Sophia Pathways English Composition II Touchstone 3.2 Study Guide Revisions

Sophia Pathways English Composition II Touchstone 3.2 Effectiveness of Capital Punishment in Deterring Homicide Crimes Countries and states that practice capital punishment (death penalty) express the rationale it helps to deter homicide crimes (Ehrlich, 2017). The proponents of death capital argue that the risk of future execution is enough deterrent of homicide crimes because it reduces the number of individuals who might be having intentions of involving themselves in heinous crimes they had otherwise planned. However, this claim has encountered opposition, mainly because of the moral and religious issues surrounding the death penalty (Nagin, 2018). Nevertheless, the opponents of capital punishment claim that it is inhuman and that there are other options that can be put in place as a way of punishing the homicide criminal and serving justice to the victims and their families. For example, the homicide criminal could serve life imprisonment, which is humane and less costly. Additionally, capital punishment is a government program that comes with cost implications. Although proponents of the death penalty claim that execution saves the government money, the modern death penalty has established to be quite expensive (Ehrlich, 2017). Notably, there exists a few research discoveries indicating that capital punishment has gotten expensive when contrasted with its expected advantages of daunting murder violations. The costs related to the death penalty are getting to an ever-increasing extent. Hence, the American death penalty framework is expensive to the citizens, and this makes one ask whether