100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

Trespass and Nuisance

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Uploaded on
02-04-2023
Written in
2021/2022

law surrounding trespass and nuisance

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Unknown
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
April 2, 2023
Number of pages
3
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Michaela parkin
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

MN10442 1st April


3 types of trespass
 To goods
 To land
 To the person – assault, battery, false imprisonment

Trespass to goods
 The unlawful, intentional, direct interference with goods in possession of another

Assault (to the person)
 An intentional act that causes another person reasonably to apprehend immediate
violence to their person.
 Don’t have to touch someone to assault them
 Read v coker [1853] – read is a rent collector and went to the garage to collect the
rent. Coker didn’t have the money to pay, and the mechanics surrounded him and
intimidated him.

Battery (to the person)
 The direct and intentional application of force to another person without their
consent
 Nash v sheen [1953] – went to the hairdresser to get hair dyed but instead, the
hairdresser put in hair removal cream.

False imprisonment (to the person)
 The unlawful prevention of another from exercising their freedom of movement
 Sayers v Harlow urban district council [1958] – Sayers was using public toilets, but
the lock broke so in trying to get out she tried to climb over but fell and broke her
arm and ankle. She claimed false imprisonment but as the council hadn’t
intentionally locked her in there the court ruled against her.
 R (on the application of Hannah McClure and Joshua moos) v the commissioner of
the police metropolis [2012] – crowd control. Big protest against the g20 and protest
against climate change. Each group had given their route and info to the police. The
g20 protest was assumed to be more aggressive and angrier with high tension.
Climate change had a good vibe dancing and singing no anger. When the protests
were moving they were going to go into each other so the police held up the climate
change protest to allow the other protest to go by. The climate change protest was
held up for over 7 hours without letting them go anywhere. Sued police for false
imprisonment in the public interest it was justified however.


Trespass to land
 The unlawful and unjustifiable interference with land which is in the possession of
another
 Cujus est solum ejus est usque ad coelum et ad inferos – “for whoever owns the soil,
it is theirs all the way up to heaven and down to hell”
$5.55
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
harveygurner2

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
harveygurner2 University of Bath
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
30
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions