100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

OCR History revision notes: 'The Changing Nature of Warfare' Chapter 2 Unit 1 - Industrialisation and technology

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
5
Uploaded on
27-02-2023
Written in
2021/2022

Key revision notes for unit 2.1, 'the impact of industrialisation and technology', from the OCR History course 'The Changing Nature of Warfare '.

Institution
Module









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
February 27, 2023
Number of pages
5
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Other
Person
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

2.1 The impact of industrialisation and technology
Industrialisation: “the development of large scale and developed industries which used machines in
factories to enable mass production, precision engineering, and technological innovation”

Mass production

French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars

 Industrial developments had a limited impact on the nature and outcome of the wars
o Few significant improvements in weapons available
o Industry had not yet brought about the large-scale production of weapons that
could bring about mass destruction
 However, the increased role of the state in taking over industry did see greater production
of weapons like artillery
o Battle of Wagram 1809: 500 cannons on both sides

The American Civil War

 The first war where outproducing the enemy = as important as fighting them
o Grant’s strategy of attrition relied on exploiting superior Union resources and
productive capacity, as the South could not hope to match them
 It was the industrial capacity of the North that decided the ultimate outcome
o In 1860 the North produced 97% of US firearms and 94% of its pig iron
o Overall the North had 10 times the productive capacity of the South
o Confederate productive capacity was impacted even further by the Union blockade
and Sherman’s 1864 march to the sea which targeted industrial centres
 This war was the first sign of industrialisation turning war into a contest of economic
strength

The Wars of Unification

 Mass production and the industrial strength of Prussia saw victory over the less industrially
and economically developed Austria
o Industrialisation = ability to equip entirety of Prussian forces with modern weaponry
such as the superior breech-loading Dreyse needle gun (marked change from the
Napoleonic Wars where only a select few ‘elite’ units in the British army were armed
with the Baker rifle)

The First World War

 Industrialisation ensured that war had a greater human cost
o Mass production of machine guns meant that a small number of soldiers could hold
territory and inflict large-scale casualties, such as the British at the 1914 Battle of
Mons
o Industrialisation saw the mass production of large artillery weapons and millions of
shells
 Battle of the Somme 1916: British fired over 1.5 million shells in a week-long
preliminary bombardment
 In 1916 Russia produced 4.5 million shells a month
 Mass production and the increase in industrial capacity meant WW1 lasted far longer than
the Wars of Unification

, o 3-year stalemate on Western Front caused by scale of defensive weaponry and
continuous supplying of armies on the front line
 War increasingly becoming a contest of economic strength by WW1
o Mass production meant competent economic organisation became increasingly
important. Germany’s war economy was not as strong or well managed as France
and Britain’s
 The Hindenburg Programme of 1916 was unrealistic and its production
targets were not met
o The Allies were able to produce far more tanks than the Germans
 By 1918 the Allies had produced hundreds of tanks compared to the
Germans’ 20
 At the Battle of Amiens (August 1918) Rawlinson achieved a breakthrough
using over 500 tanks
o Allied industrial output was over 3 times greater than that of the Central Powers

The Second World War

 Germany’s failure to win a quick war in Russia turned WW2 into a contest of rival economies
and productive capacity
o Soviet productive capacity was significantly larger than that of Germany; this
enabled a war of attrition which swallowed up vast amounts of German resources
o The German panzer was individually superior to the Soviet T-34, but the Soviets
were able to produce over 80,000 T-34 tanks
o The USSR’s ability to go on the counterattack in 1943 depended on mass production
of tanks and heavy artillery
 Germany was consistently outproduced by the Allies throughout the war
o Germany was behind in production of combat aircraft. By 1944:
 Germany was producing 40,000
 The British Empire was producing 47,000
 The USA was producing 114,000
o Mass production enabled Allies to maintain air supremacy and win the war in the
skies
 Mass production of landing craft enabled the Allies’ various amphibious landings, including
most importantly D-Day in June 1944

Precision engineering

Precision engineering enabled the development of new weapons technology, particularly through
the rifling of small arms and cannons & breech-loading technology

The Crimean War

 The British and French enjoyed overwhelming technological superiority over the Russians
thanks to more developed industry
o They possessed better artillery and rifles
o The Russians relied on the smoothbore musket, while the Allies used the rifle-
musket
 This was accurate up to 600 yards – 5x the range of Russian muskets
 Battle of Inkerman 1854: British infantry successfully repulsed Russian
frontal assaults using Lee Enfield rifles
$4.12
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
lilyrandall University of Bristol
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
12
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
3
Documents
9
Last sold
6 months ago
Revision notes for top grades

In 2022 I achieved 3 A*s in A-level French, History, and English Literature, and am now studying history at the University of Bristol. I am selling simple but comprehensive notes that cover content explicitly detailed in exam board specifications, but which also include key facts and information that distinguished me as someone who researched beyond what was written in the textbook. My notes are logical, easy to understand and are formatted in a way that makes them easy to digest and remember. Feel free to send me a message!

Read more Read less
4.7

3 reviews

5
2
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions