100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

MAW-INT: Qualitative Research Methods

Rating
-
Sold
2
Pages
64
Uploaded on
10-10-2022
Written in
2022/2023

Notes of the lectures of Qualitative Research Methods. MTO-E

Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
October 10, 2022
Number of pages
64
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
E.m.j., peperkamp
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

MTO-E: Qualitative Research Methods
Lecture 1

Qualitative: Quantitative:
- Understanding how and why - Measuring how many and causality
- Theory emergent (inductive) - Theory testing (deductive)
- Words & text - Variables & numbers
- Participant’s view - Researcher’s view
- Proximity - Distance
- Process - Static
- Unstructured/open - Structured
- Rich, deep data - Hard, ‘reliable data
- Interpretation - Measuring
(interview)
Example of a quantitative study
From the abstract:
‘’The present paper reports findings from a survey of over 1700 employees of 36
organizations in New Zealand. We describe the reported incidence of bullying at work, along
with relevant work attitudes and experiences, including psychological strain, ratings of
subjective well-being, and levels of commitment to the organization. Personal experience of
bullying was reported by 17.8% of respondents, and was significantly correlated with higher
levels of strain, reduced well-being, reduced commitment to their organization, and lower
self-rated performance.’’

Example of a qualitative study
From the abstract:
A qualitative methodology is adopted. In total, 30 semi-structured interviews were
conducted with frontline employees and management in an organization comprising several
retail outlets.
A qualitative methodology is adopted. In total, 30 semi-structured interviews were
conducted with frontline employees and management in an organization compromising
several retail outlets.
The interviews reveal that although participants experienced a variety of behaviours
associated with workplace bullying and harassment, these behaviours were commonly
ignored or neglected until they escalated into confrontation and threatened productivity
and profitability. Employees and supervisory staff had minimal appreciation, practical skills
or training on how to deal effectively with negative workplace behaviours.

,Typical research questions
Qualitative research:
- Open questions (starting with how and what)
- Focused on understanding, developing concepts
- Dealing with complex matters for which people need many words to address these:
experiences, meaning
- Dealing with processes
Quantitative research:
- Hypotheses or closed questions
- Focused on measuring, causality and correlation
- Dealing with subjects that can be operationalized into variables: satisfaction,
motivation
- Dealing with measuring established concepts, such as ‘life satisfaction’, ‘place
attachment’, ‘psychological strain’


Research purposes
- Exploratory (Ritchie & Lewis: contextual): explore a phenomenon (at the start of the
research), what exists? Quantitative: counting ‘how many’, qualitative: which
features?
- Descriptive (Ritchie & Lewis: contextual (descriptive)): addressing ‘what’ questions,
what is the form or nature of what exists? More focused than exploratory research
- Explanatory (R & L): addressing ‘why’ questions:
o Quantitative: surveys and experiments, measuring, calculating correlations
between variables, building causal models
o Qualitative research: studying underlying structures, mechanisms and
processes to explain certain behaviours, actions, or events.
- Evaluative (R & L): appraising the effectiveness of what exists (policy
implementations f.e.)
- Generative (R & L): to develop theories, strategies or actions.

,Box 2.1 overview of the different purposes of research




Qualitative or quantitative research?
1. How do pensioners experience getting retired?  qualitative
2. What are the most important factors that influence the career choices of Australian
university students?  quantitative
3. What is the relationship between study time and exam scores among university
students?  quantitative

Foundations- paradigms
Ontology, epistemology and paradigms in social science research

Learning goals:
- Know the implications of adopting a particular paradigm
- Recognize research traditions and paradigms in publications

Ontology: assumptions about the nature of reality
Ontological beliefs influence both the kind of topics you want to research and the way you
want to do research.
Ontological beliefs influence epistemological beliefs, i.e. beliefs about how we can acquire
knowledge.

, Two major positions in social science: objectivism (we can see and touch) and
constructionism (our social life is constructed, it is something that we have constructed in
our minds (friendship))
(note: Ritchie & Lewis use different names: realism & idealism, BUT objectivism and
constructionism are more current.)

Ontology
It’s a pipe…  objectivism/ realism
It’s not a pipe… it’s a painting of a pipe.
Or: it is a painting of something that we recognize as being a pipe

It is a representation, or a construction (on paper, or perhaps only in our
minds)


Constructionism/ idealism

Epistemology: assumptions about the nature of knowledge
Objectivism  empiricism
Constructionism interpretivism (more critical view): how people construct meaning from
their experiences.

Language
A matter of life and death
Web-based interactive simulated family meeting: imagine a beloved family member having
been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) on life support

Actor playing in the ICU doctor tells family that their loved one has a 10% likelihood of
survival in the event of cardiac arrest requiring CPR

Actor asks family about the decision they want to take in case a cardiac arrest occurs:
 Framing the alternative of CPR as ‘’Allow Natural Death’’ significantly decreased the
family’s choice of CPR for their loved ones: 49% vs 61%
 Framing the decision as the social norm also significantly affected CPR choice.
If CPR was framed as the norm 64% of the families chose it
If no CPR was the norm, 48% chose CPR

Ontology + epistemology= paradigm
$5.87
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
MilouV1 Tilburg University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
32
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
20
Documents
18
Last sold
1 month ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions