ENG3702
Assignment 2 (ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2023
Introduction:
The text "You are what you don't eat" by Noah Rothman explores the
politicization of food by puritanical progressives. This essay critically analyzes
the role of the media in reporting on race relations within the context of the
text. The genre, language usage, writer's attitude, intended inferences,
ideological role, and personal stance on the views expressed will be
discussed.
Genre and Language:
The genre of the text is an opinion piece or editorial. The language used in the
text is persuasive and argumentative, aimed at shaping the readers' opinions
and influencing their beliefs. The author uses a combination of facts,
examples, and rhetoric to construct the context, purpose, and audience of the
text.
The context of the text is set by the title itself, "You are what you don't eat,"
which suggests a discussion about food choices and their impact on individual
identity. The author further elaborates on this by highlighting the growing trend
of "puritanical progressives" who politicize food. By framing the issue in this
way, the author is trying to convey that these progressives are imposing their
beliefs on others and infringing on personal choices.
The purpose of the text is to criticize and challenge the actions and attitudes
of these "puritanical progressives." The author aims to persuade the readers
, that their approach to food and race relations is misguided and harmful. This
can be seen in the author's argument that "food has become the latest frontier
on which social justice warriors contend" and that this trend is a result of "a
deeply and inherently political impulse" rather than a genuine concern for
individual health or race relations. By using strong language and engaging
rhetoric, the author tries to convince the audience that this politicization of
food is a problem that needs to be addressed.
The audience of the text is likely to be those interested in current affairs,
politics, and social issues. The author assumes that the readers have some
knowledge of current debates surrounding food choices and race relations.
The author also seems to address those who may already hold negative
opinions about the "puritanical progressives" or are skeptical of their actions.
The language used in the text is aimed at engaging and reinforcing the beliefs
of this audience, with the hope of further solidifying their position and
garnering support against the politicization of food.
Therefore, the genre of the text is an opinion piece that uses persuasive
language to construct its context, purpose, and audience. The author relies on
various sources to support their argument, but their credibility is unclear. The
text employs emotional techniques to engage the audience and relies on
biased portrayals of the "puritanical progressives." However, the text does not
comprehensively analyze the role of the media in reporting on race relations
and has limitations in terms of evidence and alternative perspectives.
Attitude of the Writer:
The attitude of the writer towards the subject of the text is critical. The writer,
Noah Rothman, takes a critical stance against what he calls "puritanical
progressives" who politicize food. He argues that these individuals are
imposing their beliefs and values onto others, particularly in the context of
race relations concerning food consumption. Rothman appears to be strongly
opposed to this form of politicization, as he believes it undermines personal
freedoms and choice.
The main arguments made by the writer:
a. Personal freedom and choice: The writer argues that individuals should
be able to make their own choices about what they eat without being
judged or criticized. He highlights the importance of personal freedom
and autonomy in deciding one's dietary preferences.
b. Cultural diversity: Rothman emphasizes the value of cultural diversity,
particularly in relation to food. He believes that by imposing restrictions
Assignment 2 (ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2023
Introduction:
The text "You are what you don't eat" by Noah Rothman explores the
politicization of food by puritanical progressives. This essay critically analyzes
the role of the media in reporting on race relations within the context of the
text. The genre, language usage, writer's attitude, intended inferences,
ideological role, and personal stance on the views expressed will be
discussed.
Genre and Language:
The genre of the text is an opinion piece or editorial. The language used in the
text is persuasive and argumentative, aimed at shaping the readers' opinions
and influencing their beliefs. The author uses a combination of facts,
examples, and rhetoric to construct the context, purpose, and audience of the
text.
The context of the text is set by the title itself, "You are what you don't eat,"
which suggests a discussion about food choices and their impact on individual
identity. The author further elaborates on this by highlighting the growing trend
of "puritanical progressives" who politicize food. By framing the issue in this
way, the author is trying to convey that these progressives are imposing their
beliefs on others and infringing on personal choices.
The purpose of the text is to criticize and challenge the actions and attitudes
of these "puritanical progressives." The author aims to persuade the readers
, that their approach to food and race relations is misguided and harmful. This
can be seen in the author's argument that "food has become the latest frontier
on which social justice warriors contend" and that this trend is a result of "a
deeply and inherently political impulse" rather than a genuine concern for
individual health or race relations. By using strong language and engaging
rhetoric, the author tries to convince the audience that this politicization of
food is a problem that needs to be addressed.
The audience of the text is likely to be those interested in current affairs,
politics, and social issues. The author assumes that the readers have some
knowledge of current debates surrounding food choices and race relations.
The author also seems to address those who may already hold negative
opinions about the "puritanical progressives" or are skeptical of their actions.
The language used in the text is aimed at engaging and reinforcing the beliefs
of this audience, with the hope of further solidifying their position and
garnering support against the politicization of food.
Therefore, the genre of the text is an opinion piece that uses persuasive
language to construct its context, purpose, and audience. The author relies on
various sources to support their argument, but their credibility is unclear. The
text employs emotional techniques to engage the audience and relies on
biased portrayals of the "puritanical progressives." However, the text does not
comprehensively analyze the role of the media in reporting on race relations
and has limitations in terms of evidence and alternative perspectives.
Attitude of the Writer:
The attitude of the writer towards the subject of the text is critical. The writer,
Noah Rothman, takes a critical stance against what he calls "puritanical
progressives" who politicize food. He argues that these individuals are
imposing their beliefs and values onto others, particularly in the context of
race relations concerning food consumption. Rothman appears to be strongly
opposed to this form of politicization, as he believes it undermines personal
freedoms and choice.
The main arguments made by the writer:
a. Personal freedom and choice: The writer argues that individuals should
be able to make their own choices about what they eat without being
judged or criticized. He highlights the importance of personal freedom
and autonomy in deciding one's dietary preferences.
b. Cultural diversity: Rothman emphasizes the value of cultural diversity,
particularly in relation to food. He believes that by imposing restrictions
