Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Overig

Business Law and Practice Model Answers

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
9
Geüpload op
29-04-2023
Geschreven in
2019/2020

Model answers to core module BLP - practice assessment and one other past paper (questions included in the text).

Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Allotting Shares
Spoils Limited (the ‘Company’) has an issued share capital of 2,000 ordinary shares of £1 each
which were issued at nominal value - no premium. The Company is proposing to allot 1,000
preference shares of £1 each, for cash at nominal value. These preference shares will carry the
right to a xed (capped) annual dividend of 5% of the nominal value of the shares and a xed
(capped) right to participate in the assets of the Company on a winding up. The Company was
incorporated in 1999 and its memorandum of association states that it has an authorised share
capital of £2,000, divided into 2,000 ordinary shares of £1 each. When the Company was
incorporated it was not envisaged that it would issue preference shares. The Company has not
reviewed its articles since the Companies Act 2006 came into force.

Based on these facts, which of the following statements is/are CORRECT?
i) The Company can pass an ordinary resolution under the transitional arrangements to remove
the restriction in its articles deriving from the authorised share capital with which it was
registered under the Companies Act 1985.
ii) The Company will need to grant its directors authority to allot the preference shares.
iii) A share premium account would need to be created.
iv) The Company will need to amend its Articles of Association.


Choose ONE of the following options:
[A] i), ii) and iv) - s551 (more than one class of shares) - states that directors of a company can
only allot shares if they are authorised to do so by the company’s articles or by resolution of the
company. As the Articles are pre CA 2006, the company will need to pass an ordinary resolution
to grant the directors this power, if they do not have it already.
[B] i) only
[C] i), ii) and iii)
[D] ii) and iv)



Legal Compatibility
Paramatta Limited (‘Paramatta’) was incorporated in 2015 and currently has unamended Model
Articles. Paramatta’s two shareholders, Craig and Siobhan, each own 50 shares. Craig and
Siobhan are the only directors of Paramatta. Craig (who is the chairman) and Siobhan have
suggested a number of amendments that they would like to make to Paramatta’s articles. There is
no shareholders’ agreement in place.

Which ONE of the following proposed amendments to Paramatta’s articles is NOT legally
compatible with the Companies Act 2006?

[A] ‘Subject to Model Article 18, for the purposes of s.168 of the Companies Act 2006, no director
shall be removed from o ce except by a unanimous resolution of the shareholders in general
meeting’. - such an amendment should be made via shareholders’ resolution - it fetters the power
of the company/shareholders, and imposes a higher restriction than the MA.
[B] ‘If the number of votes for or against a proposal at a meeting of the directors are equal, the
chairman or other director chairing the meeting shall not have a casting vote. Model Article 13 is
deleted’. - MA (2) leaves this, to some extent, up to the articles
[C] ‘Subject to s.318(1) of the Companies Act 2006, the quorum at a general meeting shall be two
shareholders’. - s318(1) says that one person is needed in a company with only one member;
Paramatta has two members.
[D] ‘Any director may call a directors’ meeting by giving not less than 10 days’ notice of the
meeting to the directors’. - Browne v Trinidad - the company could be de ning a notice period




fi ffi fi fi

, Tax
Sonja has Taxable Income of £44,280 during the year ending 5 April 2020, of which:

(a) £5,000 is savings income from Bardale Bank plc, and
(b) £1,300 is dividend income from Vodacall Group plc, what will Sonja's total income tax liability
be for that year?
You may assume there have been no deductions for PAYE and you should round down each
individual gure to the nearest pound at each stage of the calculation.

Choose ONE of the following options:
[A] £9,692
[B] £9,492
[C] £17,712
[D] £9,914

44,280 - (5,000 + 1,300) = 37,980

INCOME
37,500 x 20% = 7,500
+ 480 x 40% = 192
= 7,692

SAVINGS
higher rate, so PSA is £500
500 x 0% = 0
+ 4,500 x 40% = 1,800

DIVIDEND
No dividend taxable, as rst £2,000 is tax-free

therefore:
7,692 + 1,800 = 9,492


Shelf Companies
You are preparing a Price Prior shelf company for transfer to your client Hemmingford Limited
(‘Hemmingford’). All Price Prior shelf companies are private limited companies and have
unamended Model Articles as their Articles of Association. It is proposed that the shelf company
will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hemmingford.

Which of the following statements are INCORRECT?

i) Hemmingford must pay up one quarter of the shelf company’s share capital before a certi cate
of incorporation will be issued by Companies House for the shelf company. only for plc
ii) An ordinary resolution must be passed to approve the appointment of the shelf company’s rst
auditors. This can be done by directors at a board meeting
iii) A trading certi cate will need to be issued by Companies House before the shelf company can
commence trading in its own right. only for plc
iv) The shelf company is required by s.154 of the Companies Act 2006 to have a minimum of two
directors once it is transferred to Hemmingford. This section states that public companies must
have 2 directors; private companies only need one.

Choose ONE of the following options:
[A] ii) and iii)
[B] i), iii) and iv)
[C] i), ii) and iv)
[D] All of them





fi fi fi fi fi

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
29 april 2023
Aantal pagina's
9
Geschreven in
2019/2020
Type
OVERIG
Persoon
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

$30.17
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
natalieetn Stuvia
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
32
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
31
Documenten
8
Laatst verkocht
2 jaar geleden

3.0

3 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
1

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen