100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Omissions revision grid

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Uploaded on
31-08-2018
Written in
2017/2018

Omissions revision grid, including all essential information.

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
August 31, 2018
Number of pages
2
Written in
2017/2018
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Omissions

Duty to act / point of law Case name / Act Case informaton
Contractual duty R v Pittood Railtay crossing guard didn’t close the gates, someone died. Guilty because he had a
duty to act through his employment.
Duty to act based on specifcs oo S170 oo the Road This secton oo the act maees it an ofence to oail to report a motor accident in thich D
an ofence – statutory duty Traffic Act 18㰭㰭 is involved.
Duty to act based on specifcs oo R v Dytham Police officer of duty did not intervene as someone tas being beaten to death, guilty.
an ofence – common lat This case displayed the common lat ofence oo misconduct in public office.
examples
Duty through a pre-existng Gibbins and Proctor Father and stepmother starved their child to death. Guilty as they had a duty to act
relatonship – parent and child. and oeed and not neglect her.
Duty through a pre-existng R v Hood Wioe oell and tas seriously injured, husband did not seee medical help untl last
relatonship – spouses. minute, she died. Guilty.
Duty based on an assumpton oo Stone and Dobinson D agreed to looe afer elderly sister. Did not clean her, she tas not eatng and they
care did not seee help. She died and D tas guilty.
Contnuing act duty Fagan v Metropolitan D reversed onto a police officer’s ooot and reoused to remove the car. When he
Police Commissioner reoused the mens rea tas oormed and the act tas held to be a contnuing act.
Thereoore there tas a coincidence oo AR and MR and he tas guilty.
Creaton oo danger duty R v Miller D oell asleep tith a lit cigarete and set fre to a matrass. Rather than seeeing help he
moved into another room. He tas guilty oo arson.
R v Evans Gave drugs to her sister, then her sister overdosed she put her to bed and did not
seee help. She tas guilty. This extended Miller idea orom ‘creaton’ oo danger to
‘contributon’ totards danger. Although V’s act tas oree, voluntary and inoormed, D
contributed by supplying drugs and oailing to call oor help.
R v Santana Bermudez Police officer searched D, aseed D io D had any sharp items in poceet, D said no. There
tas a sharp item in poceet, D guilty oo the batery ofence.
$4.13
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
malaga989 The University of Liverpool
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
28
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
10
Documents
38
Last sold
2 months ago

4.0

4 reviews

5
3
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions