What was the Federalists' argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the
Constitution?
A separate bill of rights might be used later to limit rights that were not originally listed.
After nine states had ratified the Constitution by mid-1788,
it became law in the United States.
Which is one reason Southern states were generally opposed to the ratification of
the Constitution?
The disagreed with the Three-Fifths Compromise.
Stability in government is essential to national character and to the advantages
annexed to it, as well as to that repose and confidence in the minds of the people,
which are among the chief blessings of civil society.
—James Madison, "Federalist Number 37," 1788
According to Madison, what are the "chief blessings of civil society"?
a stable government valued by citizens
The "Federalist Papers" mainly argued that the Constitution
would ensure that a strong federal government had its power held in check by its three
branches.
Which statement best explains the Three-Fifths Compromise?
For the purposes of determining the population of a state, three out of every five
enslaved people would be counted.
The Federalists favored the Constitution as the basis of a new government
because they
wanted a strong central government.
The Anti-Federalists favored strong state governments because
they believed that was the best way to protect people's liberty
Which of the original thirteen states refused to attend the Constitutional
Convention?
Rhode Island
When the Constitution first became law in 1788,
New York and Virginia had not ratified it.
When was a state obligated to follow the Constitution?
after that state had ratified it
Why did the Federalists approve of the separation of powers in the Constitution?
They thought it was necessary to protect the liberty of Americans.
What made Virginia and New York finally agree to ratify the Constitution?
A bill of rights was added.
The Anti-Federalists' main objection to ratifying the Constitution was that it
had no bill of rights.
What was the Federalists' argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the
Constitution?
A separate bill of rights might be used later to limit rights that were not originally listed.
The Anti-Federalists were against