one year after terminated. Failure to comply = criminal
offence punishable by fine. s229(2) SH can request copy.
Written records must be kept for all decisions for 10 years from date of R passed (art 15).
Minutes recorded and kept at R/O or SAIL for 10 years – or offence by every officer of C in default
(s248) – must be hard copy or reproducible as hard copy (s1135(1)) – open to inspection by Ds
(Petronius Clothing Co), but no SHs (Mariqita and New Orenlada Mining Co.) – only visible by SH
agreement or litigation e.g. s994unfair prejudice petition.
WR: no requirement to records minutes as s248 does not apply (but good practice).
Keep written record for 10 years (art 15).

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
March 25, 2019
Number of pages
4
Written in
2018/2019
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Only questions

Subjects

$5.47
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
msellex University of Law
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
27
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
21
Documents
26
Last sold
5 months ago

5.0

2 reviews

5
2
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions