100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

EPPP ETHICS EXAM QUESTIONS WITH COMPLETE ANSWERS

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
18
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
07-04-2024
Written in
2023/2024

EPPP ETHICS EXAM QUESTIONS WITH COMPLETE ANSWERS A avoid making a recommendation and, instead, leave the final decision to the court. B make a recommendation only if the assessment has involved procedures that have been validated for this purpose. C make a recommendation only if he/she was not retained by one of the parents but was retained by the court. D make a recommendation only if it is based on adequate psychological data and consideration of the best interests of the child. - Answer-d. CORRECT This is the closest to the provisions of APA's Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Family Law Proceedings. There are no prohibitions against making recommendations in custody situations. However, a psychologist must always be very careful about recommendations that may have an important impact on the lives of others. Dr. R. B. Traight obtains the permission from a child's mother and father before beginning an evaluation that will be used by the court to help determine custody rights. Before the evaluation is completed, however, the mother withdraws her consent. Dr. Traight should: A make a custody recommendation on the basis of the information he has already obtained. B continue the evaluation since the father has not withdrawn his consent. C continue the evaluation since both parents gave their consent prior to beginning the evaluation. D contact the court to determine the appropriate course of action. - Answer-d. CORRECT Given the limited information provided in this question, this is the best response of those given. Whenever one parent does not give consent (or withdraws his/her consent) for an evaluation in a custody case, the psychologist should seek guidance from the court on how to proceed. DON'T evaluate with both parents consent! Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976) established:

Show more Read less
Institution
EPPP
Module
EPPP










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
EPPP
Module
EPPP

Document information

Uploaded on
April 7, 2024
Number of pages
18
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

  • the buckley amendment

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
biggdreamer Havard School
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
247
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
68
Documents
17943
Last sold
3 days ago

4.0

38 reviews

5
22
4
4
3
6
2
2
1
4

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions