100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Task 2 - Filicides

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
22
Uploaded on
27-09-2023
Written in
2023/2024

Summary of Task 2 in Forensic and Legal Psychology in a Nutshell

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
September 27, 2023
Number of pages
22
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

TASK 2: FILICIDE
WHAT IS FILICIDE?

 Filicide = homicides committed by a (foster-, step-) parent, with victim aged under 18
 Infanticide = killing of a child younger than 12 months
 Neonaticide = killing of infants in the first 24h of life
 Familicide – includes spouse & child victims: 1/3 of filicide-suicide cases
 Many samples are small  findings are sample specific – WHAT DO ALL THESE
STUDIES SHARE???


CLASSIFYING FILICIDE (PUTKONEN ET AL.)

 Filicide is a quite rare crime
 Global homicide rates of children aged 0-4: 5.3 per 100,000 children
 Global homicide rates of children aged 5-14 years: 2.05 per 100,000 children
 Many cases are never reported  true rate may be considerably higher
 Several classifications of filicide


Resnick’s 5-  Focused on motives: (1) altruistic, (2) acutely psychotic, (3) unwanted
category child, (4) accidental, (5) spousal revenge
classification  Remains influential today – “unwanted child” most commonly
reported motive for neonaticide

 Features that have to be taken into account to classify filicides: (1) family’s social
situation & domestic arrangements, (2) offender’s gender, (3) mental health status, (4)
criminal history, (5) substance-abuse history, (6) age of offender & victim, (7) method
of killing, (8) offender’s motives
 None of the classifications of filicide in the past have been universally accepted
 This study: create a classification scheme for filicide taking into consideration all
relevant features

METHODS

Data  Register-based, comprehensive nationwide data from Austria & Finland
collecting  Similar legal traditions & social systems
 All recorded filicide cases between 1995 & 2005
 Data on children were collected from coroner reports & death
certificates

Variables  Selection of variables based on other studies on filicide, homicide &
homicide-suicide
 Final variables: (1) offender’s history, (2) pre-offense circumstances, (3)
circumstances during the crime

, Data  124 offenders & 152 victims
description  63% mothers & 36% fathers
 15% of mothers & 38% of fathers committed suicide at the crime scene
 Fathers were sig. older (37.5) than mothers (31.6)
 34% of children were younger than 1 year

RESULTS

 5 classes of filicidal parents


Homicidal-  Most common motive: extended suicide, jealousy as underlying motive
Suicidal  2nd most likely to be married, at highest risk for separation
Fathers  Most likely to be employed, least educated
(14%)  The oldest group
 Intoxicated at the time of the crime more frequently than members of
another class
 Victims were 2nd least likely to be infants
 Previous incidents of domestic violence were 2nd most common
 Have a lot in common with homicide offenders who have killed intimate
partners & familicide offenders
 Method of killing: shooting more common than in any other class

Violent,  Motive: highest incidence of filicide as impulsive act (“accident”)
Impulsive  Less likely to have been working at the time of the crime
Parents  More likely to have exhibited features of conduct disorder during their
(11%) childhood
 2nd most infant victims
 Most likely to have had a criminal record before & to have been
responsible for earlier incidents of domestic violence
 Most similar with average homicide offender in Finnland
 Method of killing: battering was more common than in any other class

Single,  Motive: psychotic motives were 2nd most frequent, 3rd in terms of
Sober extended suicide
Parents  Least often intoxicated at time of the crime & least likely to have acted on
(28%) impulse
 Prior dealings with authorities on matters concerning their children
more often than any other class except Violent, Impulsive Parents
 69% of this group were mothers
 2nd oldest group
 No infant victims

Prosocial,  Motive: psychotic, 2nd in terms of extended suicide

, Psychotic  Most were not working at the time of the crime
Parents  Majority of people were married
(24%)  Most highly educated
 Almost no previous record of family violence & dealing with authorities
 73% of the group were mothers

Infanticidal  Motive: to get rid of unwanted child, no cases of psychotic / extended
Mothers suicide motivation
(23%)  The youngest + had the youngest victims
 Almost no previous dealings with authorities
 Methods of killing: suffocation was most common choice

DISCUSSION

 Some overlapping group characteristics
 Important general characteristics of filicide offenders like depression
 Among impulsive parents infants may be more likely to provoke (mis)perceptions of the
child’s behaviour & rage

STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS

 Data more comprehensive in many ways than those used in earlier studies
 Data from 2 countries  enhances generalisability of results BUT only within Europe
 Cultural issues could not be analysed
 Statistical analyses were limited  size of material quite small
 Retrospective study  no actual risk assessment / assessment of causality


THE WORLDWIDE INCIDENCE OF NEONATICIDE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TANAKA ET AL.)

METHODS

 Computerised systematic literature search for studies reporting the incidence of
neonaticide
 Only original population-based studies were selected  12 studies

RESULTS

 24 nationwide, regional, or local estimates of neonaticide incidence in 13 countries
 National rates – lowest in Finland & highest in Austria
 Subnational level – highest in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, lowest around Paris

DISCUSSION

 No reliable estimates of the dark number of neonaticides
 Legal definition of newborn murder varies from country to country significantly
 E.g., Finland has a very narrow definition – may account for the low figures
$4.22
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
emma2296 Maastricht University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
31
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
3
Documents
30
Last sold
3 months ago

1.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions