LAW OF EVIDENCE/ LEV3701 ASSIGNMENT 02 PACK DUE ON 6TH OF SEPTEMBER
2023 FOR SEMESTER TWO/2 UNISA. DISTINCTION QUANTEED. QUESTIONS DO
NOT CHANGE JUST SEARCH RELEVANT QUESTONS IN LINE WITH PROVIDED
ANSWERS ON THIS ASSIGNMENT PACK. FOR MORE HELP, WHATSAP SILAS ON
072 439 6681/ EMAIL:
A bank robbery is executed, and teller A and customer B witness the incident and can
identify accused C as the perpetrator. A and B are prosecution witnesses. Consider the
following statements and choose the correct option:
,1.
When the defence conducts their re-examination of A, they will attempt to elicit evidence
to support C’s case and to cast doubt upon the credibility of A’s testimony.
2.
The prosecution is allowed to ask A and B leading questions during examination-in-chief
on facts which are not in dispute.
3.
It later becomes clear that B is related to C and intends to prejudice the prosecution's
case with his testimony. The prosecution can ask the court to declare B an unfavourable
witness and can then cross-examine him.
4.
The prosecution will be allowed to cross-examine A on any issue arising from re-
examination.
2. [22:00, 04/09/2023] ?: Consider the following statements and choose the correct
option:
, 1.
Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 protects an accused against
answering certain questions during cross-examination, but this protection falls away
where the accused is charged with the crime of fraud.
2.
Section 197(d) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 allows for the presentation of
evidence of an accused’s previous conviction for possession of dagga if this evidence
serves to counter a defence by the accused that he does not know dagga.
3.
Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 protects an accused against
answering certain questions during cross-examination, but this protection falls away
where the accused is charged with the crime of murder.
4.
Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 protects an accused against
answering certain questions during cross-examination, but this protection falls away
where the accused is charged with the crime of receiving stolen property.
2023 FOR SEMESTER TWO/2 UNISA. DISTINCTION QUANTEED. QUESTIONS DO
NOT CHANGE JUST SEARCH RELEVANT QUESTONS IN LINE WITH PROVIDED
ANSWERS ON THIS ASSIGNMENT PACK. FOR MORE HELP, WHATSAP SILAS ON
072 439 6681/ EMAIL:
A bank robbery is executed, and teller A and customer B witness the incident and can
identify accused C as the perpetrator. A and B are prosecution witnesses. Consider the
following statements and choose the correct option:
,1.
When the defence conducts their re-examination of A, they will attempt to elicit evidence
to support C’s case and to cast doubt upon the credibility of A’s testimony.
2.
The prosecution is allowed to ask A and B leading questions during examination-in-chief
on facts which are not in dispute.
3.
It later becomes clear that B is related to C and intends to prejudice the prosecution's
case with his testimony. The prosecution can ask the court to declare B an unfavourable
witness and can then cross-examine him.
4.
The prosecution will be allowed to cross-examine A on any issue arising from re-
examination.
2. [22:00, 04/09/2023] ?: Consider the following statements and choose the correct
option:
, 1.
Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 protects an accused against
answering certain questions during cross-examination, but this protection falls away
where the accused is charged with the crime of fraud.
2.
Section 197(d) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 allows for the presentation of
evidence of an accused’s previous conviction for possession of dagga if this evidence
serves to counter a defence by the accused that he does not know dagga.
3.
Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 protects an accused against
answering certain questions during cross-examination, but this protection falls away
where the accused is charged with the crime of murder.
4.
Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 protects an accused against
answering certain questions during cross-examination, but this protection falls away
where the accused is charged with the crime of receiving stolen property.
