100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Mrcpsych Mentor Statistics Part 1 Exam Questions & Answers 2024

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
10
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
08-02-2024
Written in
2023/2024

Mrcpsych Mentor Statistics Part 1 Exam Questions & Answers 2024 Reporting Guideline: CONSORT - ANSWER-Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Reporting Guideline: TREND - ANSWER-Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-Randomised Designs Reporting Guideline: QUORUM - ANSWER-Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses Used to examine heterogeneity in a meta-analysis often as a supplement to a forest plot - ANSWER-Galbraith Plot (aka Radial Plot) Reporting Guideline: PRISMA - ANSWER-Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Reporting Guideline: MOOSE - ANSWER-Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiological Studies Reporting Guideline: STROBE - ANSWER-Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Reporting Guideline: SQUIRE - ANSWER-Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence Reporting Guideline: STARD - ANSWER-STandards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy Reporting Guideline: MIAME - ANSWER-Minimum information about a microarray experiment Reporting Guideline: COREQ - ANSWER-Consolidated criteria for reporting Qualitative research

Show more Read less
Institution
Mrcpsych Mentor Statistics Part 1
Course
Mrcpsych Mentor Statistics Part 1









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Mrcpsych Mentor Statistics Part 1
Course
Mrcpsych Mentor Statistics Part 1

Document information

Uploaded on
February 8, 2024
Number of pages
10
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

Mrcpsych Mentor Statistics Part 1 Exam
Questions & Answers 2024

Reporting Guideline: CONSORT - ANSWER-Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials



Reporting Guideline: TREND - ANSWER-Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-Randomised
Designs



Reporting Guideline: QUORUM - ANSWER-Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses



Used to examine heterogeneity in a meta-analysis often as a supplement to a forest plot - ANSWER-
Galbraith Plot (aka Radial Plot)



Reporting Guideline: PRISMA - ANSWER-Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-
Analyses



Reporting Guideline: MOOSE - ANSWER-Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiological
Studies



Reporting Guideline: STROBE - ANSWER-Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in
Epidemiology



Reporting Guideline: SQUIRE - ANSWER-Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence



Reporting Guideline: STARD - ANSWER-STandards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy



Reporting Guideline: MIAME - ANSWER-Minimum information about a microarray experiment



Reporting Guideline: COREQ - ANSWER-Consolidated criteria for reporting Qualitative research

, Graphical representation of sample min, lower quartile, median, upper quartile and sample max -
ANSWER-Box and Whisker Plot



Used to demonstrate existence of publication bias in meta analyses - ANSWER-Funnel plot



Graphical display of continuous data where the values have been categorised - ANSWER-Histogram



Strength of evidence of constituent trials in meta analyses depicted by - ANSWER-Forest plot aka
'blobbogram'



Graphical representation using Cartesian coordinates to display values for two variables for a set of data -
ANSWER-Scatter plot



Graphical representation of survival function showing decreasing survival over time - ANSWER-Kaplan-
Meier Survival Plot



GRADE approach used for - ANSWER-Assessing the quality of evidence



Statistical test to demonstrate significant differences between the means of several groups (assuming
variables are normally distributed) - ANSWER-ANOVA



Define opportunity cost - ANSWER-The value of the next best alternative that is forgone when a choice is
made



The probability of accepting the false null hypothesis - ANSWER-Type 2 error



The probability that the false null hypothesis will be rejected - ANSWER-Power



The probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's true - ANSWER-Type one error

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Bensuda Oxford University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
834
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
445
Documents
20836
Last sold
23 hours ago
ECONOMICS,NURSING,BIOLOGY AND ALL REVISION MATERIALS

DEDICATED TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THE BEST LEARNING MATERIALS THAT WILL IMPROVE YOUR GRADES ,WELCOME TO ALIZGRADES AND LETS DO IT TOGETHER!!! GOODLUCK!!!!!!!

3.7

156 reviews

5
72
4
24
3
25
2
11
1
24

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions