100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

COM 4806-Organisational Communication Research ASSIGNMENT 1 LATEST 2022.

Rating
-
Sold
2
Pages
14
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
02-09-2022
Written in
2022/2023

COM 4806-Organisational Communication Research ASSIGNMENT 1 LATEST 2022. 1 INTRODUCTION Research is one of many different ways of knowing or understanding something. Research is conducted for a variety of reasons, including understanding, describing, predicting, or controlling an educational or psychological phenomenon, or to empower individuals in such contexts. As a result, this study is based on the philosophical foundations of communication research. The first section is divided into five parts, each with a different paradigmatic viewpoint. These are the pragmatic, postcolonial, indigenous, decolonial positivist, interpretivist, and transformative, in that order. The research examines the relationships between paradigmatic positions and epistemology, axiology, ontology, and methodology paradigms. In the second section, the study clarifies epistemology and discusses how each paradigmatic stance compares epistemology. It also 3 discusses the research process and epistemology. 2 QUESTION 1: DIFFERENT PARADIGMATIC POSITIONS Ndlovu-Gatsheni (2017:187) states that, the main issue is that research is still based on a Euro-North American worldview. Researching continues to empower the "researcher" with the ability to define. Instead of people, the "researched" appear as "specimens." For that reason, a research methodology is defined as the process of attempting to understand the "Other," who becomes the object rather than the subject of study, and what it means to be known by others. As a result, methodology must be decolonized. Its decolonization is an ethical, ontological, and political exercise rather than a matter of approach and methods of producing knowledge. According to Chilisa and Kawulich (2012:51), "this paradigmatic position carries hope and promotes transformation and social change among the historically oppressed by employing challenging deficit ways of thinking and 4 pathological descriptions of the former colonized to reconstruct a body of knowledge to focus on positive deviations in the context of postcolonial future success." Indigenous knowledge systems, critical theory, postcolonial discourses, feminist theories, critical race-specific theories, and neo-Marxist theories all inform this paradigmatic position. The positivist equates the empirical world of data (language) with the real world of mechanism. The assumption that such an independent reality exists leads to the belief that a universal truth also exists, a belief that critical realists have challenged. The search for empirical regularity that characterizes positivist philosophy is related to this. Because positivist philosophy adheres to realism or gullible realism, the empirical regularity observed are statistical treasures rather than a representation of the real world of mechanism. Oppong (2014:245) Guba and Lincoln (2005:114) proposed a set of criteria for assessing the credibility of interpretive research. Quality research is defined as having credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. If researchers are honest and conscientious in their pursuit of truth, the results have resonance for people in other contexts, and the steps and methods of the study are described in detail, then the study meets the quality criteria proposed by Guba and Lincoln. Critical methodology is dialogic and dialectical Guba and Lincoln,( 2005), requiring the investigator to engage the subjects in dialogue with the goal of bringing about change in their outlook on social systems that keep them deprived of intellectual and social needs. To avoid exclusion of participants, researchers take a collaborative approach, involving subjects in the formulation of questions, data collection, and analysis. Critical educational researchers could help to transform social systems based on injustice and discrimination.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
September 2, 2022
Number of pages
14
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

Organisational Communication Research
COM4806
ASSIGNMENT 1




STUDENT NAME: TIISETSO FAITH MOAGI


STUDENT NUMBER: 59750650


UNIQUENUMBER: 177794


MODULE CODE: COM4806


YEAR: 2022




1

, DECLARATION OF OWN WORK


I, TIISETSO FAITH MOAGI
Confirm that:
✓ This MODULE contains my own, original ideas and work
✓ those ideas, or work, that are not my own, have been cited using the prescribed referencing
system, with which I have familiarised myself, as described in Tutorial Letter CMNHON/E/301
✓ I have not submitted the ideas or work contained in this MODULE for any other tertiary
education credit
✓ I have read Unisa’s Policy of Research Ethics Policy on Research Ethics.pdf
✓I have familiarised myself with WRITING FOR ACADEMIC INTEGRITY at
https://sites.google.com/a/unisacommscience.co.za/writing-for-academicintegrity/home?pli=1
✓ I have read and understood the PLAGIARISM POWERPOINT FOR POSTGRADUATE
STUDIES (available under ADDITIONAL SOURCES on myUnisa)
✓ I have familiarised myself with the library guides offered by Unisa’s Library at
https://libguides.unisa.ac.za/research-support/plagiarism
✓ I have read and understood Unisa’s Policy for Copyright Infringement and Plagiarism AND I
am aware that plagiarism is punishable in terms of the Copyright Act 98 of 1978. I have also read
the regulations of the University of South Africa in this respect, which are available online at
https://www.unisa.ac.za/static/corporate_web/Content/Apply%20for%20admission/Do
cuments/Policy_copyright_infringement_plagiarism_16November2005.pdf

__59750650__
STUDENT NUMBER

__TIISETSO MOAGI__ _23 MAY 2022___
SIGNATURE DATE

_EMMANUEL MOAGI__ _23 MAY 2022___
WITNESS DATE

Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 4
2 QUESTION 1: DIFFERENT PARADIGMATIC POSITIONS..........................................................................5
3 QUESTION2:PARADIGMATIC ASSUMPTIONS....................................................................................7
2.1 The Afrocentric decolonial/indigenous/postcolonial paradigmatic position.......................................7
2.2 The difference between epistemology of positivism and epistemology of interpretivism............8
2.3 Critique the epistemological orientations of both positivism and interpretivism from a
decolonial/indigenous/postcolonial position........................................................................................... 8
2.4 Realism and relativism as ontological positions and compare positivism, interpretivism and
critical realism ontologically..................................................................................................................... 9
2.5 The 'relationality' as an ethical framework (axiology) that informs the epistemology and
ontology of decolonial/indigenous/postcolonial paradigmatic positions...............................................10
2.6 The relationship between epistemology and methodology in research.....................................11
4 QUESTION 3: IT'S PERSONAL.............................................................................................................. 12
5 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................................... 13
SOURCES CONSULTED................................................................................................................................ 14



2

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
DoctorReinhad Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
2138
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
1728
Documents
6004
Last sold
4 days ago
TOP SELLER CENTER

Welcome All to this page. Here you will find ; ALL DOCUMENTS, PACKAGE DEALS, FLASHCARDS AND 100% REVISED & CORRECT STUDY MATERIALS GUARANTEED A+. NB: ALWAYS WRITE A GOOD REVIEW WHEN YOU FIND MY DOCUMENTS OF SUCCOUR TO YOU. ALSO, REFER YOUR COLLEGUES TO MY ACCOUNT. ( Refer 3 and get 1 free document). AM AVAILABLE TO SERVE YOU ANY TIME. WISHING YOU SUCCESS IN YOUR STUDIES. THANK YOU.

3.6

302 reviews

5
130
4
48
3
56
2
17
1
51

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions