100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Data Science Methods EOR

Rating
-
Sold
3
Pages
85
Uploaded on
02-04-2024
Written in
2023/2024

Summary of the DSM course, taught in the EOR master at Tilburg University.

Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
April 2, 2024
Number of pages
85
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Tilburg University

QFAS


Summary DSM

Author: Supervisor:
Rick Smeets Boldea, O

April 2, 2024

,Table of Contents
1 Small and Large Order Probabilities 4

2 Unsupervised learning 4
2.1 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1.1 Finding Principal Components (dimensions) . . . . . . 5
2.1.2 Example: US Arrests Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1.3 Numerical Computation PCA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.1.4 NIPALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.1.5 Screeplot PCA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3 Clustering 11
3.1 K-Means Clustering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.2 Hierarchical Clustering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.2.1 Interpreting a Dendrogram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.2.2 The Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm . . . . . . . . . 15
3.2.3 Choice of Dissimilarity Measure . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.3 Practical Issues in Clustering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

4 Supervised (statistical) Learning 17
4.1 Why Estimate f ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4.1.1 Prediction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.1.2 Inference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.2 How To Estimate f ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.2.1 Parametric Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.2.2 Non-Parametric Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.3 Assessing Model Accuracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.3.1 Measuring the Quality of Fit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.3.2 The Bias-Variance Trade-Off . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
4.4 The Classification Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.4.1 The Bayes Classifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.4.2 K-Nearest Neighbours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

5 Classification 33
5.1 Why Not Linear Regression? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
5.2 Logistic Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
5.2.1 The Logistic Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35


1

, 5.2.2 Estimating the Regression Coefficients . . . . . . . . . 36
5.2.3 Multinomial Logistic Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
5.3 Generative Models for Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
5.3.1 Linear Discriminant Analysis for p = 1 . . . . . . . . . 38
5.3.2 Linear Discriminant Analysis for p > 1 . . . . . . . . . 40
5.3.3 Quadratic Discriminant Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
5.4 A Comparison of Classification Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

6 Resampling Methods 47
6.1 Cross-Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
6.1.1 The Validation Set Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
6.1.2 Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
6.1.3 k-Fold Cross-Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
6.1.4 Bias-Variance Trade Off for k-Fold Cross-Validation . . 51
6.1.5 Cross-Validation for Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
6.2 The Bootstrap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

7 Linear Model Selection and Regularization 54
7.1 Subset Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
7.1.1 Best Subset Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
7.1.2 Stepwise Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
7.2 Choosing the Optimal Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
7.2.1 Cp , AIC, BIC and Adjusted R2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
7.2.2 Validation and Cross-Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
7.3 Shrinkage Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
7.3.1 Ridge Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
7.3.2 The Lasso . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
7.3.3 The Variable Selection Property of the Lasso . . . . . . 64
7.3.4 Comparing the Lasso and Ridge Regression . . . . . . 65
7.3.5 Selecting the Tuning Parameter λ . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
7.4 Dimension Reduction Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
7.4.1 Principal Components Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
7.4.2 Partial Least Squares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

8 Considerations in High Dimensions 70




2

, 9 Tree-Based Methods 72
9.1 The Basics of Decision Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
9.1.1 Regression Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
9.1.2 Prediction via Stratification of the Feature Space . . . 73
9.1.3 Tree Pruning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
9.2 Classification Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
9.2.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Trees . . . . . . . . . 78
9.3 Bagging, Random Forests, and Boosting . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
9.3.1 Bagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
9.3.2 Out-of-Bag Error Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
9.3.3 Variable Importance Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
9.4 Random Forests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
9.5 Boosting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

10 Double Machine Learning for Treatment and Structural Pa-
rameters 82
10.1 Partially Linear Regression - Double Machine Learning . . . . 82




3

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
rickprive611 Tilburg University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
45
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
2
Documents
9
Last sold
1 week ago
Tilburg University - EOR - Summaries

Samenvattingen gemaakt in LaTeX over vercschillende vakken gegeven in de BSc EOR en MSc op Tilburg University.

4.5

2 reviews

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions