100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Political Economy full summary

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
78
Uploaded on
08-01-2024
Written in
2023/2024

This summary contains notes from all the lectures the University of Amsterdam gave for its Political Economy course (FY) Description given by the University: The position of Political Economy (PE) within the Political Science programme is twofold. Firstly, PE is seen as the component of the discipline that studies government policy in relation to ‘the economy’, including delegated policy that is formed or implemented by supranational or international organisations such as the European Union or the World Trade Organisation. Secondly, PE can be understood as a cluster of theories about society and the political processes within it. Characteristic of these theories is that politics and economic power (having tangible and intangible assets) are inextricably linked. The politics and economic system of a society do not just influence each other; they are two sides of the same social order. The list of examples that illustrate this relationship is long. For instance, democracy and trade have often grown alongside each other while authoritarian regimes often appear to do well when exploitation of raw materials is an important source of prosperity. In democracies, it has long been believed that voting behaviour is determined by material interests, even though this appears to be changing nowadays. Lobbyists from major companies, unions and other interest groups invest significant amounts of money and time in influencing government policy to their own advantage. European integration is primarily driven by the perceived economic advantages of the European internal market. Shifts in power between the major political players on the world stage, such as China and the US, are based on changing economic positions. The climate crisis shows how economic interests both play a role in driving the climate crisis and how this crisis is tackled. In short: politics shapes the economy and the economy shapes politics. This insight plays a central role in PE: you can’t understand one without the other. Classic political thinkers generally recognised the link between economy and politics. To put it even more strongly: the idea that you could study the economy outside of a historical political framework only came into being at the end of the 19th century. Before this, neither political science nor economic science existed - Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Karl Marx were all practitioners of what they themselves called political economy. In the decades before the First World War, separate social science ‘disciplines’ evolved, such as economics, sociology and international relations. However, many figureheads of these disciplines – Weber, Carr, Veblen, Keynes and Schumpeter – clearly follow in the tradition of their classical predecessors. It may not have always been known by this name, but political economy has always existed in the 20th century. In recent decades, economists have acquired the social privilege of acting as ‘experts’ on economic matters, usually without giving the state any meaningful place in their analyses. But the 2008 credit crisis changed this. Many saw this crisis as a consequence of an overly narrow, overly technical and mechanical view of the economy, such as that used by economists for many years. Political economy as an approach is clearly returning as a way of gaining an overarching view of society, politics and economics. There are three separate elements to this course: (1) the history of modern capitalism as the dominant (but not the only) organisational form of economic activity, (2) the history of politico-economic ideas, often driven by these ‘real-world’ developments and (3) topics from current events which illustrate how old ideas are still relevant in today’s world. Students can examine the subject matter of the lectures and the literature in greater detail in the tutorial groups. When doing so, it is essential that students themselves can work on the material based on practical examples or in small groups to gain a greater understanding and to establish their own point of view on important politico-economic debates

Show more Read less
Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
January 8, 2024
Number of pages
78
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Political economy full notes

Lecture 1:

Political science:
● Scientific study of politics
● Analysis of political ideas, norms behaviors and institutions to inform publix choices
about government governance and public policy.
Economics:
● The study of scarcity, of how people use resources and respond to incentives

Classical thinkers considered the economy and politics inseparable:
● Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and John Stuart Mill called themselves political
economists
○ Adam Smith: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations
○ David Sicardo On the principles of political economy and taxation
○ John Stuart Mill: The principle of political economy

Candle makers’ petition (1845)

● Satire of protectionists tariffs by French economist Frederic Bastiat
● Urged government to pass a law requiring curtains be shut during the day to protect
candlemakers against unfair competition from the sun
○ We candlemakers are suffering from the unfair competition of a foreign rival
○ Frieden discusses the tensions between producer protection and consumer
prices, these arguments are not new

What is political economy today?

Studied by both economist and political scientists

1. How politics affects the economy and how the economy shapes politics:
a. Political economy is inherently interdisciplinary
b. Recognizes that the policy economic analysis indicates is best for the
economy may not be politically feasible and vice versa
2. Using the tools of economics to study politics
a. Most commonly, this refers to using game theory to study political competition
b. This definition is somewhat dates because these tools are now common in
political science, nonetheless this is a common definition

,Common topics of study in PE
● Inequality
○ Across class, gender, race etc.
● Redistribution and taxes
● Economic development
● Globalization
● Energy, environment and climate change
● International trade and finance
○ Protectionism, trade agreements, capital controls
● Social interest politics
○ Lobbying, campaign finance
● Corruption

A theoretical and empirical discipline

● Normative vs. empirical questions:
○ Normative: Which should society value more, lower consumer prices or
protect jobs from foreign competition?
○ Empirical: Why can 1000 workers in one industry exert more political pressure
than 20 million consumers?
● Political economist don't usually take stands on complicated moral and ethical issues,
they try to understand why societies choose to do what they do
● But we do research how to reduce clearly harmful phenomena
○ E.g. corruption, negative externalities, climate change, poverty etc.

Capitalism

● Capitalism:
○ An economic system in which private actors own and control property in
accord with their interests and demand and supply freely set prices in markets
● Some essential features of capitalism:
○ Private property: allows people to own tangible and intangible assets
○ Self interests: people act in pursuit of their own good/profit motive
○ Competition: firms can enter and exit markets at their own will
○ Market mechanism: supply and demand determine prices
○ Consumer choice: consumers freedom of purchases
● Political economy approaches to capitalism:
○ Markets and competition do indeed set prices
○ But governments provide public goods that market forces will not create,
create the institutional foundations and laws that underpin markets and
enforces the rules
○ Government must also use its power to modernize the rules of the game as
circumstances, societal priorities or knowledge change

,What are the tools of economics:?

● Most commonly refers to game theory (aka formal theory of micro economics theory)
○ Mathematical models of strategic interactions among (usually) rational agents
○ Used to predict theoretical outcomes
○ Example of game theory: the prisoners’ dilemma

1. Game theory

● These kinds of simple models can become much more complex and underpin much
of modern day microeconomic theory
● These kinds of games can be applied to international trade deals, optimal campaign
strategies and even nuclear war
● Many theoretical predictions in political economy come from these kinds of models
○ For example, theories of producer dominance in government regulation

2. Statistical methods and experiments

● Often used to attempt to estimate causal effects
● Experiments use random assignment to ensure causality
○ If an article is described as an experiment, you know its a causal argument
● Correlation vs. causation, why do we care?

Correlation vs causation

● Examples from political economy:
○ Does providing development aid reduce corruption?
■ Even if corruption is reduced, how do we know it was the effect of the
aid and not something else?
○ Does donating money to a political campaign cause politicians to be more
likely to listen to you? Or do interest groups just donate to their allies, who are
more likely to listen anyway?
■ Observing a high correlation between donations and meetings does
not tell us the answer.
● Association = not a causal argument
● Effect = a causal effect

Problems with tools

1. These tools were not common in political science when this definition was devised,
they are today
a. Many theories in political science were devised by applying rational-choice
economic theory to political questions (e.g. voter behavior)
2. This definition implies that analyses that are 100% on the topic of the political are
political economy if certain tools are used and assumptions are made

, Some key definitions

● Theory and empirics
○ Theory = based on logical theories and hypotheses
○ Empirical = based on observation and data
● Causality vs association
○ Association = not a causal argument
○ Effect = a causal effect
● Endogeneity
○ Prevents us from making causal claims (i.e. you got the causation wrong)
○ The effect of one variable on another cannot be causally interpreted because
it includes omitted causes leading to biased estimates (e.g. the effect of
education on income)
● Institutions
○ Rules of the game of a society
■ Informal constraints (sanctions, customs etc.)
■ Formal rules (constitutions, laws)
○ Social institutions: The way people organize themselves
○ Political institutions: Rules, practices, regularities that constrain political
choices and activities
○ Electoral institutions: Type of electoral system (proportional, FPTP etc.)
● Rationality
○ Correspondence between the choices that a person makes and the interests
the person holds
○ Important: A rational-choice approach does not require us to assume that
people are always rational, or that institutions are chosen rationally. Rather it
holds that a rational-choice theory perspective enables us to generate a
theory with empirically refutable predictions
● Special interests
○ Examples: (wealthy) individuals, corporation, labor unions
○ Concentrated vs diffuse interests

International political economy

● Branch of international relations
○ Primary focus is international trade and international finance
○ Example of topics:
■ Exchange rate regimes
■ The role of i.e. IMF, World Bank
■ Protectionism and trade barriers (not domestically)
■ International financial crises
■ Liberal/capitalist peace theory
$7.18
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
bjorndekker

Document also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
bjorndekker Universiteit van Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
2
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
2
Documents
7
Last sold
1 year ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions