Question 1
Question 1.1:
∀x (Brown(x) ∧ dog(x) → hairy(x))
Question 1.2:
∃x (Corgi(x) ∧ ∀y (Loves(x, y)))
Question 1.3:
∀x ∃y (Corgi(y) ∧ Loves(x, y))
Question 1.4:
∀x ∀y (Pancakes(x) ∧ Pancakes(y) → TasteSimilar(x, y))
, Question 1.5:
∀x ∃y,z (Person(x) ∧ Knows(x, y) ∧ Knows(x, z) ∧ y ≠ z)
Question 2
Question 2.1:
There exists an actor who does not play in "Days and Years" and does not watch "Days and Years".
Question 2.2:
Faro plays in "Fourth Street" or Faro plays in "Enemies or not?", but not both.
Question 2.3:
If "Fourth Street" is not a soap opera and "Days and Years" is a soap opera, then Faro or Rudo
watches "Enemies or not?".
Question 2.4:
For every actor, if they play in "Enemies or not?" and do not watch "Enemies or not?", then they play
in "Fourth Street".
Question 2.5:
Faro watches "Fourth Street" and Rudo watches "Fourth Street" if and only if Faro plays in "Fourth
Street" and Rudo plays in "Fourth Street".
Question 3
To show that the given expressions are logically equivalent, we can apply De Morgan's laws:
De Morgan's laws state:
1) ¬(P ∧ Q) ≡ ¬P ∨ ¬Q (De Morgan's law for conjunction)
2) ¬(P ∨ Q) ≡ ¬P ∧ ¬Q (De Morgan's law for disjunction)
Using De Morgan's laws, we can rewrite the original expression as follows:
¬(∃x Red(x) ∧ ∀y Cubes(y))
Question 1.1:
∀x (Brown(x) ∧ dog(x) → hairy(x))
Question 1.2:
∃x (Corgi(x) ∧ ∀y (Loves(x, y)))
Question 1.3:
∀x ∃y (Corgi(y) ∧ Loves(x, y))
Question 1.4:
∀x ∀y (Pancakes(x) ∧ Pancakes(y) → TasteSimilar(x, y))
, Question 1.5:
∀x ∃y,z (Person(x) ∧ Knows(x, y) ∧ Knows(x, z) ∧ y ≠ z)
Question 2
Question 2.1:
There exists an actor who does not play in "Days and Years" and does not watch "Days and Years".
Question 2.2:
Faro plays in "Fourth Street" or Faro plays in "Enemies or not?", but not both.
Question 2.3:
If "Fourth Street" is not a soap opera and "Days and Years" is a soap opera, then Faro or Rudo
watches "Enemies or not?".
Question 2.4:
For every actor, if they play in "Enemies or not?" and do not watch "Enemies or not?", then they play
in "Fourth Street".
Question 2.5:
Faro watches "Fourth Street" and Rudo watches "Fourth Street" if and only if Faro plays in "Fourth
Street" and Rudo plays in "Fourth Street".
Question 3
To show that the given expressions are logically equivalent, we can apply De Morgan's laws:
De Morgan's laws state:
1) ¬(P ∧ Q) ≡ ¬P ∨ ¬Q (De Morgan's law for conjunction)
2) ¬(P ∨ Q) ≡ ¬P ∧ ¬Q (De Morgan's law for disjunction)
Using De Morgan's laws, we can rewrite the original expression as follows:
¬(∃x Red(x) ∧ ∀y Cubes(y))