EPA Lead Risk Assessor Exam Study Guide 2024 with complete solution;(Answers have been placed before each question)
2 Methods of Paint Removal Not Recommended by HUD - Dry scraping/ sanding Methylene chloride paint strippers (can cause liver and kidney damage and carbon monoxide poisoning) 2 Pros and 2 Cons of Encapsulation - Pros Lead dust is not generated May be less costly than some other abatement methods Wide range of encapsulation products is available to meet different needs Cons Inappropriate for use on friction, impact, chewable, or severely deteriorated surfaces Information on long term durability is ilmited Durability depends on the condition of previous paint layers Susceptible to water damage May not be applied in extremely hot or cold weather conditions 2 Pros and 2 cons of Off-Site Paint Removal - Pros Low reevaluation failure rate Appropriate for historical preservation Abatement contractor and owner generate minimal waste Minimal ongoing monitoring is needed (compared to interim controls) Cons Can be expensive May deteriorate glues or other elements of components which may cause components to disintegrate
Written for
- Institution
- EPA Lead Risk Assessor
- Course
- EPA Lead Risk Assessor
Document information
- Uploaded on
- January 30, 2024
- Number of pages
- 19
- Written in
- 2023/2024
- Type
- Exam (elaborations)
- Contains
- Questions & answers
Subjects
-
2 methods of paint removal not recommended by hud
-
cons inappropriate for use on friction impact ch
-
2 pros and 2 cons of off site paint removal pros
-
cons can be expensive may deteriorate glues or oth
Also available in package deal