Jack is accused of raping a fellow student. During cross-
examination of the victim, it is put to her that she is lying about the identity of the
accused. In an attempt to establish the victim's credibility, the prosecutor calls her
roommate to testify that the complainant told her a similar story. The roommate’s
evidence will be
(a) hearsay.
(b) evidence about a previous consistent statement.
(c) circumstantial evidence.
(d) character evidence.
Answer 6
(1) Only statements (a), (c) and (d) are correct.
(2) Only statements (b) and (c) are
correct. (3) Only statement (b) is
correct.
(4) Only statement (a) is correct.
(5) Only statement (d) is correct.
Question 7
(a) In the case of an alleged offence of a sexual nature, evidence of a previous
consistent statement will inter alia be admissible if the complaint was made at
the first reasonable opportunity, but not later than 48 hours after the alleged
offence was committed.
(b) A previous consistent statement is usually made by an accused while in police
custody.
(c) There is question of a previous consistent statement when, during testimony in
court, a witness repeats a statement consistent with one made on a previous
occasion, in order to corroborate his or her evidence.
(d) There is question of a previous consistent statement when a witness repeats a
consistent statement made by another witness on a previous occasion, which
serves as self- corroboration for the other witness.
Answer 7
(1) Only statement (a) is correct.
(2) Only statements (a) and (b) are correct.
This study source was downloaded by 100000851744438 from CourseHero.com on 09-08-2022 07:28:56 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/64861042/codocx/