• Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen
  • Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
  • Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
  • Online lezen of als PDF
Verkopen
Kies je studieland
Kies je taal
Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 3 van de 20 pagina's
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

October 2023 Examination Answers - Law Of Damages Lpl4802

Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 3 van de 20 pagina's

QUESTION 1 NATURE AND ASSESSMENT OF NON-PATRIMONIAL LOSS (ESSAY) (a) Study Nemangwela v Road Accident Fund (437/2022) [2023] ZASCA (8 June 2023) case herein attached as well as the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 as amended and answer the question below: Write a critical appreciation/analysis of the court’s reasoning to disqualify the forklift as a motor vehicle for the purposes of claiming damages from the Road Accident Fund. Refer to the relevant case law and applicable legislation quoted and relied on, in this case. [15] (b) Study Motladile v Minister of Police (414/2022) [2023] ZASCA 94 (12 June 2023) case, herein attached and answer the question below: Evaluate the court’s dismissal of a ‘one size fits all’ approach to quantifying damages/compensation for wrongful arrest and detention. Use case law to support your answer. [10] [25 marks] 4 QUESTION 2 PATRIMONIAL LOSS: BODILY INJURY, DEATH ETC. Read the set of facts below and answer the questions that follow. While driving her BMW X5 2020 model, with registration number AD 54 XX GP, along R556 in Johannesburg, Ms Enne Martins was crashed into by a gas tanker truck belonging to EC Fuels (Pty) Ltd. The driver of the truck was in the wrong and EC Fuels (Pty) Ltd accepted liability. The BMW vehicle was damaged beyond repair. Enne lost the following items in the accident as well; spectacles, wristwatch and two laptops. She also suffered very serious bodily injuries as a result of which, she was admitted in a private hospital for 22 days, and thus missed her work. In terms of the doctors’ reports that she consulted, she had a broken pelvis that needed operation, a broken rib cage and a fractured left femur. It was diagnosed that because of these injuries, she would never regain her pre-accident gait. (a) Which items may not be claimed from the RAF? State the law that supports your answer. [4] (b) State two general damages and two special damages she may recover from the RAF. [4] (c) As per the facts above, Ms Enne was admitted in an expensive private hospital. What are her chances to claim full medical bills, if a provincial hospital could provide similar services? Use case law to support your answer. [7] (d) Ms Enne had recently accepted a better paying job as a Physical Trainer in a local soccer club. Evidence from the physiotherapist suggests that she may not be gainfully engaged in physically straining activities anymore. Discuss her chances of successfully claiming loss of earning capacity. [10] [25 marks] 5 QUESTION 3 COLLATERAL SOURCE RULE (a) Summarise the rules that underlie the principle of subrogation in instances where an insured person claims damages against the wrongdoer. Provide examples for each principle. [10] (b) X, a 35-year-old widow, whose husband was killed in a motor vehicle accident wants to know the prospects of successfully claiming loss of support against the Road Accident Fund. Explain fully, how her rights to claim such damages could be affected by the probability of re-partnership. [15] [25 marks] QUESTION 4 DRAFTING (NATURE AND ASSESSMENT OF NON-PATRIMONIAL LOSS) Read the facts below and answer the questions that follow. Ms P and Ms Y, both employees at Sunroof (Pty) Ltd had attended an interview at work, for a promotional position. Ms Y was successful in the interview and was ultimately hired into that position. Ms P was convinced that she deserved the job since she was more experienced than Ms Y but felt that because Ms Y had a romantic relationship with the HR manager, she had then been promoted undeservedly. To vent her frustration at missing out on the promotion, Ms P slashed Ms Y’s Mercedes Benz tyres, scratched the body of the vehicle all over and then went onto her X account (formerly Twitter) and slandered Ms Y. Ms Y wants to institute an action against Ms P. Assist Ms Y to draft particulars of claim to a Regional Magistrate Court, where she claims both general and specific damages. In your answer, provide your own times, places, values and other details of the claims. [25] [25 marks] TOTAL FOR THE PAPER: [100 MARKS] UNISA ©

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

LAW OF DAMAGES
LPL4802




27 OCTOBER 2023
EXAMINATION ANSWERS
.




*We are so confident in our answers, if you do not
receive a distinction, contact us for a full refund!

, HONESTY DECLARATION


Module Code: ....................... Assessment Date.................


1. I know that plagiarism means taking and using the ideas, writings, works or
inventions of another as if they were one’s own. I know that plagiarism not only
includes verbatim copying, but also the extensive use of another person’s ideas
without proper acknowledgement (which includes the proper use of quotation marks)
or any attempt to cheat the plagiarism checking system. I know that plagiarism
covers the use of material found in textual sources and from the Internet.
2. I acknowledge and understand that plagiarism is wrong.
3. I understand that my assignment/exam answers must be accurately referenced.
4. This assignment/exam file/portfolio is my own work. I acknowledge that copying
someone else’s work, or part of it, is wrong, and that submitting identical work to
others constitutes a form of plagiarism.
5. I have not allowed, nor will I in the future allow anyone to copy my work with the
intention of passing it off as their own work.
6. I understand that I can be awarded 0% if I have plagiarized.
7. I understand that my assignment/exam file/portfolio may be submitted
automatically to Turnitin.
8. I confirm that I have read and understood the following UNISA policies: 8.1 Policy
for Copyright and Plagiarism
8.2 Policy on Academic Integrity
8.3 Student Disciplinary Code




Name:………………
Signed:................ . Date...................

, NATURE AND ASSESSMENT OF NON-PATRIMONIAL LOSS (ESSAY)




(a) Study Nemangwela v Road Accident Fund (437/2022) [2023] ZASCA (8 June
2023) case herein attached as well as the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996
as amended and answer the question below:


Write a critical appreciation/analysis of the court’s reasoning to disqualify the
forklift as a motor vehicle for the purposes of claiming damages from the Road
Accident Fund. Refer to the relevant case law and applicable legislation
quoted and relied on, in this case.


The issue of whether a forklift constitutes as a 'motor vehicle' as per the Road
Accident Fund Act1 (the RAF Act) is intricate. The legal precedent of this recent
Supreme Court of Appeal case has raised substantial questions regarding the
definition and classification of motor vehicles under the Act, and hence their eligibility
for claims from the Road Accident Fund.


The Act defines a 'motor vehicle' as any vehicle designed or adapted for propulsion
or haulage on roads by means of fuel, gas, or electricity, including a trailer. The Act
exists mainly to provide cover to individuals against antecedent liabilities incurred
regarding bodily injuries or death inflicted on people by way of motor vehicle
accidents.


In the current case2, the SCA clarified the classification of the forklift as something
other than a motor vehicle on two fronts, operating location, and design purpose.


Firstly, it examined the operating area of the forklift. It was determined that the forklift
principally operated within the confines of a private property (Nzhelele Spar). It was
rarely, if ever, driven outside the premises or across a public road. This distinction is



1
Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996
2
Nemangwela v Road Accident Fund (437/2022) [2023] ZASCA (8 June
2023

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
24 oktober 2023
Aantal pagina's
20
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden
$6.19

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kan je een ander document kiezen. Je kan het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Verkocht
1377
Volgers
862
Items
63
Laatst verkocht
4 maanden geleden



Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen